You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/03/31 22:27:47 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] ibzib commented on pull request #14392: [BEAM-9514] For aggregate return type, use Calcite type inference ins…

ibzib commented on pull request #14392:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14392#issuecomment-811507032


   > Are there tests we can turn on to make sure this doesn't regress? (Or followup CLs we can merge?
   
   LOGICAL_AND is an example of a function that did not conform to the previous assumption. But it will require more work before we can merge it (#13817).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org