You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@etch.apache.org by "scott comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> on 2009/01/28 22:06:34 UTC
i about done with java refactoring...
and remember now that i forgot to ask what we should do about the etch
for csharp package names.
while java runtime package names are now org.apache.etch.util.* and
org.apache.etch.bindings.java.*,
the csharp names have always been simpler: Etch.*
It seems like they should be Org.Apache.Etch.Bindings.Csharp.*
this allows other csharp bindings than just the one we have.
scott out
Re: i about done with java refactoring...
Posted by "scott comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com>.
i'm done with the major structural changes. you may fool with the java
code and build scripts. i'm
still holding the lock on the csharp binding runtime, csharp tests and
examples, and all the csprojs.
scott out
James Dixson wrote:
> I agree. I think we should rename the C# packages as well it makes sense.
>
> .. Are you about to release your virtual lock on trunk ... Others would like
> to check-in code too :-)
>
> --
> James
>
>
>
> On 1/28/09 3:06 PM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>
>> and remember now that i forgot to ask what we should do about the etch
>> for csharp package names.
>>
>> while java runtime package names are now org.apache.etch.util.* and
>> org.apache.etch.bindings.java.*,
>> the csharp names have always been simpler: Etch.*
>>
>> It seems like they should be Org.Apache.Etch.Bindings.Csharp.*
>>
>> this allows other csharp bindings than just the one we have.
>>
>> scott out
>>
>>
> 6
>
>
>
Re: i about done with java refactoring...
Posted by James Dixson <ja...@cisco.com>.
I agree. I think we should rename the C# packages as well it makes sense.
.. Are you about to release your virtual lock on trunk ... Others would like
to check-in code too :-)
--
James
On 1/28/09 3:06 PM, "Scott Comer (sccomer)" <sc...@cisco.com> wrote:
> and remember now that i forgot to ask what we should do about the etch
> for csharp package names.
>
> while java runtime package names are now org.apache.etch.util.* and
> org.apache.etch.bindings.java.*,
> the csharp names have always been simpler: Etch.*
>
> It seems like they should be Org.Apache.Etch.Bindings.Csharp.*
>
> this allows other csharp bindings than just the one we have.
>
> scott out
>
6