You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@spark.apache.org by Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> on 2016/01/26 23:00:39 UTC
Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
quarterly release as usual?
Thanks
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Mark Hamstra <ma...@clearstorydata.com>.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote:
> I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
> move the default build to 2.11.
>
> See this discussion for more detail
>
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
> <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to
> Scala
> > 2.11 with Spark 2.0?
> >
> > Regards
> > Deenar
> >
> > On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify
> doing
> >> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann
> >> <da...@teamaol.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during
> the
> >>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks thats all i needed
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> >>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> >>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> >>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
> >>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> >>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
> >>>>> > Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@spark.apache.org
>
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>.
Its already underway: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote:
> I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
> move the default build to 2.11.
>
> See this discussion for more detail
>
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
> <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to
> Scala
> > 2.11 with Spark 2.0?
> >
> > Regards
> > Deenar
> >
> > On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify
> doing
> >> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann
> >> <da...@teamaol.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during
> the
> >>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks thats all i needed
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> >>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> >>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> >>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
> >>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> >>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
> >>>>> > Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>.
Its already underway: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote:
> I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
> move the default build to 2.11.
>
> See this discussion for more detail
>
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
> <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to
> Scala
> > 2.11 with Spark 2.0?
> >
> > Regards
> > Deenar
> >
> > On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify
> doing
> >> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann
> >> <da...@teamaol.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during
> the
> >>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks thats all i needed
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> >>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> >>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> >>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
> >>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> >>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
> >>>>> > Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Mark Hamstra <ma...@clearstorydata.com>.
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com> wrote:
> I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
> move the default build to 2.11.
>
> See this discussion for more detail
>
> http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
> <de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to
> Scala
> > 2.11 with Spark 2.0?
> >
> > Regards
> > Deenar
> >
> > On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify
> doing
> >> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann
> >> <da...@teamaol.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during
> the
> >>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks thats all i needed
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> >>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> >>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> >>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
> >>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> >>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
> >>>>> > Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@spark.apache.org
>
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com>.
I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
move the default build to 2.11.
See this discussion for more detail
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
<de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to Scala
> 2.11 with Spark 2.0?
>
> Regards
> Deenar
>
> On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing
>> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann
>> <da...@teamaol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the
>>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> thanks thats all i needed
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
>>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
>>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
>>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
>>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
>>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@spark.apache.org
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Jakob Odersky <ja...@odersky.com>.
I'm not an authoritative source but I think it is indeed the plan to
move the default build to 2.11.
See this discussion for more detail
http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/A-proposal-for-Spark-2-0-td15122.html
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Deenar Toraskar
<de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to Scala
> 2.11 with Spark 2.0?
>
> Regards
> Deenar
>
> On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing
>> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann
>> <da...@teamaol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the
>>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> thanks thats all i needed
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
>>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
>>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
>>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
>>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
>>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
>>>>> > Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@spark.apache.org
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Deenar Toraskar <de...@gmail.com>.
A related question. Are the plans to move the default Spark builds to Scala
2.11 with Spark 2.0?
Regards
Deenar
On 27 January 2016 at 19:55, Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>
wrote:
> We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing
> one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann <
> daniel.siegmann@teamaol.com> wrote:
>
>> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the
>> additional time for bug fixes and such?
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks thats all i needed
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
>>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
>>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
>>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
>>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
>>>> > quarterly release as usual?
>>>> > Thanks
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>.
We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing
one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann <
daniel.siegmann@teamaol.com> wrote:
> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the
> additional time for bug fixes and such?
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks thats all i needed
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
>>> > quarterly release as usual?
>>> > Thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Michael Armbrust <mi...@databricks.com>.
We do maintenance releases on demand when there is enough to justify doing
one. I'm hoping to cut 1.6.1 soon, but have not had time yet.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Daniel Siegmann <
daniel.siegmann@teamaol.com> wrote:
> Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the
> additional time for bug fixes and such?
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
>
>> thanks thats all i needed
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
>>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
>>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
>>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
>>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
>>> > quarterly release as usual?
>>> > Thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Daniel Siegmann <da...@teamaol.com>.
Will there continue to be monthly releases on the 1.6.x branch during the
additional time for bug fixes and such?
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
> thanks thats all i needed
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
>> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
>> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
>> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
>> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
>> > quarterly release as usual?
>> > Thanks
>>
>
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>.
thanks thats all i needed
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> > quarterly release as usual?
> > Thanks
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com>.
thanks thats all i needed
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
> freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
> officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
> conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
> That's basically an extra 3 month period.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
> > Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> > quarterly release as usual?
> > Thanks
>
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>.
I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
That's basically an extra 3 month period.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
> Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> quarterly release as usual?
> Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@spark.apache.org
Re: Spark 2.0.0 release plan
Posted by Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com>.
I think it will come significantly later -- or else we'd be at code
freeze for 2.x in a few days. I haven't heard anyone discuss this
officially but had batted around May or so instead informally in
conversation. Does anyone have a particularly strong opinion on that?
That's basically an extra 3 month period.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Wiki+Homepage
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Koert Kuipers <ko...@tresata.com> wrote:
> Is the idea that spark 2.0 comes out roughly 3 months after 1.6? So
> quarterly release as usual?
> Thanks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@spark.apache.org