You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> on 2012/01/30 22:07:43 UTC
Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
this months reports for your project - see below
If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
then time to edit it.
If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
Ross
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
Subject: Questions for projects
To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
(excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
the February reports on key issues.
> Airavata
Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
diverse is your community now?
What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
> Ambari
How has CTR worked for you?
I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
> Amber
Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
University of Newcastle"?
> Clerezza
Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
Any other issues before graduation?
> DeltaSpike
How is the Git repository working for you?
> Droids
Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
> HISE
Result of the retirement vote.
> Jena
When can I vote on your graduation?
> Lucene.NET
When can I vote on your graduation?
> NPanday
When can I vote on your graduation?
> Nuvem
I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
> OpenNLP
Congratulations on graduation!
> PhotArk
I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
> SIS
Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
> Stanbol
Still no release?
Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
report are not blockers for graduation.
> VCL
What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> Wink
Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
concrete actions you're taking on this?
> Wookie
What's blocking you from graduating?
How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> Zeta Components
How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
Signed off - thanks
On 1 February 2012 09:18, Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I extended the description of what has been holding up the release.
>
> Since I got no new suggestions I would say it is ready now.
>
> Daniel
>
>>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <me...@farewellutopia.com>.
+1
On Feb 1, 2012 10:18 AM, "Daniel Spicar" <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I extended the description of what has been holding up the release.
>
> Since I got no new suggestions I would say it is ready now.
>
> Daniel
>
> >
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I extended the description of what has been holding up the release.
Since I got no new suggestions I would say it is ready now.
Daniel
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org>.
Thanks for clarification, Ross.
I enhanced the entry with a reference to Domeo and the the suggestions
regarding the community development entry.
Does anyone else have a suggestion or information we could add?
Daniel
On 31 January 2012 17:37, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 16:22, Daniel Spicar <da...@trialox.org> wrote:
> > I agree that the point should be written differently. However I don't
> want
> > to write something the others don't agree with. Can we reach a consensus
> > that we will come up with a plan on how to grow the community for the
> next
> > report or should I remove the entry until we're ready to make a
> commitment
> > in that direction?
>
> It is a condition of being in the Incubator that projects seek to
> build a community, that's what the incubator is for. So consensus was
> already reached when you entered (and you had it in your draft report
> in the form of "3. Grow community." There is a drive in the Incubator
> to ensure projects have a plan as to how they are going to grow their
> community. This plan need not be grand, just 3-5 key concrete
> activities that will contribute to community health/
>
> Given the short time available for creating such a plan for this
> report I'm happy to sign off with an acknowledgement of the need to
> discuss this for the next report. However, removing the intent to
> "grow community" will likely be more detrimental to your report than
> not including my suggestion.
>
> Ross
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
On 31 January 2012 16:22, Daniel Spicar <da...@trialox.org> wrote:
> I agree that the point should be written differently. However I don't want
> to write something the others don't agree with. Can we reach a consensus
> that we will come up with a plan on how to grow the community for the next
> report or should I remove the entry until we're ready to make a commitment
> in that direction?
It is a condition of being in the Incubator that projects seek to
build a community, that's what the incubator is for. So consensus was
already reached when you entered (and you had it in your draft report
in the form of "3. Grow community." There is a drive in the Incubator
to ensure projects have a plan as to how they are going to grow their
community. This plan need not be grand, just 3-5 key concrete
activities that will contribute to community health/
Given the short time available for creating such a plan for this
report I'm happy to sign off with an acknowledgement of the need to
discuss this for the next report. However, removing the intent to
"grow community" will likely be more detrimental to your report than
not including my suggestion.
Ross
>
> On 31 January 2012 16:48, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ross,
>>
>> I think the right answer to point 3 is that we don't have a concrete plan
>> yet, at least this is my understanding.
>> I personally feel that it should not be that hard to find good ways of let
>> our community grow, Apache Clerezza is being used in Apache Stanbol and
>> other projects I know are considering or already using it (I remember
>> someone on Apache Any23 dev list asked about using Clerezza RDF API) but I
>> agree that needs a clear direction and plan from the PPMC.
>>
>> That said I think your suggestion for point 3 is correct.
>> Tommaso
>>
>> 2012/1/31 Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>
>>
>> > There have been lots of discussion about what a good report is on the
>> > general@incubator list recently. Based on this discussion I would like
>> > to request that "3. Grow community." be expanded. What is the project
>> > actively doing in order to grow community?
>> >
>> > We'd like to see concrete plans here.
>> >
>> > If you don't feel able to add plans at this point then something like
>> > the following will suffice as a place holder.
>> >
>> > "We are aware of the need to define a plan for community development
>> > and will be discussing this in detail with our mentors over the next
>> > quarter. Our next board report will have some clear actions relating
>> > to this objective."
>> >
>> > Ross
>> >
>> > On 31 January 2012 13:31, Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I created a first draft of the Board report at:
>> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>> > >
>> > > Any comments or improvements?
>> > >
>> > > Daniel
>> > >
>> > > On 30 January 2012 22:07, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>> > >> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>> > >> this months reports for your project - see below
>> > >>
>> > >> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>> > >> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>> > >> then time to edit it.
>> > >>
>> > >> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>> > >> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>> > >>
>> > >> Ross
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > >> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>> > >> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>> > >> Subject: Questions for projects
>> > >> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>> > >> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>> > >>
>> > >> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>> > >> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>> > >> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>> > >> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>> > >> the February reports on key issues.
>> > >>
>> > >> > Airavata
>> > >>
>> > >> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>> > >> diverse is your community now?
>> > >>
>> > >> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Ambari
>> > >>
>> > >> How has CTR worked for you?
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's
>> > up?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Amber
>> > >>
>> > >> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>> > >>
>> > >> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>> > >> University of Newcastle"?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Clerezza
>> > >>
>> > >> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>> > >>
>> > >> Any other issues before graduation?
>> > >>
>> > >> > DeltaSpike
>> > >>
>> > >> How is the Git repository working for you?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Droids
>> > >>
>> > >> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's
>> > up?
>> > >>
>> > >> > HISE
>> > >>
>> > >> Result of the retirement vote.
>> > >>
>> > >> > Jena
>> > >>
>> > >> When can I vote on your graduation?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Lucene.NET
>> > >>
>> > >> When can I vote on your graduation?
>> > >>
>> > >> > NPanday
>> > >>
>> > >> When can I vote on your graduation?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Nuvem
>> > >>
>> > >> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>> > >>
>> > >> > OpenNLP
>> > >>
>> > >> Congratulations on graduation!
