You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Stefan Hoffmeister (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/10/09 06:27:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-8999) org.apache.kafka.common.utils.Utils.delete masks errors encountered during processing

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16947386#comment-16947386 ] 

Stefan Hoffmeister commented on KAFKA-8999:
-------------------------------------------

Note: Removed "visitFileFailed and" from above, because implementation there seems to be correct.

> org.apache.kafka.common.utils.Utils.delete masks errors encountered during processing
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-8999
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8999
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: streams
>            Reporter: Stefan Hoffmeister
>            Priority: Major
>
> The implementation of apache.kafka.common.utils.Utils.delete masks any errors it encounters during recursive deletes of a directory.
> [https://github.com/apache/kafka/blob/2.4/clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/utils/Utils.java#L748] is implemented such that for postVisitDirectory on SimpleFileVisitor any _unknown_ exception information present is simply discarded.
> At the very least, these exceptions should be logged at TRACE level, to be able to determine the root cause of any such failures.
> Beyond logging, it might be worthwhile reviewing whether ignoring an exception flagged on postVisitDirectory is correct, as that very exception might prevent the visited directory from being deleted.
> This relates indirectly to debugging KAFKA-6647, where the masking of errors here effectively hides why Kafka Streams sometimes throws DirectoryNotEmptyException (there is analysis on KAFKA-6647 why this may be the case - fixing this defect here would at least provide sufficient error context information)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)