You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> on 2018/04/20 03:05:51 UTC
0.9.3 Release
So much for releasing early each month ;-)
I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale branch.
I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a release. We
will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale since
we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale will
result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should release
what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets. What do
others think?
The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a common
base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it could
wait until next month.
Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
Thoughts?
-Alex
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Please make the list and we’ll take the discussion from there.
> On May 17, 2018, at 2:01 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> anyway, now that build is working for me is a matter of making the list of
> package name changes if you like
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi,
jsonly build is finaly fixed.
Looking at the code fixed seems to me almost dead code and things very old
unused now.
as well I was not aware since is based on ANT and not maven, that I thought
all build process in Royale was based on Maven.
anyway, now that build is working for me is a matter of making the list of
package name changes if you like
thanks
2018-05-17 12:03 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Harbs,
> take into account that I don't use to setup ANT files, only Maven.
> ANT files needs to be done, I hope others can contribute that work.
>
> 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
>> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
>> <js:TextPromptBead>
>>
>> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
>>
>> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > You are right. I missed this.
>> >
>> > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>> >
>> >> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I think you missed one important point I
>> >> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
>> >> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
>> >> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
>> >>
>> >> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel
>> will be
>> >> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
>> you
>> >> can find it in the develop branch."
>> >>
>> >> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
>> >>
>> >> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
>> with
>> >> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
>> latest 2
>> >> months. I think this is crucial.
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Harbs,
take into account that I don't use to setup ANT files, only Maven.
ANT files needs to be done, I hope others can contribute that work.
2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
> <js:TextPromptBead>
>
> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
>
> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
>
> Harbs
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You are right. I missed this.
> >
> > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> >
> >> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think you missed one important point I
> >> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
> >> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
> >> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> >>
> >> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will
> be
> >> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
> you
> >> can find it in the develop branch."
> >>
> >> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> >>
> >> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
> with
> >> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest
> 2
> >> months. I think this is crucial.
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Harbs, just create a new thread from this. check it out! :)
2018-05-17 13:33 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> I see the following in the pom:
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.apache.royale.framework</groupId>
> <artifactId>Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Blue-Theme</artifactId>
> <version>0.9.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
> <type>swc</type>
> <scope>theme</scope>
> <classifier>js</classifier>
> </dependency>
>
> It looks like there’s no default theme for Jewel. Should that be fixed?
>
> How are themes specified to the compiler?
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh. I guess that’s why the styling did not work.
> >
> > Carlos, what compiler options are needed for Jewel?
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> >> On May 17, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is another issue. You cannot build those examples using IDE. I
> think
> >> we should raise on GitHub. I also cannot build those examples in
> Moonshine.
> >> Something needs to be configured. Probably some additional args for
> >> compiler related to theme etc.
> >>
> >> 2018-05-17 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> VSCode using asconfigc
> >>>
> >>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Harbs,
> >>>>
> >>>> How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Piotr
> >>>>
> >>>> 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
> >>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the
> blog
> >>>>> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
> >>>>> <js:TextPromptBead>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Harbs
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You are right. I missed this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org
> >>>>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think you missed one important point I
> >>>>>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using
> the
> >>>>>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without
> >>> all
> >>>>>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel
> >>> will
> >>>>> be
> >>>>>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the
> meanwhile
> >>>>> you
> >>>>>>> can find it in the develop branch."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can
> ship
> >>>>> with
> >>>>>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
> >>> latest
> >>>>> 2
> >>>>>>> months. I think this is crucial.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>
> >>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
> >>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
> >>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/
> >>> piotrzarzycki>>*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I see the following in the pom:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.royale.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Blue-Theme</artifactId>
<version>0.9.4-SNAPSHOT</version>
<type>swc</type>
<scope>theme</scope>
<classifier>js</classifier>
</dependency>
It looks like there’s no default theme for Jewel. Should that be fixed?
How are themes specified to the compiler?
> On May 17, 2018, at 2:26 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Oh. I guess that’s why the styling did not work.
>
> Carlos, what compiler options are needed for Jewel?
>
> Harbs
>
>> On May 17, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is another issue. You cannot build those examples using IDE. I think
>> we should raise on GitHub. I also cannot build those examples in Moonshine.
>> Something needs to be configured. Probably some additional args for
>> compiler related to theme etc.
