You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "Rob Godfrey (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/08 13:08:42 UTC

[jira] [Created] (QPID-5615) [Java Broker] Broker and VirtualHost should use the same API for configuration stores

Rob Godfrey created QPID-5615:
---------------------------------

             Summary: [Java Broker] Broker and VirtualHost should use the same API for configuration stores
                 Key: QPID-5615
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5615
             Project: Qpid
          Issue Type: Sub-task
          Components: Java Broker
            Reporter: Rob Godfrey
            Assignee: Rob Godfrey


Currently there are two different interfaces for the persisting of configured object, one which is used by objects that live directly under the broker, and one which is used by objects underneath the virtual host.

The two APIs should be unified, the recovery process should me made generic, and a standardised way of differentiating between objects which inherit their parents store and those which manage their own should be made (Broker and VirtualHost should not be special-cased in any store logic).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org