You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@manifoldcf.apache.org by Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> on 2012/05/04 14:36:21 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE] Graduation resolution for ManifoldCF
Five binding +1 votes, two mentors included, no -1's, >72 hours. Vote passes!
Karl
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Shinichiro Abe
<sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me :)
>
> Shinichiro Abe
>
> On 2012/05/01, at 21:18, Karl Wright wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Jukka, I'd be honored to take on the role of VP in a
>> ManifoldCF top-level project.
>>
>> Incorporating Jukka's invaluable advice, I've updated the proposed
>> resolution, and am opening a vote on it. Please vote +1 if you agree
>> that this is the resolution that should be presented, in total,
>> including myself in the role of Vice President, or -1 if you see
>> changes you would like to make (or if you'd like to nominate someone
>> else and hold a formal vote on the VP role).
>>
>> ======
>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
>> of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
>> establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
>> maintenance of open-source software for transferring content between
>> repositories or search indexes, for distribution at no charge to the public;
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management Committee
>> (PMC), to be known as the "Apache ManifoldCF Project", be and hereby is
>> established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the Apache ManifoldCF Project be and hereby is
>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of open-source software for
>> transferring content between repositories or search indexes, for distribution
>> at no charge to the public.
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, ManifoldCF" be and hereby
>> is created, the person holding such office to serve at the direction
>> of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache ManifoldCF
>> Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of the
>> projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache ManifoldCF
>> Project; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
>> appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache ManifoldCF
>> Project:
>>
>> * Shinichiro Abe (shinichiro@apache.org)
>> * Erlend Garåsen (ridder@apache.org)
>> * Piergiorgio Lucidi (piergiorgio@apache.org)
>> * Hitoshi Ozawa (hozawa@apache.org)
>> * Tommaso Teofili (tommaso@apache.org)
>> * Simon Willnauer (simonw@apache.org)
>> * Karl Wright (kwright@apache.org)
>> * Jukka Zitting (jukka@apache.org)
>>
>> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Karl Wright be
>> appointed to the office of Vice President, ManifoldCF, to serve in
>> accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of Directors
>> and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death, resignation, retirement,
>> removal or disqualification, or until a successor is appointed; and be
>> it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ManifoldCF Project be and hereby is
>> tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to encourage open
>> development and increased participation in the ManifoldCF Project; and
>> be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that the initial Apache ManifoldCF Project be and hereby is
>> tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator
>> ManifoldCF podling; and be it further
>>
>> RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache Incubator
>> ManifoldCF podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator PMC are
>> hereafter discharged.
>> ======
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> Thanks again for the vote of confidence!
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Karl Wright <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Looks like we missed a step; we need a graduation resolution for the
>>>> board to vote on. Here's my proposal, basically copied from Apache
>>>> Chemistry's, but I have a question. Since no distinction is made
>>>> between the PPMC members and committers in this resolution, and since
>>>> many of the original committers/IPMC members have become inactive, and
>>>> others have not yet been voted in as PPMC members, how should we deal
>>>> with that?
>>>
>>> * Overall the resolution looks good, though note my comment on the scope below.
>>>
>>> * As discussed before, I don't think making a distinction between
>>> committers and (P)PMC members is useful for us. IMO such a setup only
>>> makes sense for "umbrella" projects like the Incubator and Lucene
>>> before it split out most of its subprojects. So my recommendation
>>> would be to make all (still active) committers also PMC members and
>>> stick with that policy going forward.
>>>
>>> * As for inactive people, you're already doing a good job asking them
>>> whether they still want to be involved. In case someone doesn't reply
>>> and hasn't shown up on the lists over the last year or so, it's fine
>>> to simply drop them from the resolution for lack of response.
>>>
>>>> Also, do we need to vote on who the vice president will
>>>> be? I believe we do... but maybe we can do this as part of the vote
>>>> on the resolution itself?
>>>
>>> You're already doing all the stuff a VP should be doing, and more, so
>>> I hereby nominate you to be the VP, Apache ManifoldCF. We can have a
>>> vote if other nominations are made, or consider you selected by lazy
>>> consensus otherwise.
>>>
>>>> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
>>>> of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
>>>> establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
>>>> maintenance of open-source software providing a framework for transferring
>>>> content from source content repositories to target repositories or indexes,
>>>> including a security model permitting target repositories to enforce source
>>>> repository security, for distribution at no charge to the public;
>>>
>>> This is a pretty lengthy scope definition. Can we simplify it a bit?
>>>
>>> For example something like: "... open-source software for transferring
>>> content between repositories or search indexes". The details of how
>>> this is achieved (framework, security model, etc.) are IMHO best left
>>> outside the scope to allow more freedom down the line for the project
>>> to evolve.
>>>
>>>> RESOLVED, that the Apache ManifoldCF Project be and hereby is
>>>> responsible for the creation and maintenance of software providing a
>>>> framework for transferring content from source content repositories to
>>>> target repositories or indexes, including a security model permitting target
>>>> repositories to enforce source repository security, for distribution
>>>> at no charge to the public.
>>>
>>> This should also be updated as discussed above.
>>>
>>> PS. If you don't mind, I'd be happy to stay on board the new
>>> ManifoldCF PMC at least for some time to help out with the transition
>>> to TLP.
>>>
>>> BR,
>>>
>>> Jukka Zitting
>