>>
>> 2018-05-17 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> VSCode using asconfigc
>>>
>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Harbs,
>>>>
>>>> How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Piotr
>>>>
>>>> 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
>>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>>:
>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
>>>>> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
>>>>> <js:TextPromptBead>
>>>>>
>>>>> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
>>>>>
>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are right. I missed this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
>>>>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think you missed one important point I
>>>>>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
>>>>>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without
>>> all
>>>>>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel
>>> will
>>>>> be
>>>>>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
>>>>> you
>>>>>>> can find it in the develop branch."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
>>>>> with
>>>>>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
>>> latest
>>>>> 2
>>>>>>> months. I think this is crucial.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>
>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/
>>> piotrzarzycki>>*
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Oh. I guess that’s why the styling did not work.
Carlos, what compiler options are needed for Jewel?
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is another issue. You cannot build those examples using IDE. I think
> we should raise on GitHub. I also cannot build those examples in Moonshine.
> Something needs to be configured. Probably some additional args for
> compiler related to theme etc.
>
> 2018-05-17 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> VSCode using asconfigc
>>
>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Harbs,
>>>
>>> How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>> 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
>> harbs.lists@gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>>> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
>>>> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
>>>> <js:TextPromptBead>
>>>>
>>>> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
>>>>
>>>> Harbs
>>>>
>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You are right. I missed this.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
>>>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you missed one important point I
>>>>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
>>>>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without
>> all
>>>>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel
>> will
>>>> be
>>>>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
>>>> you
>>>>>> can find it in the develop branch."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
>>>> with
>>>>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
>> latest
>>>> 2
>>>>>> months. I think this is crucial.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
>> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/
>> piotrzarzycki>>*
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
This is another issue. You cannot build those examples using IDE. I think
we should raise on GitHub. I also cannot build those examples in Moonshine.
Something needs to be configured. Probably some additional args for
compiler related to theme etc.
2018-05-17 13:18 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> VSCode using asconfigc
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Harbs,
> >
> > How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <mailto:
> harbs.lists@gmail.com>>:
> >
> >> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
> >> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
> >> <js:TextPromptBead>
> >>
> >> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
> >>
> >> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
> >>
> >> Harbs
> >>
> >>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You are right. I missed this.
> >>>
> >>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> >>>
> >>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
> >> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I think you missed one important point I
> >>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
> >>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without
> all
> >>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> >>>>
> >>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel
> will
> >> be
> >>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
> >> you
> >>>> can find it in the develop branch."
> >>>>
> >>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> >>>>
> >>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
> >> with
> >>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
> latest
> >> 2
> >>>> months. I think this is crucial.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <
> https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/
> piotrzarzycki>>*
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
VSCode using asconfigc
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Harbs,
>
> How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>:
>
>> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
>> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
>> <js:TextPromptBead>
>>
>> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
>>
>> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You are right. I missed this.
>>>
>>> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>>>
>>>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
>> <mailto:carlosrovira@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think you missed one important point I
>>>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
>>>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
>>>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
>>>>
>>>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will
>> be
>>>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
>> you
>>>> can find it in the develop branch."
>>>>
>>>> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
>>>>
>>>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
>> with
>>>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest
>> 2
>>>> months. I think this is crucial.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Harbs,
How did you build the examples? Using VSCode or script ant/maven ?
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-05-17 11:55 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog
> post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be
> <js:TextPromptBead>
>
> Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
>
> Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
>
> Harbs
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You are right. I missed this.
> >
> > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> >
> >> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think you missed one important point I
> >> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
> >> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
> >> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> >>
> >> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will
> be
> >> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
> you
> >> can find it in the develop branch."
> >>
> >> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> >>
> >> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
> with
> >> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest
> 2
> >> months. I think this is crucial.
> >
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
FWIW, it looks to me like the only thing that will not work in the blog post is <j:View> needs to be <js:View> and <j:TextPrompt> needs to be <js:TextPromptBead>
Although when I compile styles are definitely missing.
Yeah. Jewel is definitely missing important pieces… :-(
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You are right. I missed this.
>
> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>
>> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlosrovira@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I think you missed one important point I
>> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
>> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
>> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
>>
>> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will be
>> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile you
>> can find it in the develop branch."
>>
>> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
>>
>> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship with
>> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest 2
>> months. I think this is crucial.
