You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by "Fernando (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org> on 2007/10/31 16:50:51 UTC

[jira] Closed: (XERCESC-1755) Abstract types in substitution group

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1755?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Fernando closed XERCESC-1755.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

MIsunderstanding with schemas. No such a bug.

> Abstract types in substitution group
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESC-1755
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1755
>             Project: Xerces-C++
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>         Environment: Unix - Linux (SUSE)
>            Reporter: Fernando
>
> I wish to report a bug that, to my understanding, creates a problem of compatibility with XML 1.0.
> Let it be a substitution group, which basic type is an abstract type A. Let it be a member B of that substitution group, which happen to be an abstract type too. Obviously, the second abstract type B is no a final type; this second abstract type B must be substituted by other final valid types.
> The reason for including the second abstract B as part of the substituion group for abstract type A is to somehow structure and hierarchise the whole substitution group.
> The bug I wish to report is that the second abstract type B produces a problem, since it is not allowed to be part of any substitution group.
> According to XML 1.0 recommendation (that Xerces is supposed to be complaiance with), an abstract type present in a substitution group should not be a problem, since there is no restriction for this.
> Could someone please check if this problem with Xerces is actually a bug to be solved in next version? Otherwise, could someone please let me know in which part of the XML 1.0 recommendation there is any constrain to abstract types as part of substitution groups?
> Thanks a lot.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org