You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@struts.apache.org by "Antonio Petrelli (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/10/17 09:54:25 UTC

[jira] Commented: (SB-44) TilesContextFactory should be a regular class

    [ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-44?page=comments#action_38418 ] 
            
Antonio Petrelli commented on SB-44:
------------------------------------

David
Can you export your patch again? It seems that it contains also code committed in SB-28.
Thank you

> TilesContextFactory should be a regular class
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SB-44
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-44
>             Project: Sandbox
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tiles
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>         Environment: None
>            Reporter: Antonio Petrelli
>         Attachments: tiles-context-factory.patch
>
>
> The org.apache.tiles.context.TilesContextFactory class should be a regular class, not a class with only static methods.
> This is because this object could eventually be replaced with another one specified by the developer that uses Tiles, i.e. enhancing configuration. Moreover, a class with only static methods should be only an "utility class", thing that TilesContextFactory is not.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

[tiles2] Re: [jira] Commented: (SB-44) TilesContextFactory should be a regular class

Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Hmm. . .  I'll look into it. . .sorry about that.

Antonio Petrelli (JIRA) wrote:
>     [ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-44?page=comments#action_38418 ] 
>             
> Antonio Petrelli commented on SB-44:
> ------------------------------------
> 
> David
> Can you export your patch again? It seems that it contains also code committed in SB-28.
> Thank you
> 
>> TilesContextFactory should be a regular class
>> ---------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: SB-44
>>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SB-44
>>             Project: Sandbox
>>          Issue Type: Improvement
>>          Components: Tiles
>>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>>         Environment: None
>>            Reporter: Antonio Petrelli
>>         Attachments: tiles-context-factory.patch
>>
>>
>> The org.apache.tiles.context.TilesContextFactory class should be a regular class, not a class with only static methods.
>> This is because this object could eventually be replaced with another one specified by the developer that uses Tiles, i.e. enhancing configuration. Moreover, a class with only static methods should be only an "utility class", thing that TilesContextFactory is not.
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org