>> > >>
>> > >> > PhotArk
>> > >>
>> > >> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>> > >>
>> > >> > SIS
>> > >>
>> > >> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Stanbol
>> > >>
>> > >> Still no release?
>> > >>
>> > >> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>> > >> report are not blockers for graduation.
>> > >>
>> > >> > VCL
>> > >>
>> > >> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>> > >>
>> > >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Wink
>> > >>
>> > >> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>> > >> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Wookie
>> > >>
>> > >> What's blocking you from graduating?
>> > >>
>> > >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>> > >>
>> > >> > Zeta Components
>> > >>
>> > >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>> > >>
>> > >> BR,
>> > >>
>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>> > >>
>> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> > >> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> > >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> > Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>> >
>>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Daniel Spicar <da...@trialox.org>.
I agree that the point should be written differently. However I don't want
to write something the others don't agree with. Can we reach a consensus
that we will come up with a plan on how to grow the community for the next
report or should I remove the entry until we're ready to make a commitment
in that direction?
On 31 January 2012 16:48, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> I think the right answer to point 3 is that we don't have a concrete plan
> yet, at least this is my understanding.
> I personally feel that it should not be that hard to find good ways of let
> our community grow, Apache Clerezza is being used in Apache Stanbol and
> other projects I know are considering or already using it (I remember
> someone on Apache Any23 dev list asked about using Clerezza RDF API) but I
> agree that needs a clear direction and plan from the PPMC.
>
> That said I think your suggestion for point 3 is correct.
> Tommaso
>
> 2012/1/31 Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>
>
> > There have been lots of discussion about what a good report is on the
> > general@incubator list recently. Based on this discussion I would like
> > to request that "3. Grow community." be expanded. What is the project
> > actively doing in order to grow community?
> >
> > We'd like to see concrete plans here.
> >
> > If you don't feel able to add plans at this point then something like
> > the following will suffice as a place holder.
> >
> > "We are aware of the need to define a plan for community development
> > and will be discussing this in detail with our mentors over the next
> > quarter. Our next board report will have some clear actions relating
> > to this objective."
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > On 31 January 2012 13:31, Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I created a first draft of the Board report at:
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
> > >
> > > Any comments or improvements?
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > On 30 January 2012 22:07, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
> > >> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
> > >> this months reports for your project - see below
> > >>
> > >> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
> > >> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
> > >> then time to edit it.
> > >>
> > >> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
> > >> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
> > >>
> > >> Ross
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> > >> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
> > >> Subject: Questions for projects
> > >> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> > >> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
> > >>
> > >> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
> > >> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
> > >> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
> > >> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
> > >> the February reports on key issues.
> > >>
> > >> > Airavata
> > >>
> > >> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
> > >> diverse is your community now?
> > >>
> > >> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
> > >>
> > >> > Ambari
> > >>
> > >> How has CTR worked for you?
> > >>
> > >> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's
> > up?
> > >>
> > >> > Amber
> > >>
> > >> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
> > >>
> > >> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> > >> University of Newcastle"?
> > >>
> > >> > Clerezza
> > >>
> > >> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
> > >>
> > >> Any other issues before graduation?
> > >>
> > >> > DeltaSpike
> > >>
> > >> How is the Git repository working for you?
> > >>
> > >> > Droids
> > >>
> > >> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
> > >>
> > >> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's
> > up?
> > >>
> > >> > HISE
> > >>
> > >> Result of the retirement vote.
> > >>
> > >> > Jena
> > >>
> > >> When can I vote on your graduation?
> > >>
> > >> > Lucene.NET
> > >>
> > >> When can I vote on your graduation?
> > >>
> > >> > NPanday
> > >>
> > >> When can I vote on your graduation?
> > >>
> > >> > Nuvem
> > >>
> > >> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
> > >>
> > >> > OpenNLP
> > >>
> > >> Congratulations on graduation!
> > >>
> > >> > PhotArk
> > >>
> > >> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
> > >>
> > >> > SIS
> > >>
> > >> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
> > >>
> > >> > Stanbol
> > >>
> > >> Still no release?
> > >>
> > >> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
> > >> report are not blockers for graduation.
> > >>
> > >> > VCL
> > >>
> > >> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
> > >>
> > >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> > >>
> > >> > Wink
> > >>
> > >> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
> > >> concrete actions you're taking on this?
> > >>
> > >> > Wookie
> > >>
> > >> What's blocking you from graduating?
> > >>
> > >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> > >>
> > >> > Zeta Components
> > >>
> > >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> > >>
> > >> BR,
> > >>
> > >> Jukka Zitting
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> > >> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> > >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> > Programme Leader (Open Development)
> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> >
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ross,
I think the right answer to point 3 is that we don't have a concrete plan
yet, at least this is my understanding.
I personally feel that it should not be that hard to find good ways of let
our community grow, Apache Clerezza is being used in Apache Stanbol and
other projects I know are considering or already using it (I remember
someone on Apache Any23 dev list asked about using Clerezza RDF API) but I
agree that needs a clear direction and plan from the PPMC.
That said I think your suggestion for point 3 is correct.
Tommaso
2012/1/31 Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>
> There have been lots of discussion about what a good report is on the
> general@incubator list recently. Based on this discussion I would like
> to request that "3. Grow community." be expanded. What is the project
> actively doing in order to grow community?
>
> We'd like to see concrete plans here.
>
> If you don't feel able to add plans at this point then something like
> the following will suffice as a place holder.
>
> "We are aware of the need to define a plan for community development
> and will be discussing this in detail with our mentors over the next
> quarter. Our next board report will have some clear actions relating
> to this objective."
>
> Ross
>
> On 31 January 2012 13:31, Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I created a first draft of the Board report at:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
> >
> > Any comments or improvements?
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > On 30 January 2012 22:07, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
> >> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
> >> this months reports for your project - see below
> >>
> >> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
> >> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
> >> then time to edit it.
> >>
> >> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
> >> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
> >>
> >> Ross
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> >> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
> >> Subject: Questions for projects
> >> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> >> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
> >>
> >> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
> >> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
> >> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
> >> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
> >> the February reports on key issues.
> >>
> >> > Airavata
> >>
> >> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
> >> diverse is your community now?
> >>
> >> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
> >>
> >> > Ambari
> >>
> >> How has CTR worked for you?
> >>
> >> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's
> up?
> >>
> >> > Amber
> >>
> >> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
> >>
> >> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> >> University of Newcastle"?
> >>
> >> > Clerezza
> >>
> >> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
> >>
> >> Any other issues before graduation?
> >>
> >> > DeltaSpike
> >>
> >> How is the Git repository working for you?
