You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/10/13 14:48:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-15679) LevelDB: Consider replacing of
serizalization via org.fusesource.hawtbuf:hawtbuf with Jackson
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17213151#comment-17213151 ]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-15679:
-------------------------------------
Yeah but binary data is harder to represent in json. So this would only work for payloads that are text based, or for binary then it would need to be represented as some kind of blob.
But a pluggable serializer would be nice. And yeah its also good to get rid of hawtbuf as that project is EOL.
> LevelDB: Consider replacing of serizalization via org.fusesource.hawtbuf:hawtbuf with Jackson
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-15679
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-15679
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-leveldb
> Affects Versions: 3.5.0
> Reporter: Jiri Ondrusek
> Assignee: Jiri Ondrusek
> Priority: Major
>
> Current implementation of serialization is based on `org.fusesource.hawtbuf:hawtbuf` and java object serialization. It would be better to use Jackson instead. Here are some reasons:
> # Serialization with Jackson is faster (see [http://rick-hightower.blogspot.com/2014/04/which-is-faster-java-object.html])
> # Camel-quarkus can not use java object serialization in native (see [https://github.com/oracle/graal/issues/460]) Current workaround uses Jackson instead.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)