You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> on 2009/11/17 07:23:33 UTC

Time for 3.3.0 beta?

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155#c162

I just committed the new scores and several manual score adjustments as 
noted here.

Time for 3.3.0 beta?  Anything else we should do first?

Is this where Justin cuts a tarball and calls for a vote?

Warren Togami
wtogami@redhat.com

Re: Time for 3.3.0 beta?

Posted by Michael Parker <pa...@pobox.com>.

On Nov 17, 2009, at 9:48 AM, Justin Mason wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 13:36, Mark Martinec <Mark.Martinec 
> +sa@ijs.si> wrote:
>
>> About the 6203, I have some stats collected. Also the AWL race  
>> condition:
>>  https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4642#c1
>> is worrying me. I'm using a workaround (attempt INSERT first, and
>> if that fails do the UPDATE), but the change is nontrivial, and  
>> depends
>> on a unique key constraint failing to work properly. If you like,
>> I can submit it for consideration - can be reverted later if not  
>> approved.
>> An alternative is to use ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, but that seems not
>> to be liked according to Bug 5998.
>
> If you can provoke Michael into a response ;)  and get agreement,  
> then whatever
> you guys decide is good.   However I don't think it is safe to delay
> beta release
> for this, as it's a pretty thorny problem AFAICT.
>

Ok, consider me provoked :)

Commented on bug 5998, my objection wasn't the ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE  
call, it was on the fact that it would make master-master setups work.

As to the concurrency issues, I learned just enough plpgsql to come up  
with those functions and have probably forgotten it, someone with  
better PostgreSQL skills needs to pick up the ball and figure things  
out.

Michael

Re: Time for 3.3.0 beta?

Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>.

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 17:17, Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> wrote:

> It seems that we are now ready for 3.3.0 beta1.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6187
> This is the last bug, commit needs review.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6144
> Release notes for review
>
> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
> New scores committed, manual tweaks can still be made


BTW I think we need to ensure the RescoreMassCheck process has been followed
-- cf bug 6155 -- before a beta is releaseable...


-- 
--j.

Re: Time for 3.3.0 beta?

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.

> Hmm, attempting to follow the process in build/README.  It seems I don't
> have access to people.apache.org.  Who do I need to talk to about this?

The account on minotaur was supposedly created for you on 2009-10-03.
To reset a password you may need to contact infra:



Date: 3 Oct 2009 03:05:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20...@minotaur.apache.org>
From: root@apache.org
To: private@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [NOTICE] Account created: Warren Togami Jr. (wtogami)

Hi,

The account 'wtogami' was created for Warren Togami Jr. as requested
by this PMC.

Please grant karma to the projects in your domain you wish
the user to have commit to.


The Apache Infrastructure Team

Re: Time for 3.3.0 beta?

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.

Daryl wrote:
> - Theo Van Dinter
> - Duncan Findlay
> - Michael Parker
> - Daniel Quinlan 
> I believe they all know the pass-phrase (in addition to Justin).  I
> think Malte S. Stretz might know it too.

This is a good opportunity for a key transition, as recommended
by ASF.  See Bug 6223 and links therein.  One of the people
in the know of the current distro-signing key should create a
new one according to recommendations, and sign it with the old one.

  Mark