> >>
> >> > Droids
> >>
> >> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
> >>
> >> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's
> up?
> >>
> >> > HISE
> >>
> >> Result of the retirement vote.
> >>
> >> > Jena
> >>
> >> When can I vote on your graduation?
> >>
> >> > Lucene.NET
> >>
> >> When can I vote on your graduation?
> >>
> >> > NPanday
> >>
> >> When can I vote on your graduation?
> >>
> >> > Nuvem
> >>
> >> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
> >>
> >> > OpenNLP
> >>
> >> Congratulations on graduation!
> >>
> >> > PhotArk
> >>
> >> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
> >>
> >> > SIS
> >>
> >> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
> >>
> >> > Stanbol
> >>
> >> Still no release?
> >>
> >> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
> >> report are not blockers for graduation.
> >>
> >> > VCL
> >>
> >> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
> >>
> >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> >>
> >> > Wink
> >>
> >> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
> >> concrete actions you're taking on this?
> >>
> >> > Wookie
> >>
> >> What's blocking you from graduating?
> >>
> >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> >>
> >> > Zeta Components
> >>
> >> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> >>
> >> BR,
> >>
> >> Jukka Zitting
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> >> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> >> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
There have been lots of discussion about what a good report is on the
general@incubator list recently. Based on this discussion I would like
to request that "3. Grow community." be expanded. What is the project
actively doing in order to grow community?
We'd like to see concrete plans here.
If you don't feel able to add plans at this point then something like
the following will suffice as a place holder.
"We are aware of the need to define a plan for community development
and will be discussing this in detail with our mentors over the next
quarter. Our next board report will have some clear actions relating
to this objective."
Ross
On 31 January 2012 13:31, Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a first draft of the Board report at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Any comments or improvements?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 30 January 2012 22:07, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
>
>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>
>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>> then time to edit it.
>>
>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>> Subject: Questions for projects
>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>
>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>> the February reports on key issues.
>>
>> > Airavata
>>
>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>> diverse is your community now?
>>
>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>
>> > Ambari
>>
>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>
>> > Amber
>>
>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>
>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>> University of Newcastle"?
>>
>> > Clerezza
>>
>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>
>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>
>> > DeltaSpike
>>
>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>
>> > Droids
>>
>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>
>> > HISE
>>
>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>
>> > Jena
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>> > Lucene.NET
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>> > NPanday
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>> > Nuvem
>>
>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>
>> > OpenNLP
>>
>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>
>> > PhotArk
>>
>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>
>> > SIS
>>
>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>
>> > Stanbol
>>
>> Still no release?
>>
>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>
>> > VCL
>>
>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>> > Wink
>>
>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>
>> > Wookie
>>
>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>> > Zeta Components
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
nice one, perhaps it may be of interest that Clerezza is currently being
used by the Domeo framework [1][2].
Tommaso
[1] : http://annotationframework.org/
[2] : http://www.slideshare.net/teofili/domeo-text-mining-uima-and-clerezza/
2012/1/31 Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org>
> Hi,
>
> I created a first draft of the Board report at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Any comments or improvements?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 30 January 2012 22:07, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
>
> > Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
> > the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
> > this months reports for your project - see below
> >
> > If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
> > your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
> > then time to edit it.
> >
> > If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
> > be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
> >
> > Ross
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
> > Subject: Questions for projects
> > To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> > in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
> >
> > I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
> > information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
> > (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
> > or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
> > the February reports on key issues.
> >
> > > Airavata
> >
> > Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
> > diverse is your community now?
> >
> > What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
> >
> > > Ambari
> >
> > How has CTR worked for you?
> >
> > I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
> >
> > > Amber
> >
> > Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
> >
> > What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> > University of Newcastle"?
> >
> > > Clerezza
> >
> > Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
> >
> > Any other issues before graduation?
> >
> > > DeltaSpike
> >
> > How is the Git repository working for you?
> >
> > > Droids
> >
> > Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
> >
> > I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
> >
> > > HISE
> >
> > Result of the retirement vote.
> >
> > > Jena
> >
> > When can I vote on your graduation?
> >
> > > Lucene.NET
> >
> > When can I vote on your graduation?
> >
> > > NPanday
> >
> > When can I vote on your graduation?
> >
> > > Nuvem
> >
> > I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
> >
> > > OpenNLP
> >
> > Congratulations on graduation!
> >
> > > PhotArk
> >
> > I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
> >
> > > SIS
> >
> > Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
> >
> > > Stanbol
> >
> > Still no release?
> >
> > Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
> > report are not blockers for graduation.
> >
> > > VCL
> >
> > What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
> >
> > How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> >
> > > Wink
> >
> > Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
> > concrete actions you're taking on this?
> >
> > > Wookie
> >
> > What's blocking you from graduating?
> >
> > How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> >
> > > Zeta Components
> >
> > How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jukka Zitting
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> > Programme Leader (Open Development)
> > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
> >
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Daniel Spicar <ds...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I created a first draft of the Board report at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
Any comments or improvements?
Daniel
On 30 January 2012 22:07, Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com> wrote:
> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
> this months reports for your project - see below
>
> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
> then time to edit it.
>
> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>
> Ross
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
> Subject: Questions for projects
> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>
> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
> the February reports on key issues.
>
> > Airavata
>
> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
> diverse is your community now?
>
> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>
> > Ambari
>
> How has CTR worked for you?
>
> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>
> > Amber
>
> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>
> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> University of Newcastle"?
>
> > Clerezza
>
> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>
> Any other issues before graduation?
>
> > DeltaSpike
>
> How is the Git repository working for you?
>
> > Droids
>
> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>
> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>
> > HISE
>
> Result of the retirement vote.
>
> > Jena
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
> > Lucene.NET
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
> > NPanday
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
> > Nuvem
>
> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>
> > OpenNLP
>
> Congratulations on graduation!
>
> > PhotArk
>
> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>
> > SIS
>
> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>
> > Stanbol
>
> Still no release?
>
> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
> report are not blockers for graduation.
>
> > VCL
>
> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
> > Wink
>
> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>
> > Wookie
>
> What's blocking you from graduating?
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
> > Zeta Components
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
Re: Board report due Fwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
signed off - thanks
On 31 January 2012 14:07, Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2012, at 08:29, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2012 11:23 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> One suggested change below... otherwise it's a good report and I'm
>>> happy to sign it off.
>>
>> I also like the report, with something as the suggested change from Ross below as improvement as well.
>>
>> If you can give a heads-up when it is added to the wiki, I'll sign it off as well.