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I don't care what version number we give it as long as it is <1. I'm more concerned about what commit hash we are going to use. I see a great discussion going on about package re-organization, however, that is probably not going to be ready to release soon.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 5/26/18, 6:23 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Om,
there's many changes since 0.9.2, so I was thinking the same as you. We
don't need to go to 0.9.4, we can skip to 0.9.5 or as you say, 0.10.0
thanks
2018-05-26 15:20 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
> I just remembered that we have already pushed a 0.9.3 release to npm. We
> will not be able to re release that version. Perhaps we just skip to 0.9.4
> version next?
>
> Or even 0.10.0?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2018, 12:17 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Alex,
> >
> > I committed as well some poms that needed change from 0.9.4 to 0.9.3
> > snapshot. We'll need to check why this ones are not update to the new
> > version when doing a prepare release.
> >
> > I'll try as well to summarize briefly the discussion about reorganization
> > so people could check easily the main points of what we are discussing,
> > hope that helps to take decisions and go forward
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-25 21:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from
> > all
> > > 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since
> the
> > > branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler
> and
> > > royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their
> > develop
> > > branches.
> > >
> > > I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in.
> > >
> > > AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to
> > what
> > > commit hash to release from for royale-asjs.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > The minimun change is to see package names change.
> > > Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have
> > > problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think
> > is
> > > not
> > > good, since is missing maven build), in
> > "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
> > > Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
> > >
> > > 2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > You are right. I missed this.
> > > >
> > > > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> > > >
> > > > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you missed one important point I
> > > > > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are
> > using
> > > the
> > > > > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3
> > > without all
> > > > > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we
> have:
> > > > >
> > > > > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes.
> > Jewel
> > > will
> > > > be
> > > > > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the
> > > meanwhile
> > > > you
> > > > > can find it in the develop branch."
> > > > >
> > > > > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> > > > >
> > > > > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it
> can
> > > ship
> > > > with
> > > > > all that we are promising in website and social networks for
> the
> > > latest 2
> > > > > months. I think this is crucial.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %
> > > 7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluG
> > > Uzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C480f4748e4c04bcb5c8408d5c30be8bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636629378271517790&sdata=31D%2FYlvqGMoMwP2rZOdLMaSzYklK1mjgwT6jWmXpWgg%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C480f4748e4c04bcb5c8408d5c30be8bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636629378271517790&sdata=31D%2FYlvqGMoMwP2rZOdLMaSzYklK1mjgwT6jWmXpWgg%3D&reserved=0
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Om,
there's many changes since 0.9.2, so I was thinking the same as you. We
don't need to go to 0.9.4, we can skip to 0.9.5 or as you say, 0.10.0
thanks
2018-05-26 15:20 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
> I just remembered that we have already pushed a 0.9.3 release to npm. We
> will not be able to re release that version. Perhaps we just skip to 0.9.4
> version next?
>
> Or even 0.10.0?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2018, 12:17 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Alex,
> >
> > I committed as well some poms that needed change from 0.9.4 to 0.9.3
> > snapshot. We'll need to check why this ones are not update to the new
> > version when doing a prepare release.
> >
> > I'll try as well to summarize briefly the discussion about reorganization
> > so people could check easily the main points of what we are discussing,
> > hope that helps to take decisions and go forward
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-25 21:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from
> > all
> > > 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since
> the
> > > branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler
> and
> > > royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their
> > develop
> > > branches.
> > >
> > > I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in.
> > >
> > > AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to
> > what
> > > commit hash to release from for royale-asjs.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > The minimun change is to see package names change.
> > > Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have
> > > problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think
> > is
> > > not
> > > good, since is missing maven build), in
> > "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
> > > Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
> > >
> > > 2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > You are right. I missed this.
> > > >
> > > > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> > > >
> > > > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think you missed one important point I
> > > > > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are
> > using
> > > the
> > > > > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3
> > > without all
> > > > > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we
> have:
> > > > >
> > > > > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes.
> > Jewel
> > > will
> > > > be
> > > > > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the
> > > meanwhile
> > > > you
> > > > > can find it in the develop branch."
> > > > >
> > > > > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> > > > >
> > > > > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it
> can
> > > ship
> > > > with
> > > > > all that we are promising in website and social networks for
> the
> > > latest 2
> > > > > months. I think this is crucial.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %
> > > 7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluG
> > > Uzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I just remembered that we have already pushed a 0.9.3 release to npm. We
will not be able to re release that version. Perhaps we just skip to 0.9.4
version next?
Or even 0.10.0?
