You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/19 12:44:12 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-4379) Batch mode for SyncMBeanImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15291032#comment-15291032 ]
angela commented on OAK-4379:
-----------------------------
[~tripod], [~baedke], what do you think?
> Batch mode for SyncMBeanImpl
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4379
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: auth-external
> Reporter: angela
>
> the {{SyncMBeanImpl}} currently calls {{Session.save()}} for every single sync, which IMO make the synchronization methods extra expensive.
> IMHO we should consider introducing a batch mode that reduces the number of save calls. the drawback of this was that the complete set of sync-calls withing a given batch would succeed or fail. in case of failure the 'original' sync-result would need to be replaced by one with operation status 'ERR'.
> now that we have the basis for running benchmarks for the {{SyncMBeanImpl}}, we should be able to verify if this proposal actually has a positive impact (though benchmark results from OAK-4119 and OAK-4120 seem to indicate that this is the case).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)