>>
>> Ate
>
> Thanks Ate,
>
> I've made the change that Ross suggested, and posted the report on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> S
>
>>
>>>
>>> On 30 January 2012 22:03, Scott Wilson<sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Wookie has a small but quite active community, and the main issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have more diversity in our community. As it stands we could probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3 organisation), but we feel we need at least one more active committer before we feel we're ready to graduate.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would phrase this differently...
>>>
>>> Wookie has a small, reasonably active community, however, the majority
>>> of that activity is focussed around one or two individuals. The main
>>> issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have
>>> more diversity in our community. However, as it stands we could
>>> probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3
>>> organisation). We recognise that some IPMC members would suggest
>>> graduation at this point might help accelerate community growth. We
>>> intend to discuss this within the community over the next quarter
>>> whilst also seeking to expand our community.
>>>
>>> Ross
>>
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report due Fwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/31/2012 03:07 PM, Scott Wilson wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2012, at 08:29, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2012 11:23 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>> One suggested change below... otherwise it's a good report and I'm
>>> happy to sign it off.
>>
>> I also like the report, with something as the suggested change from Ross below as improvement as well.
>>
>> If you can give a heads-up when it is added to the wiki, I'll sign it off as well.
>>
>> Ate
>
> Thanks Ate,
>
> I've made the change that Ross suggested, and posted the report on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
Thanks Scott. I've signed off as well.
>
> S
>
>>
>>>
>>> On 30 January 2012 22:03, Scott Wilson<sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Wookie has a small but quite active community, and the main issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have more diversity in our community. As it stands we could probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3 organisation), but we feel we need at least one more active committer before we feel we're ready to graduate.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would phrase this differently...
>>>
>>> Wookie has a small, reasonably active community, however, the majority
>>> of that activity is focussed around one or two individuals. The main
>>> issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have
>>> more diversity in our community. However, as it stands we could
>>> probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3
>>> organisation). We recognise that some IPMC members would suggest
>>> graduation at this point might help accelerate community growth. We
>>> intend to discuss this within the community over the next quarter
>>> whilst also seeking to expand our community.
>>>
>>> Ross
>>
>
Re: Board report due Fwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com>.
On 31 Jan 2012, at 08:29, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 11:23 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>> One suggested change below... otherwise it's a good report and I'm
>> happy to sign it off.
>
> I also like the report, with something as the suggested change from Ross below as improvement as well.
>
> If you can give a heads-up when it is added to the wiki, I'll sign it off as well.
>
> Ate
Thanks Ate,
I've made the change that Ross suggested, and posted the report on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
S
>
>>
>> On 30 January 2012 22:03, Scott Wilson<sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Wookie has a small but quite active community, and the main issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have more diversity in our community. As it stands we could probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3 organisation), but we feel we need at least one more active committer before we feel we're ready to graduate.
>>>
>>
>> I would phrase this differently...
>>
>> Wookie has a small, reasonably active community, however, the majority
>> of that activity is focussed around one or two individuals. The main
>> issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have
>> more diversity in our community. However, as it stands we could
>> probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3
>> organisation). We recognise that some IPMC members would suggest
>> graduation at this point might help accelerate community growth. We
>> intend to discuss this within the community over the next quarter
>> whilst also seeking to expand our community.
>>
>> Ross
>
Re: Board report due Fwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/30/2012 11:23 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> One suggested change below... otherwise it's a good report and I'm
> happy to sign it off.
I also like the report, with something as the suggested change from Ross below
as improvement as well.
If you can give a heads-up when it is added to the wiki, I'll sign it off as well.
Ate
>
> On 30 January 2012 22:03, Scott Wilson<sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Wookie has a small but quite active community, and the main issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have more diversity in our community. As it stands we could probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3 organisation), but we feel we need at least one more active committer before we feel we're ready to graduate.
>>
>
> I would phrase this differently...
>
> Wookie has a small, reasonably active community, however, the majority
> of that activity is focussed around one or two individuals. The main
> issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have
> more diversity in our community. However, as it stands we could
> probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3
> organisation). We recognise that some IPMC members would suggest
> graduation at this point might help accelerate community growth. We
> intend to discuss this within the community over the next quarter
> whilst also seeking to expand our community.
>
> Ross
Re: Board report due Fwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
One suggested change below... otherwise it's a good report and I'm
happy to sign it off.
On 30 January 2012 22:03, Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wookie has a small but quite active community, and the main issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have more diversity in our community. As it stands we could probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3 organisation), but we feel we need at least one more active committer before we feel we're ready to graduate.
>
I would phrase this differently...
Wookie has a small, reasonably active community, however, the majority
of that activity is focussed around one or two individuals. The main
issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have
more diversity in our community. However, as it stands we could
probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3
organisation). We recognise that some IPMC members would suggest
graduation at this point might help accelerate community growth. We
intend to discuss this within the community over the next quarter
whilst also seeking to expand our community.
Ross
Re: Board report due Fwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Scott Wilson <sc...@gmail.com>.
Wow, that came around quickly.
OK, here's a draft - its a lot wordier than usual as there has been some specific questions raised on the incubator general list about how to get projects graduating.
I don't want this report to sound at all "defensive" on this topic but rather to encourage more ASF folks to pitch in and help us out and give us some good ideas and suggestions - so if anyone can suggest a better form of words, please do!
========
Wookie
Wookie is a Java server application that allows you to upload and deploy widgets for your applications. Wookie is based on the W3C Widgets specification, but widgets can also be included that use extended APIs such as Google Wave Gadgets and OpenSocial.
Wookie has been incubating since 17th July 2009
Wookie has a small but quite active community, and the main issue we would like to address before graduation is to ensure we have more diversity in our community. As it stands we could probably graduate as we meet the minimum criteria (5 committers from 3 organisation), but we feel we need at least one more active committer before we feel we're ready to graduate.
One strategy for this is to reach out to projects and teams already using Wookie and encourage their developers to contribute back to the community. We know several projects (both in commercial and academic sectors) that have been conducting R&D activity using Wookie and we want to make sure we can bring in both contributions from these projects and also welcome their developers into our community.
However we feel that Wookie will only really become fully sustainable when there is more uptake of the W3C Widgets/Native Web Applications specifications into "real" systems and products. On this front we're active and visible in W3C, along with PhoneGap/Apache Cordova (incubating) who also support W3C Widgets (the W3C Native Web Apps Community have a co-chair who is a Wookie committer and another who is a Cordova committer). Another strategy has been to support integration in Apache Rave (currently preparing to graduate) as this is a way to build our user base (and is also a great way to demo Wookie). Another approach we're looking at is how we can use Wookie to deploy widgets that relate to ASF processes and activities as a way of raising awareness and interest; we've done some experiments with Widgets using the Jira API as a starting point for a demonstrator.
