You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "zeroshade (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/07/26 16:04:03 UTC

[GitHub] [arrow] zeroshade opened a new pull request, #36895: GH-36893: [Go][Flight] Expose underlying protobuf definitions

zeroshade opened a new pull request, #36895:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36895

   ### What changes are included in this PR?
   Shifting generated protobuf code for flight/flightsql to have the path `arrow/flight/gen/flight` rather than `arrow/flight/internal/flight` so that they are exposed and exported.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [arrow] zeroshade merged pull request #36895: GH-36893: [Go][Flight] Expose underlying protobuf definitions

Posted by "zeroshade (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
zeroshade merged PR #36895:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36895


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [arrow] conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on pull request #36895: GH-36893: [Go][Flight] Expose underlying protobuf definitions

Posted by "conbench-apache-arrow[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #36895:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36895#issuecomment-1663074122

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 7c0451c71ef68840b4642e53857b522160c075f4.
   
   There were 2 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `arm64-t4g-linux-compute` at [2023-07-26 20:59:41Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/78eb3b4b86c048c5ba17de3da184b525...3bd4cbbe7975499a9e698927b23b5891/)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-22, scale_factor=1](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064c192fba6f79238000db0cba685ed6...064c197638e97338800004ecf2b971ef)
   
   - Commit Run on `ursa-i9-9960x` at [2023-08-02 20:16:22Z](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/runs/ad5a3542e4104e00a2a1e3ac2732813b...c270409e0df24244b1329b422ac79918/)
     - [`dataframe-to-table` (Python) with dataset=type_integers](http://conbench.ursa.dev/compare/benchmarks/064caa029d687ed88000a22beedf4447...064cabad812b76eb8000e469866e872c)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/15571167899) has more details. It also includes information about possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org