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, May 26, 2018, 12:17 AM Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Thanks Alex,
>
> I committed as well some poms that needed change from 0.9.4 to 0.9.3
> snapshot. We'll need to check why this ones are not update to the new
> version when doing a prepare release.
>
> I'll try as well to summarize briefly the discussion about reorganization
> so people could check easily the main points of what we are discussing,
> hope that helps to take decisions and go forward
>
> Thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> 2018-05-25 21:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from
> all
> > 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since the
> > branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler and
> > royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their
> develop
> > branches.
> >
> > I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in.
> >
> > AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to
> what
> > commit hash to release from for royale-asjs.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> > Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > The minimun change is to see package names change.
> > Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have
> > problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think
> is
> > not
> > good, since is missing maven build), in
> "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
> > Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
> >
> > 2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > You are right. I missed this.
> > >
> > > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> > >
> > > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think you missed one important point I
> > > > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are
> using
> > the
> > > > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3
> > without all
> > > > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> > > >
> > > > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes.
> Jewel
> > will
> > > be
> > > > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the
> > meanwhile
> > > you
> > > > can find it in the develop branch."
> > > >
> > > > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> > > >
> > > > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can
> > ship
> > > with
> > > > all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
> > latest 2
> > > > months. I think this is crucial.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> > 7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluG
> > Uzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Thanks Alex,
I committed as well some poms that needed change from 0.9.4 to 0.9.3
snapshot. We'll need to check why this ones are not update to the new
version when doing a prepare release.
I'll try as well to summarize briefly the discussion about reorganization
so people could check easily the main points of what we are discussing,
hope that helps to take decisions and go forward
Thanks
Carlos
2018-05-25 21:37 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from all
> 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since the
> branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler and
> royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their develop
> branches.
>
> I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in.
>
> AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to what
> commit hash to release from for royale-asjs.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos
> Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> The minimun change is to see package names change.
> Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have
> problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think is
> not
> good, since is missing maven build), in "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
> Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
>
> 2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
> > You are right. I missed this.
> >
> > What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> >
> > > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I think you missed one important point I
> > > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using
> the
> > > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3
> without all
> > > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> > >
> > > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel
> will
> > be
> > > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the
> meanwhile
> > you
> > > can find it in the develop branch."
> > >
> > > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> > >
> > > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can
> ship
> > with
> > > all that we are promising in website and social networks for the
> latest 2
> > > months. I think this is crucial.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluG
> Uzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
In case folks are wondering, I deleted the release/0.9.3 branches from all 3 repos. There have been changes made in each of the branches since the branches were cut and there were also issues with the royale-compiler and royale-typedefs branches not having synced version numbers to their develop branches.
I see a vote thread opened today on Maven's lists for the SCM plug in.
AIUI, we are on hold for a release unless we get general consensus to what commit hash to release from for royale-asjs.
-Alex
On 5/17/18, 3:02 AM, "carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rovira@gmail.com on behalf of carlosrovira@apache.org> wrote:
The minimun change is to see package names change.
Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have
problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think is not
good, since is missing maven build), in "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> You are right. I missed this.
>
> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think you missed one important point I
> > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
> > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
> > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> >
> > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will
> be
> > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
> you
> > can find it in the develop branch."
> >
> > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> >
> > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
> with
> > all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest 2
> > months. I think this is crucial.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C9a61c338f4554b04aa9008d5bbdd5762%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621481721528268&sdata=6FoSfupJoaFpfsqJcJ7HtHNpRoQluGUzh6hlM21AH20%3D&reserved=0
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
The minimun change is to see package names change.
Take into account that all is building and working ok. Only we have
problems in jsonly build since is only depends on ANT (what I think is not
good, since is missing maven build), in "/mustella/tests/basicTests/".
Looking at what's happening in that part will solve the build.
2018-05-17 11:40 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> You are right. I missed this.
>
> What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > I think you missed one important point I
> > posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
> > actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
> > that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
> >
> > "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will
> be
> > available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile
> you
> > can find it in the develop branch."
> >
> > and the code is tailored with the actual api.
> >
> > For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship
> with
> > all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest 2
> > months. I think this is crucial.
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
You are right. I missed this.
What is the minimum change necessary to get this to work?
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:24 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I think you missed one important point I
> posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
> actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
> that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
>
> "The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will be
> available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile you
> can find it in the develop branch."
>
> and the code is tailored with the actual api.
>
> For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship with
> all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest 2
> months. I think this is crucial.
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
2018-05-17 11:16 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> Definitely a plan.