In any case, we can certainly do more to promote Wookie and generate interest.
Since November 2011:
* 0.9.1 release
* Received updated patch for oAuth support from community member
* Received documentation contribution for packaging Wookie as a portable app on a USB stick
Next steps:
* 0.9.2 release using an improved and simplified release process
* Developer outreach activity (see above)
* Improve communication about Wookie
* ASF Widgets demo
Issues before graduation:
* build community/expand user base
On 30 Jan 2012, at 21:07, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
> this months reports for your project - see below
>
> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
> then time to edit it.
>
> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>
> Ross
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
> Subject: Questions for projects
> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>
> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
> the February reports on key issues.
>
>> Airavata
>
> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
> diverse is your community now?
>
> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>
>> Ambari
>
> How has CTR worked for you?
>
> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>
>> Amber
>
> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>
> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> University of Newcastle"?
>
>> Clerezza
>
> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>
> Any other issues before graduation?
>
>> DeltaSpike
>
> How is the Git repository working for you?
>
>> Droids
>
> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>
> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>
>> HISE
>
> Result of the retirement vote.
>
>> Jena
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
>> Lucene.NET
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
>> NPanday
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
>> Nuvem
>
> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>
>> OpenNLP
>
> Congratulations on graduation!
>
>> PhotArk
>
> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>
>> SIS
>
> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>
>> Stanbol
>
> Still no release?
>
> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
> report are not blockers for graduation.
>
>> VCL
>
> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
>> Wink
>
> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>
>> Wookie
>
> What's blocking you from graduating?
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
>> Zeta Components
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 01/31/2012 06:34 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
> that you think I've missed.
Looks good, thanks Chris!
I've added my sign off as mentor as well.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>
>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>> then time to edit it.
>>
>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jukka Zitting<ju...@gmail.com>
>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>> Subject: Questions for projects
>> To: general<ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>
>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>> the February reports on key issues.
>>
>>> Airavata
>>
>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>> diverse is your community now?
>>
>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>
>>> Ambari
>>
>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>
>>> Amber
>>
>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>
>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>> University of Newcastle"?
>>
>>> Clerezza
>>
>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>
>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>
>>> DeltaSpike
>>
>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>
>>> Droids
>>
>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>
>>> HISE
>>
>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>
>>> Jena
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>>> Lucene.NET
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>>> NPanday
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>>> Nuvem
>>
>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>
>>> OpenNLP
>>
>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>
>>> PhotArk
>>
>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>
>>> SIS
>>
>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>
>>> Stanbol
>>
>> Still no release?
>>
>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>
>>> VCL
>>
>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>>> Wink
>>
>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>
>>> Wookie
>>
>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>>> Zeta Components
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Marlon Pierce <ma...@iu.edu>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, Ross, Chris and Ate--Suresh is out recruiting new contributors at Iowa State. I don't have any additions.
Marlon
On 1/31/12 5:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 05:34, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
>> that you think I've missed.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Thanks Chris...
>
> I'm concerned that a mentor is writing the report. It should be the
> podling members themselves (with mentor guidance) - nevertheless -
> thank you Chris.
>
> "2. Test coverage of the code has to be increased significantly."
>
> Doesn't really seem to be a barrier to graduation, quite the opposite
> in fact. I replaced it with "Create a regular and predictable release
> process and schedule" - if the community doesn't like that then go
> edit it.
>
> Changed "We don't have a ton of diversity in response to Jukka's query
> on #3" to "Whilst our community is reasonably large and active we do
> not, at present, have significant diversity." (my reasoning is that
> board members may not have read Jukka's mail. Similarly I changed
> "Regarding Jukka's query on the 0.2 release candidate" to "The 0.2
> release candidate"
>
> I've signed off.
> Ross
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>>
>>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>>> then time to edit it.
>>>
>>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>>> Subject: Questions for projects
>>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>>
>>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>>> the February reports on key issues.
>>>
>>>> Airavata
>>>
>>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>>> diverse is your community now?
>>>
>>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>>
>>>> Ambari
>>>
>>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>
>>>> Amber
>>>
>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>>
>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>>> University of Newcastle"?
>>>
>>>> Clerezza
>>>
>>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>>
>>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>>
>>>> DeltaSpike
>>>
>>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>>
>>>> Droids
>>>
>>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>
>>>> HISE
>>>
>>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>>
>>>> Jena
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> Lucene.NET
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> NPanday
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> Nuvem
>>>
>>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>>
>>>> OpenNLP
>>>
>>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>>
>>>> PhotArk
>>>
>>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>>
>>>> SIS
>>>
>>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>>
>>>> Stanbol
>>>
>>> Still no release?
>>>
>>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>>
>>>> VCL
>>>
>>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>>> Wink
>>>
>>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>>
>>>> Wookie
>>>
>>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>>> Zeta Components
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPJ+myAAoJEEfVXEODPFIDu/oIAIlHObNZEOLse137jzQ/xT5q
lxhZhSqqYSYWIjRDsw+WHIMJ/LV4JSUpbxGh86zIJDhSUOCBdEAkXKHwhiuvmgm0
tcRkTvk1R8dsME7qNAEnTJULQUl7xgdfSFBeeAxDf/srenOCs5hu7vp7li3YETCa
9AwECawlQ9zgrF37HhMNmmvx9VMBIo4nhzTUXn7Tnk18yULLMMe7qnMNtVptlX5i
bagr9zRXVXE0ove2gawsh2weXSns5/MH3gqL/9m92zQ1oY/vMZ/qnFk2BOQtGqIy
RVGboozUsvzI26QY0xwQqvcEQ6Qk6a0y9YYzTx4FmZCQwO/l1HP/YFtAW6r1F24=
=v9TW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
On Jan 31, 2012, at 6:14 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> No worries Suresh - nobody is expected to act instantly around here,
> we are all volunteers. I might be grumpy sometimes but I (try to)
> never forget that :-)
You were not grumpy (may be as such you are, but certainly not on this topic :-)). We need mentors to remind us the importance of certain tasks while we continue to learn the apache way. Agreed on the volunteer time but reports are important ones to demand attention. Your concern of polling members not matching mentor enthusiasm is very valid and these are constructive remarks to boost our participation and be more pro-active.
Suresh
>
> Ross
>
>
>
> On 31 January 2012 12:10, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> On 31 January 2012 05:34, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
>>>> that you think I've missed.
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>>>
>>> Thanks Chris...
