You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org> on 2009/06/05 20:58:10 UTC
1.6.3 Status
As many of you know, 1.6.3 has kept being pushed back over the past
couple of days. It pains me to have that happen, but I think holding
it is a good thing, because we're waiting on a couple of issues:
* The DoS attack fixed by the latest version of apr-util, which will
be included in the deps for 1.6.3.
* Neels's fix for a 1.6.2 regression in svnsync (see r37939).
The first one has been fixed, and there is a pending item in STATUS.
The second has pending comments from Paul, but as soon as those are
addressed and we get that group merged to 1.6.x, I think we'll be good
to cut 1.6.3.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2359839
Re: 1.6.3 Status
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:37 AM, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
>> Blair Zajac wrote:
>>> which causes no -ldb-4.6 to be given by apu-1-config.
>>> So the two solutions are to pass an argument to --with-berkeley-
>>> db, which I did,
>>> or pass --disable-util-dso to apr-util's configure.
>>
>> I tried '--with-berkeleyp-db=/usr/local/bdb-4.7.25/' to configure
>> apr-util,
>
> I meant '--with-berkeley-db' not '--with-berkeleyp-db'
Look at configure --help to see the format. You need something like
--with-berkeley-db=:db.h/usr/local/bdb-4.7.25/include/:/usr/local/
bdb-4.7.25/lib/:db-4.7
Blair
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360675
Re: 1.6.3 Status
Posted by Senthil Kumaran S <se...@collab.net>.
Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Blair Zajac wrote:
> > which causes no -ldb-4.6 to be given by apu-1-config.
>> So the two solutions are to pass an argument to --with-berkeley-db, which I did,
>> or pass --disable-util-dso to apr-util's configure.
>
> I tried '--with-berkeleyp-db=/usr/local/bdb-4.7.25/' to configure apr-util,
I meant '--with-berkeley-db' not '--with-berkeleyp-db'
--
Senthil Kumaran S
http://www.stylesen.org/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360617
Re: 1.6.3 Status
Posted by Senthil Kumaran S <se...@collab.net>.
Blair Zajac wrote:
> which causes no -ldb-4.6 to be given by apu-1-config.
>
> So the two solutions are to pass an argument to --with-berkeley-db, which I did,
> or pass --disable-util-dso to apr-util's configure.
I tried '--with-berkeleyp-db=/usr/local/bdb-4.7.25/' to configure apr-util,
still it was unable to get berkeley db :( When I look at the config.log, I
could see it was looking for db47/db.h which I could not find inside the above
mentioned location of bdb installation. So I ran configure '--with-dbm=db47',
still it was unable to compile properly.
This breaks my subversion builds in my home computer systems.
--
Senthil Kumaran S
http://www.stylesen.org/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360616
Re: 1.6.3 Status
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> As many of you know, 1.6.3 has kept being pushed back over the past
> couple of days. It pains me to have that happen, but I think holding
> it is a good thing, because we're waiting on a couple of issues:
>
> * The DoS attack fixed by the latest version of apr-util, which will
> be included in the deps for 1.6.3.
> * Neels's fix for a 1.6.2 regression in svnsync (see r37939).
>
> The first one has been fixed, and there is a pending item in STATUS.
> The second has pending comments from Paul, but as soon as those are
> addressed and we get that group merged to 1.6.x, I think we'll be good
> to cut 1.6.3.
Noting for people that I did a fresh compile on Centos 4 and 5 tonight of 1.6.2
with apr 1.3.5 and apr-util 1.3.7 and if you specify --with-berkeley-db then
configure fails because it can't find any Berkeley libraries at link time.
The cause appears to be this change in apr-util
*) Introduce DSO handling of the db, gdbm and ndbm drivers, so these are
loaded as .so's on first demand, unless --disable-util-dso is configured.
[William Rowe]
which causes no -ldb-4.6 to be given by apu-1-config.
So the two solutions are to pass an argument to --with-berkeley-db, which I did,
or pass --disable-util-dso to apr-util's configure.
Regards,
Blair
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2360055
Re: 1.6.3 Status
Posted by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de>.
Neels Janosch Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> As many of you know, 1.6.3 has kept being pushed back over the past
>> couple of days. It pains me to have that happen, but I think holding
>> it is a good thing, because we're waiting on a couple of issues:
>>
>> * The DoS attack fixed by the latest version of apr-util, which will
>> be included in the deps for 1.6.3.
>> * Neels's fix for a 1.6.2 regression in svnsync (see r37939).
>>
>> The first one has been fixed, and there is a pending item in STATUS.
>> The second has pending comments from Paul, but as soon as those are
>> addressed and we get that group merged to 1.6.x, I think we'll be good
>> to cut 1.6.3.
>
> Hey, isn't that the wrong way 'round?
>
> The 1.6.2 regression is fixed and has pending item in STATUS, see -r37939.
>
> And the other has the other... ;)
>
> ~Neels
Sorry, I was too quick again. Hyrum was right after all.
Added r37946, updated STATUS.
Hope it's resolved now.
~Neels
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2359887
Re: 1.6.3 Status
Posted by Neels Janosch Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de>.
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> As many of you know, 1.6.3 has kept being pushed back over the past
> couple of days. It pains me to have that happen, but I think holding
> it is a good thing, because we're waiting on a couple of issues:
>
> * The DoS attack fixed by the latest version of apr-util, which will
> be included in the deps for 1.6.3.
> * Neels's fix for a 1.6.2 regression in svnsync (see r37939).
>
> The first one has been fixed, and there is a pending item in STATUS.
> The second has pending comments from Paul, but as soon as those are
> addressed and we get that group merged to 1.6.x, I think we'll be good
> to cut 1.6.3.
Hey, isn't that the wrong way 'round?
The 1.6.2 regression is fixed and has pending item in STATUS, see -r37939.
And the other has the other... ;)
~Neels
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2359873