>
Good! :)
>
> My guess is that if we agree on changing package paths, there will likely
> be other classes that should be considered.
>
For sure I think a 1.0 version should not have "core" packages in "Basic"
SWC nor "html" packages in "Core" SWC. I'm pretty sure there's more other
cases that we need to structure, reorganize and clean.
> My preference would be to have this discussion after we finish the project
> refactor discussion because I think it’s going to be related to the outcome
> of that.
>
For me we can do that in parallel but if the rest think the same for me is
ok.
>
> Either way, I don’t think discussion should hold up the 0.9.3 release.
> We’re already past due for a release. We want to “release early and release
> often”… ;-)
>
>
As Piotr, I don't agree with this. I think you missed one important point I
posted in other email: All blog post samples posted that are using the
actual names, packages and namespaces. If you release 0.9.3 without all
that, we can destroy out credibility since in all posts we have:
"The example uses the new Jewel UI set that supports themes. Jewel will be
available in the forthcoming 0.9.3 release of Royale. In the meanwhile you
can find it in the develop branch."
and the code is tailored with the actual api.
For that reason, I think is important to hold 0.9.3 until it can ship with
all that we are promising in website and social networks for the latest 2
months. I think this is crucial.
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 12:07 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok,
> >
> > what if:
> >
> > * I take the time to generate a list of classes with package name changes
> > * Make a thread with the list to expose it
> > * Let's see from there if people can live with it (We'll call people to
> > express about this changes and could see if are or not dramatic to them)
> >
> > Sounds this like a plan?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Sure. Same here.
> >>
> >> But things are much more stable now. As we move closer to “1.0”, I think
> >> we should be more careful about breaking changes and documenting them
> when
> >> we decide they are necessary.
> >>
> >> As far as these specific changes go: We haven’t even come to a
> conclusion
> >> on what (if any) package names should change yet, and including those
> >> changes in a release is premature. If we do change package names, I’m of
> >> the opinion that they should be decided on and all happen at once to
> >> minimize impact on end-users.
> >>
> >> Does that help clarify things?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Harbs
> >>
> >>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>> We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While
> >> we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept
> to
> >> an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if
> we
> >> do.
> >>>
> >>> There has been many previous breaking changes that broke the
> application
> >> I was working on and some more major than this and cost me a lot of
> time to
> >> fix. Until you make it version 1.0 I think people will expect that some
> >> things may break with a new version. So why should this be an exception
> to
> >> what has happened before? Saying that however, what would be good to
> see is
> >> to provide guidance to what users need to change so their app works with
> >> any changes / backward compatibility issues.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Justin
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Definitely a plan.
My guess is that if we agree on changing package paths, there will likely be other classes that should be considered.
My preference would be to have this discussion after we finish the project refactor discussion because I think it’s going to be related to the outcome of that.
Either way, I don’t think discussion should hold up the 0.9.3 release. We’re already past due for a release. We want to “release early and release often”… ;-)
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 12:07 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Ok,
>
> what if:
>
> * I take the time to generate a list of classes with package name changes
> * Make a thread with the list to expose it
> * Let's see from there if people can live with it (We'll call people to
> express about this changes and could see if are or not dramatic to them)
>
> Sounds this like a plan?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> 2018-05-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Sure. Same here.
>>
>> But things are much more stable now. As we move closer to “1.0”, I think
>> we should be more careful about breaking changes and documenting them when
>> we decide they are necessary.
>>
>> As far as these specific changes go: We haven’t even come to a conclusion
>> on what (if any) package names should change yet, and including those
>> changes in a release is premature. If we do change package names, I’m of
>> the opinion that they should be decided on and all happen at once to
>> minimize impact on end-users.
>>
>> Does that help clarify things?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While
>> we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept to
>> an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if we
>> do.
>>>
>>> There has been many previous breaking changes that broke the application
>> I was working on and some more major than this and cost me a lot of time to
>> fix. Until you make it version 1.0 I think people will expect that some
>> things may break with a new version. So why should this be an exception to
>> what has happened before? Saying that however, what would be good to see is
>> to provide guidance to what users need to change so their app works with
>> any changes / backward compatibility issues.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
I think better focus on discussion and have proper solution. Than make the
release.
2018-05-17 11:07 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Ok,
>
> what if:
>
> * I take the time to generate a list of classes with package name changes
> * Make a thread with the list to expose it
> * Let's see from there if people can live with it (We'll call people to
> express about this changes and could see if are or not dramatic to them)
>
> Sounds this like a plan?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> 2018-05-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Sure. Same here.