>>>
>>> I'm concerned that a mentor is writing the report. It should be the
>>> podling members themselves (with mentor guidance) - nevertheless -
>>> thank you Chris.
>>
>> Hi Chris, thank you very much for writing the report.
>>
>> Hi Ross,
>>
>> I am sorry for not acting instantly on the report, I was about to write it this morning but since three mentors signed off, I am hesitant to change it and more over Chris's draft and your corrections seems to be very apt.
>>
>> We delayed the releases getting the artifacts right and making sure all the pom's (for simplicity code is divided into many modules) are nicely synced up. If the current voting release goes through, it validates all the process and we immediately have next release lined up (we made the current release voting from a branch while trunk moved on). We will make subsequent release plan and address number 3.
>>
>> We agree with the barrier being high and we will focus on the JIRA and documentation which will address both 1 & 2.
>>
>> Thanks Again Chris, Ate, & Ross for signing of the report,
>> Suresh
>>
>>>
>>> "2. Test coverage of the code has to be increased significantly."
>>>
>>> Doesn't really seem to be a barrier to graduation, quite the opposite
>>> in fact. I replaced it with "Create a regular and predictable release
>>> process and schedule" - if the community doesn't like that then go
>>> edit it.
>>>
>>> Changed "We don't have a ton of diversity in response to Jukka's query
>>> on #3" to "Whilst our community is reasonably large and active we do
>>> not, at present, have significant diversity." (my reasoning is that
>>> board members may not have read Jukka's mail. Similarly I changed
>>> "Regarding Jukka's query on the 0.2 release candidate" to "The 0.2
>>> release candidate"
>>>
>>> I've signed off.
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>>>>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>>>>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>>>>
>>>>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>>>>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>>>>> then time to edit it.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>>>>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>>>>
>>>>> Ross
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>>>>> Subject: Questions for projects
>>>>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>>>>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>>>>
>>>>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>>>>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>>>>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>>>>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>>>>> the February reports on key issues.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Airavata
>>>>>
>>>>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>>>>> diverse is your community now?
>>>>>
>>>>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ambari
>>>>>
>>>>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Amber
>>>>>
>>>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>>>>> University of Newcastle"?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Clerezza
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>>>>
>>>>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>>>>
>>>>>> DeltaSpike
>>>>>
>>>>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Droids
>>>>>
>>>>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>>>
>>>>>> HISE
>>>>>
>>>>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jena
>>>>>
>>>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucene.NET
>>>>>
>>>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>>>
>>>>>> NPanday
>>>>>
>>>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nuvem
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>>>>
>>>>>> OpenNLP
>>>>>
>>>>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>>>>
>>>>>> PhotArk
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>>>>
>>>>>> SIS
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Stanbol
>>>>>
>>>>> Still no release?
>>>>>
>>>>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>>>>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>>>>
>>>>>> VCL
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>>>>
>>>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wink
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>>>>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wookie
>>>>>
>>>>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>>>>
>>>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Zeta Components
>>>>>
>>>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>>>
>>>>> BR,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>>>>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>>>>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPJ9pCAAoJEHmz9P1hfdutYDQQAKSf4cFC7K4RHU2NQZgQ/wK4
>> SAq86RlUc5t0Wilp50R2MbCsJ0Z+gXc6EbdrFT6nq4vDbCFd4oW45BJeIMLpXicW
>> Uhx+Dpq74u460OyhTjzDXQXl4jd6/lFN+0efNOs4Dh5ubKKyDgf3VvkfExlwn+aO
>> 9NL2VH1o5ueZExYd53nyqcUsJXRHV5PpuPsgwnpMWeUgxDd6sUZ15bpH87cW7vSU
>> 1sqVykK9YbEZbGo2kqwEh0OoG+oLVYvlZbuHVySe6nF88gnxB50ffaXNhDo3jGJa
>> kHXcWEiFMQgJGRltdQu9gtn5G7XeP9XQomSSkRGLrSk+Pcvf49jZMqvRMqawxaR7
>> laVsVdULzptg2rEqiwGRDhGhP6tP+bZosKBXzXJe4zc9nAA1CakwAumwilHyj0r3
>> xb93WwshdjtBh7s/4kq/F8k18286Y+UuXhpT3eG8UyiEQ/vXn/iAb2rESVa4oCeB
>> jpSgablKWjOZE99CdCT89qE55t0fx1mHiikkcL91+eLQG5+SqfcG6TKMkIig6rS/
>> t95fARxjnBtKehSxfggPY855Nhzlu1d8etjWk7JsWKPMsmQatJRwM+RkKnljvt5T
>> HNaVQhdMYULn+7LgMNbLV4bTJiQfWsUE8GsQr1gtkZ+H1TNhm0KdbLTE3q/w8D0d
>> dEUBeIMV9eW56KxWgIuG
>> =P0RH
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
No worries Suresh - nobody is expected to act instantly around here,
we are all volunteers. I might be grumpy sometimes but I (try to)
never forget that :-)
Ross
On 31 January 2012 12:10, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> On 31 January 2012 05:34, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
>>> that you think I've missed.
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>>
>> Thanks Chris...
>>
>> I'm concerned that a mentor is writing the report. It should be the
>> podling members themselves (with mentor guidance) - nevertheless -
>> thank you Chris.
>
> Hi Chris, thank you very much for writing the report.
>
> Hi Ross,
>
> I am sorry for not acting instantly on the report, I was about to write it this morning but since three mentors signed off, I am hesitant to change it and more over Chris's draft and your corrections seems to be very apt.
>
> We delayed the releases getting the artifacts right and making sure all the pom's (for simplicity code is divided into many modules) are nicely synced up. If the current voting release goes through, it validates all the process and we immediately have next release lined up (we made the current release voting from a branch while trunk moved on). We will make subsequent release plan and address number 3.
>
> We agree with the barrier being high and we will focus on the JIRA and documentation which will address both 1 & 2.
>
> Thanks Again Chris, Ate, & Ross for signing of the report,
> Suresh
>
>>
>> "2. Test coverage of the code has to be increased significantly."
>>
>> Doesn't really seem to be a barrier to graduation, quite the opposite
>> in fact. I replaced it with "Create a regular and predictable release
>> process and schedule" - if the community doesn't like that then go
>> edit it.
>>
>> Changed "We don't have a ton of diversity in response to Jukka's query
>> on #3" to "Whilst our community is reasonably large and active we do
>> not, at present, have significant diversity." (my reasoning is that
>> board members may not have read Jukka's mail. Similarly I changed
>> "Regarding Jukka's query on the 0.2 release candidate" to "The 0.2
>> release candidate"
>>
>> I've signed off.
