You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@struts.apache.org by Dakota Jack <cr...@gmail.com> on 2004/11/16 01:42:16 UTC
JerichoFaces ?
Instead of having the Java ServerFaces controller handle both the
relationship to the controller and to the model from the view, what if
we employed the Jericho update to Struts 2.0 and added as an option a
JerichoFaces that only interfaced with the model, having a view
controller that did not take over the controller function of the "MVC"
pattern, e.g.
view <==> contoller <==> model <==> view <==> etc. or
controller
view model
See http://131.191.32.112:8080/ for a diagram.
Jack
--
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
~Native Proverb~
"Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
Re: JerichoFaces ?
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@gmail.com>.
Jack,
Two things you might want to do ...
* Note that several of the Struts developers are currently
at ApacheCon in Las Vegas this week (not me, alas, due
to scheduling conflicts).
* Migrate discussions like this over to the developer list,
since that's where decisions on the future will actually
be made.
Personally, I'm underwhelmed by the technical arguments made against a
View Helper design pattern so far, so I'm not particularly interested
(personally) in Jericho or JerichoFaces as a solution to anything --
but who knows, some of the other developers might be.
Craig
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 16:42:16 -0800, Dakota Jack <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Instead of having the Java ServerFaces controller handle both the
> relationship to the controller and to the model from the view, what if
> we employed the Jericho update to Struts 2.0 and added as an option a
> JerichoFaces that only interfaced with the model, having a view
> controller that did not take over the controller function of the "MVC"
> pattern, e.g.
>
> view <==> contoller <==> model <==> view <==> etc. or
>
> controller
>
> view model
>
> See http://131.191.32.112:8080/ for a diagram.
>
> Jack
>
> --
> "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep."
>
> ~Native Proverb~
>
> "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows."
>
> ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@struts.apache.org