You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/26 19:59:20 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-180) More real world benchmarks

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

angela resolved OAK-180.
------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.0)
                   0.18

let's open specific issues if we find issues that don't have real-life benchmarks.

> More real world benchmarks
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-180
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-180
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: bench
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>             Fix For: 0.18
>
>
> While the tests are oak-bench are good, they are not very close to real world scenarios. Specially, we need tests with more nodes (for example 15 million nodes), and a more complex node structure, and more complex operations (read operations, write operations, fulltext index, queries, and access rights). It doesn't need to be very complex, but at least closer to the reality. 
> I'm thinking about something of what TPC-C is for databases, but with content management operations instead of order-entry. But that's a longer term goal.
> The goal of the test is to detect problem areas in our implementation (so this isn't just about scalability).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)