You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spark.apache.org by Patrick Wendell <pw...@gmail.com> on 2014/05/14 22:04:46 UTC

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 1.0.0 (rc5)

This vote is cancelled in favor of rc6.

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Patrick Wendell <pw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm cancelling this vote in favor of rc6.
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Sean Owen <so...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Patrick Wendell <pw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-1.0.0-rc5/
>>>
>>> Good news is that the sigs, MD5 and SHA are all correct.
>>>
>>> Tiny note: the Maven artifacts use SHA1, while the binary artifacts
>>> use SHA512, which took me a bit of head-scratching to figure out.
>>>
>>> If another RC comes out, I might suggest making it SHA1 everywhere?
>>> But there is nothing wrong with these signatures and checksums.
>>>
>>> Now to look at the contents...
>>
>> This is a bit of drudgery that probably needs to be done too: a review
>> of the LICENSE and NOTICE file. Having dumped the licenses of
>> dependencies, I don't believe these reflect all of the software that's
>> going to be distributed in 1.0.
>>
>> (Good news is there's no forbidden license stuff included AFAICT.)
>>
>> And good news is that NOTICE can be auto-generated, largely, with a
>> Maven plugin. This can be done manually for now.
>>
>> And there is a license plugin that will list all known licenses of
>> transitive dependencies so that LICENSE can be filled out fairly
>> easily.
>>
>> What say? want a JIRA with details?