You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by "Doug Sale (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/08/08 20:59:44 UTC

[jira] Created: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method

compile errors due to removed method
------------------------------------

                 Key: LUCENENET-141
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141
             Project: Lucene.Net
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Doug Sale
         Attachments: LuceneTestCase.patch

looks like a simple omission

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


RE: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method

Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Hi Doug,

"Index was outside of the bounds of the array" exception is thrown from DocumentsWriter.ByteBlockPool.AllocSlice. But I suspect from a bug elsewhere.

DIGY

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Sale (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org] 
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 10:00 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Doug Sale updated LUCENENET-141:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: LuceneTestCase.patch

simple addition of missing method

> compile errors due to removed method
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Doug Sale
>         Attachments: LuceneTestCase.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> looks like a simple omission

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


RE: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method

Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Thanks for the patch Doug!  This was my bad.  I don't know how, but some
how, I removed the TearDown() method as I was fixing up another error.  I
re-introduced the original code and the HEAD is now compileable again.

-- George

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Sale (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org] 
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 3:00 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due 
> to removed method
> 
> 
>      [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141?page=com.a
tlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
> 
> Doug Sale updated LUCENENET-141:
> --------------------------------
> 
>     Attachment: LuceneTestCase.patch
> 
> simple addition of missing method
> 
> > compile errors due to removed method
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: LUCENENET-141
> >                 URL: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141
> >             Project: Lucene.Net
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >            Reporter: Doug Sale
> >         Attachments: LuceneTestCase.patch
> >
> >   Original Estimate: 0h
> >  Remaining Estimate: 0h
> >
> > looks like a simple omission
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> 


[jira] Updated: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method

Posted by "Doug Sale (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Doug Sale updated LUCENENET-141:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: LuceneTestCase.patch

simple addition of missing method

> compile errors due to removed method
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Doug Sale
>         Attachments: LuceneTestCase.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> looks like a simple omission

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Resolved: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method

Posted by "George Aroush (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

George Aroush resolved LUCENENET-141.
-------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Patch applied.

> compile errors due to removed method
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Doug Sale
>         Attachments: LuceneTestCase.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> looks like a simple omission

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Closed: (LUCENENET-141) compile errors due to removed method

Posted by "George Aroush (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

George Aroush closed LUCENENET-141.
-----------------------------------


> compile errors due to removed method
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-141
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-141
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Doug Sale
>         Attachments: LuceneTestCase.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> looks like a simple omission

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.