You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by John Fleming <jo...@wa9als.com> on 2005/01/13 09:37:54 UTC

THANKS - Re: AWL problem??

> Bayes in the current version will not autolearn against itself (will
> not auto-learn as ham something it thought was spam, or v.v.) -- it
> might be a good enhancement to also have bayes look at AWL if active,
> and if AWL disagrees with the auto-learn judgment, then do not
> auto-learn.
>
> Looking at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3418,

Thanks Bob and Matt and others for the education.  SA never ceases to amaze 
me with it's intelligence.  I should've mentioned that I'm using v2.64, 
patiently awaiting 3+ to enter Debian testing (Sarge).  - John



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005

Re: THANKS - Re: AWL problem??

Posted by Chris Thielen <cm...@someone.dhs.org>.
Hi Chris,

Chris Thielen wrote:

> John Fleming wrote:
>
>>> Bayes in the current version will not autolearn against itself (will
>>> not auto-learn as ham something it thought was spam, or v.v.) -- it
>>> might be a good enhancement to also have bayes look at AWL if active,
>>> and if AWL disagrees with the auto-learn judgment, then do not
>>> auto-learn.
>>>
>>> Looking at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3418,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bob and Matt and others for the education.  SA never ceases to 
>> amaze me with it's intelligence.  I should've mentioned that I'm 
>> using v2.64, patiently awaiting 3+ to enter Debian testing (Sarge).  
>> - John
>
>
> I wouldn't hold my breath.  Since sarge is in release mode, you will 
> probably have better luck finding a backport.  I should also mention 
> that I'm using sarge and am still on 2.60-2!


Open slot "mouth".  Insert tab "foot".

Look what came across the wire today:
sone@ns1:~$ apt-cache policy spamassassin
spamassassin:
  Installed: 1:2.60-2
  Candidate: 1:2.60-2
  Version Table:
 *** 1:2.60-2 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     3.0.2-1 0
        900 http://http.us.debian.org sarge/main Packages
        600 http://http.us.debian.org unstable/main Packages

Thanks Duncan?

Re: THANKS - Re: AWL problem??

Posted by Chris Thielen <cm...@someone.dhs.org>.
John Fleming wrote:

>> Bayes in the current version will not autolearn against itself (will
>> not auto-learn as ham something it thought was spam, or v.v.) -- it
>> might be a good enhancement to also have bayes look at AWL if active,
>> and if AWL disagrees with the auto-learn judgment, then do not
>> auto-learn.
>>
>> Looking at http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3418,
>
>
> Thanks Bob and Matt and others for the education.  SA never ceases to 
> amaze me with it's intelligence.  I should've mentioned that I'm using 
> v2.64, patiently awaiting 3+ to enter Debian testing (Sarge).  - John

I wouldn't hold my breath.  Since sarge is in release mode, you will 
probably have better luck finding a backport.  I should also mention 
that I'm using sarge and am still on 2.60-2!