>> Ross
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>>
>>>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>>>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>>>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>>>
>>>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>>>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>>>> then time to edit it.
>>>>
>>>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>>>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>>>
>>>> Ross
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>>>> Subject: Questions for projects
>>>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>>>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>>>
>>>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>>>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>>>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>>>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>>>> the February reports on key issues.
>>>>
>>>>> Airavata
>>>>
>>>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>>>> diverse is your community now?
>>>>
>>>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>>>
>>>>> Ambari
>>>>
>>>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>>>
>>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>>
>>>>> Amber
>>>>
>>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>>>
>>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>>>> University of Newcastle"?
>>>>
>>>>> Clerezza
>>>>
>>>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>>>
>>>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>>>
>>>>> DeltaSpike
>>>>
>>>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>>>
>>>>> Droids
>>>>
>>>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>>>
>>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>>
>>>>> HISE
>>>>
>>>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>>>
>>>>> Jena
>>>>
>>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>>
>>>>> Lucene.NET
>>>>
>>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>>
>>>>> NPanday
>>>>
>>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>>
>>>>> Nuvem
>>>>
>>>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>>>
>>>>> OpenNLP
>>>>
>>>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>>>
>>>>> PhotArk
>>>>
>>>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>>>
>>>>> SIS
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>>>
>>>>> Stanbol
>>>>
>>>> Still no release?
>>>>
>>>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>>>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>>>
>>>>> VCL
>>>>
>>>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>>>
>>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>>
>>>>> Wink
>>>>
>>>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>>>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>>>
>>>>> Wookie
>>>>
>>>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>>>
>>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>>
>>>>> Zeta Components
>>>>
>>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>>
>>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>>>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>>>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPJ9pCAAoJEHmz9P1hfdutYDQQAKSf4cFC7K4RHU2NQZgQ/wK4
> SAq86RlUc5t0Wilp50R2MbCsJ0Z+gXc6EbdrFT6nq4vDbCFd4oW45BJeIMLpXicW
> Uhx+Dpq74u460OyhTjzDXQXl4jd6/lFN+0efNOs4Dh5ubKKyDgf3VvkfExlwn+aO
> 9NL2VH1o5ueZExYd53nyqcUsJXRHV5PpuPsgwnpMWeUgxDd6sUZ15bpH87cW7vSU
> 1sqVykK9YbEZbGo2kqwEh0OoG+oLVYvlZbuHVySe6nF88gnxB50ffaXNhDo3jGJa
> kHXcWEiFMQgJGRltdQu9gtn5G7XeP9XQomSSkRGLrSk+Pcvf49jZMqvRMqawxaR7
> laVsVdULzptg2rEqiwGRDhGhP6tP+bZosKBXzXJe4zc9nAA1CakwAumwilHyj0r3
> xb93WwshdjtBh7s/4kq/F8k18286Y+UuXhpT3eG8UyiEQ/vXn/iAb2rESVa4oCeB
> jpSgablKWjOZE99CdCT89qE55t0fx1mHiikkcL91+eLQG5+SqfcG6TKMkIig6rS/
> t95fARxjnBtKehSxfggPY855Nhzlu1d8etjWk7JsWKPMsmQatJRwM+RkKnljvt5T
> HNaVQhdMYULn+7LgMNbLV4bTJiQfWsUE8GsQr1gtkZ+H1TNhm0KdbLTE3q/w8D0d
> dEUBeIMV9eW56KxWgIuG
> =P0RH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>.
On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 05:34, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
>> that you think I've missed.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Thanks Chris...
>
> I'm concerned that a mentor is writing the report. It should be the
> podling members themselves (with mentor guidance) - nevertheless -
> thank you Chris.
Hi Chris, thank you very much for writing the report.
Hi Ross,
I am sorry for not acting instantly on the report, I was about to write it this morning but since three mentors signed off, I am hesitant to change it and more over Chris's draft and your corrections seems to be very apt.
We delayed the releases getting the artifacts right and making sure all the pom's (for simplicity code is divided into many modules) are nicely synced up. If the current voting release goes through, it validates all the process and we immediately have next release lined up (we made the current release voting from a branch while trunk moved on). We will make subsequent release plan and address number 3.
We agree with the barrier being high and we will focus on the JIRA and documentation which will address both 1 & 2.
Thanks Again Chris, Ate, & Ross for signing of the report,
Suresh
>
> "2. Test coverage of the code has to be increased significantly."
>
> Doesn't really seem to be a barrier to graduation, quite the opposite
> in fact. I replaced it with "Create a regular and predictable release
> process and schedule" - if the community doesn't like that then go
> edit it.
>
> Changed "We don't have a ton of diversity in response to Jukka's query
> on #3" to "Whilst our community is reasonably large and active we do
> not, at present, have significant diversity." (my reasoning is that
> board members may not have read Jukka's mail. Similarly I changed
> "Regarding Jukka's query on the 0.2 release candidate" to "The 0.2
> release candidate"
>
> I've signed off.
> Ross
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>>
>>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>>> then time to edit it.
>>>
>>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>>> Subject: Questions for projects
>>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>>
>>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>>> the February reports on key issues.
>>>
>>>> Airavata
>>>
>>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>>> diverse is your community now?
>>>
>>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>>
>>>> Ambari
>>>
>>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>
>>>> Amber
>>>
>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>>
>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>>> University of Newcastle"?
>>>
>>>> Clerezza
>>>
>>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>>
>>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>>
>>>> DeltaSpike
>>>
>>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>>
>>>> Droids
>>>
>>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>
>>>> HISE
>>>
>>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>>
>>>> Jena
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> Lucene.NET
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> NPanday
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> Nuvem
>>>
>>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>>
>>>> OpenNLP
>>>
>>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>>
>>>> PhotArk
>>>
>>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>>
>>>> SIS
>>>
>>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>>
>>>> Stanbol
>>>
>>> Still no release?
>>>
>>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>>
>>>> VCL
>>>
>>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>>> Wink
>>>
>>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>>
>>>> Wookie
>>>
>>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>>> Zeta Components
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Thanks Ross, appreciate it.
And FTR, I'm not concerned that a mentor wrote the report :)
Sometimes it happens and people like me are more interested
in writing reports than code (as of late). I feel it's at least a way
I can contribute if I'm not hacking away at the source so really
no problem on my end.
Cheers everyone!
Chris
On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:01 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 05:34, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
>> that you think I've missed.
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
>
> Thanks Chris...
>
> I'm concerned that a mentor is writing the report. It should be the
> podling members themselves (with mentor guidance) - nevertheless -
> thank you Chris.
