You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/07/29 07:54:57 UTC

[GitHub] [iceberg] aokolnychyi opened a new issue #1260: Expose time travelling using multi-part identifiers

aokolnychyi opened a new issue #1260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/1260


   Until we have proper SQL support for time travelling in Spark, we should expose it using multi-part identifiers.
   
   Background [here](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Nf8c16R2hj4lSc-4sQg4oiUUV_F4XqZKth1woEo6TN8/edit?disco=AAAAGvqh7BA).


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org


[GitHub] [iceberg] rdsr commented on issue #1260: Expose time travelling using multi-part identifiers

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
rdsr commented on issue #1260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/1260#issuecomment-665434507


   I believe this ticket to address time travel by both `snapshot-id` and `as-of-timestamp`?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org


[GitHub] [iceberg] aokolnychyi commented on issue #1260: Expose time travelling using multi-part identifiers

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
aokolnychyi commented on issue #1260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/1260#issuecomment-666925127


   @rsdr, ideally, yes. We will need to distinguish them, though. I think `as-of-timestamp` should be a properly formatted timestamp and not the number of seconds since the epoch. 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org


[GitHub] [iceberg] rdsr edited a comment on issue #1260: Expose time travelling using multi-part identifiers

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
rdsr edited a comment on issue #1260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/1260#issuecomment-665434507


   I believe this ticket is to address time travel by both `snapshot-id` and `as-of-timestamp`?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org