You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Thomas Mueller (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/03 06:29:01 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6710) CommitMitigated merge policy should
not reduce performance significantly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16189320#comment-16189320 ]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-6710:
-------------------------------------
[~teofili] not sure if you are aware of this, but it looks like performance degradation was not because of the CommitMitigated merge policy, but because of OAK-6717 (as far as I understand, [~chetanm] please correct me if I'm wrong). So possibly this issue here can be resolved "won't fix"?
> CommitMitigated merge policy should not reduce performance significantly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6710
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6710
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
> Affects Versions: 1.7.7
> Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
> Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
> Labels: performance, scalability
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> While running performance tests (internally) using latest unstable releases having {{CommitMitigatedTieredMergePolicy}} we observed significant drop in performance (OAK-6704).
> The policy, although bad for performance, showed dramatic drop in churn created in data store size. So, clearly, OAK-5192 did what it intended to do.
> Opening this issue to factor in drop in performance and then set the default back to {{CommitMitigatedTieredMergePolicy}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)