>
> "2. Test coverage of the code has to be increased significantly."
>
> Doesn't really seem to be a barrier to graduation, quite the opposite
> in fact. I replaced it with "Create a regular and predictable release
> process and schedule" - if the community doesn't like that then go
> edit it.
>
> Changed "We don't have a ton of diversity in response to Jukka's query
> on #3" to "Whilst our community is reasonably large and active we do
> not, at present, have significant diversity." (my reasoning is that
> board members may not have read Jukka's mail. Similarly I changed
> "Regarding Jukka's query on the 0.2 release candidate" to "The 0.2
> release candidate"
>
> I've signed off.
> Ross
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>>
>>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>>> then time to edit it.
>>>
>>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>>
>>> Ross
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>>> Subject: Questions for projects
>>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>>
>>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>>> the February reports on key issues.
>>>
>>>> Airavata
>>>
>>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>>> diverse is your community now?
>>>
>>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>>
>>>> Ambari
>>>
>>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>
>>>> Amber
>>>
>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>>
>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>>> University of Newcastle"?
>>>
>>>> Clerezza
>>>
>>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>>
>>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>>
>>>> DeltaSpike
>>>
>>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>>
>>>> Droids
>>>
>>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>>
>>>> HISE
>>>
>>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>>
>>>> Jena
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> Lucene.NET
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> NPanday
>>>
>>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>>
>>>> Nuvem
>>>
>>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>>
>>>> OpenNLP
>>>
>>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>>
>>>> PhotArk
>>>
>>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>>
>>>> SIS
>>>
>>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>>
>>>> Stanbol
>>>
>>> Still no release?
>>>
>>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>>
>>>> VCL
>>>
>>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>>> Wink
>>>
>>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>>
>>>> Wookie
>>>
>>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>>> Zeta Components
>>>
>>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
On 31 January 2012 05:34, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
<ch...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
> that you think I've missed.
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
Thanks Chris...
I'm concerned that a mentor is writing the report. It should be the
podling members themselves (with mentor guidance) - nevertheless -
thank you Chris.
"2. Test coverage of the code has to be increased significantly."
Doesn't really seem to be a barrier to graduation, quite the opposite
in fact. I replaced it with "Create a regular and predictable release
process and schedule" - if the community doesn't like that then go
edit it.
Changed "We don't have a ton of diversity in response to Jukka's query
on #3" to "Whilst our community is reasonably large and active we do
not, at present, have significant diversity." (my reasoning is that
board members may not have read Jukka's mail. Similarly I changed
"Regarding Jukka's query on the 0.2 release candidate" to "The 0.2
release candidate"
I've signed off.
Ross
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
>> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
>> this months reports for your project - see below
>>
>> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
>> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
>> then time to edit it.
>>
>> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
>> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>>
>> Ross
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
>> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
>> Subject: Questions for projects
>> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>
>> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
>> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
>> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
>> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
>> the February reports on key issues.
>>
>>> Airavata
>>
>> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
>> diverse is your community now?
>>
>> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>>
>>> Ambari
>>
>> How has CTR worked for you?
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>
>>> Amber
>>
>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>>
>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
>> University of Newcastle"?
>>
>>> Clerezza
>>
>> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>>
>> Any other issues before graduation?
>>
>>> DeltaSpike
>>
>> How is the Git repository working for you?
>>
>>> Droids
>>
>> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>>
>> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>>
>>> HISE
>>
>> Result of the retirement vote.
>>
>>> Jena
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>>> Lucene.NET
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>>> NPanday
>>
>> When can I vote on your graduation?
>>
>>> Nuvem
>>
>> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>>
>>> OpenNLP
>>
>> Congratulations on graduation!
>>
>>> PhotArk
>>
>> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>>
>>> SIS
>>
>> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>>
>>> Stanbol
>>
>> Still no release?
>>
>> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
>> report are not blockers for graduation.
>>
>>> VCL
>>
>> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>>> Wink
>>
>> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
>> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>>
>>> Wookie
>>
>> What's blocking you from graduating?
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>>> Zeta Components
>>
>> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
>> Programme Leader (Open Development)
>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: Board report dueFwd: Questions for projects
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hi Everyone,
I've drafted a report. Please contribute to the report and add in anything
that you think I've missed.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
Cheers,
Chris
On Jan 30, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Your board reports are due, Jukka on the IPMC has had a look through
> the last reports and has a few items he feels need to be addressed in
> this months reports for your project - see below
>
> If you've not already drafted your report you need to do so *now* - if
> your report does not cover the questions asked of your project below
> then time to edit it.
>
> If you have written a report I intend to review them soon, so please
> be sure to have them in the wiki ASAP
>
> Ross
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>
> Date: 30 January 2012 17:32
> Subject: Questions for projects
> To: general <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>
> I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
> information of all the projects scheduled to report in February
> (excluding new projects on monthly schedule). Here are a few questions
> or comments for each project. Hopefully they're helpful in focusing
> the February reports on key issues.
>
>> Airavata
>
> Only point 3 in your last report is a real graduation issue. How
> diverse is your community now?
>
> What happened with the release candidate mentioned in the last report?
>
>> Ambari
>
> How has CTR worked for you?
>
> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>
>> Amber
>
> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last report?
>
> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> University of Newcastle"?
>
>> Clerezza
>
> Have you made a release yet? If not, what's the blocker?
>
> Any other issues before graduation?
>
>> DeltaSpike
>
> How is the Git repository working for you?
>
>> Droids
>
> Any progress on getting more people to contribute?
>
> I'm seeing a significant drop in list activity since December. What's up?
>
>> HISE
>
> Result of the retirement vote.
>
>> Jena
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
>> Lucene.NET
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
>> NPanday
>
> When can I vote on your graduation?
>
>> Nuvem
>
> I don't see too much activity in the last five months. What's up?
>
>> OpenNLP
>
> Congratulations on graduation!
>
>> PhotArk
>
> I notice the discussions about a new direction. What's next?
>
>> SIS
>
> Do you have a plan for reviving the project?
>
>> Stanbol
>
> Still no release?
>
> Any other issues before graduation? Points 1b and 1c in your last
> report are not blockers for graduation.
>
>> VCL
>
> What's the status with the issue of university approval of the CLAs?
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
>> Wink
>
> Looks like you're discussing ideas to increase commit activity. Any
> concrete actions you're taking on this?
>
>> Wookie
>
> What's blocking you from graduating?
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
>> Zeta Components
>
> How diverse is your currently active committer-base?
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> --
> Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
> Programme Leader (Open Development)
> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++