> >
> > But things are much more stable now. As we move closer to “1.0”, I think
> > we should be more careful about breaking changes and documenting them
> when
> > we decide they are necessary.
> >
> > As far as these specific changes go: We haven’t even come to a conclusion
> > on what (if any) package names should change yet, and including those
> > changes in a release is premature. If we do change package names, I’m of
> > the opinion that they should be decided on and all happen at once to
> > minimize impact on end-users.
> >
> > Does that help clarify things?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On May 17, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >> We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While
> > we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept
> to
> > an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if we
> > do.
> > >
> > > There has been many previous breaking changes that broke the
> application
> > I was working on and some more major than this and cost me a lot of time
> to
> > fix. Until you make it version 1.0 I think people will expect that some
> > things may break with a new version. So why should this be an exception
> to
> > what has happened before? Saying that however, what would be good to see
> is
> > to provide guidance to what users need to change so their app works with
> > any changes / backward compatibility issues.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Ok,
what if:
* I take the time to generate a list of classes with package name changes
* Make a thread with the list to expose it
* Let's see from there if people can live with it (We'll call people to
express about this changes and could see if are or not dramatic to them)
Sounds this like a plan?
Thanks
2018-05-17 10:58 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> Sure. Same here.
>
> But things are much more stable now. As we move closer to “1.0”, I think
> we should be more careful about breaking changes and documenting them when
> we decide they are necessary.
>
> As far as these specific changes go: We haven’t even come to a conclusion
> on what (if any) package names should change yet, and including those
> changes in a release is premature. If we do change package names, I’m of
> the opinion that they should be decided on and all happen at once to
> minimize impact on end-users.
>
> Does that help clarify things?
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While
> we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept to
> an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if we
> do.
> >
> > There has been many previous breaking changes that broke the application
> I was working on and some more major than this and cost me a lot of time to
> fix. Until you make it version 1.0 I think people will expect that some
> things may break with a new version. So why should this be an exception to
> what has happened before? Saying that however, what would be good to see is
> to provide guidance to what users need to change so their app works with
> any changes / backward compatibility issues.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Sure. Same here.
But things are much more stable now. As we move closer to “1.0”, I think we should be more careful about breaking changes and documenting them when we decide they are necessary.
As far as these specific changes go: We haven’t even come to a conclusion on what (if any) package names should change yet, and including those changes in a release is premature. If we do change package names, I’m of the opinion that they should be decided on and all happen at once to minimize impact on end-users.
Does that help clarify things?
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept to an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if we do.
>
> There has been many previous breaking changes that broke the application I was working on and some more major than this and cost me a lot of time to fix. Until you make it version 1.0 I think people will expect that some things may break with a new version. So why should this be an exception to what has happened before? Saying that however, what would be good to see is to provide guidance to what users need to change so their app works with any changes / backward compatibility issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept to an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if we do.
There has been many previous breaking changes that broke the application I was working on and some more major than this and cost me a lot of time to fix. Until you make it version 1.0 I think people will expect that some things may break with a new version. So why should this be an exception to what has happened before? Saying that however, what would be good to see is to provide guidance to what users need to change so their app works with any changes / backward compatibility issues.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
> I only what to said at this regard, that I expect, as we have alll things
> working and think about release 1.0, that before that release, is very
> normal to change packages and names right?
No. I disagree with this.
We are at the point where people are using Royale in production. While we can make breaking changes if they are warranted, they should be kept to an absolute minimum and be carefully considered and well documented if we do.
My $0.02,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> ok, as I said, package names are not something crucial. It's only something
> we can put back to their old names.
> I only what to said at this regard, that I expect, as we have alll things
> working and think about release 1.0, that before that release, is very
> normal to change packages and names right? (maybe our most near examples
> where Flex releases from beta codenames to final i.e: Jumbo to Flex 4.0,
> many changes where done by Adobe that broke existing applications, but that
> was nothing people will think was bad, since they prefer a better names and
> organization for the major release and to follow in the future)
>
> If you finally, with all that said, want me to change packages to all way,
> I can do that. As I stated, this is not crucial, only library place is
> (Basic to Core).
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> 2018-05-17 10:10 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Carlos,
>>
>> The problem is that any existing applications which subclass or import
>> DataGroup (for example) will break by upgrading to 0.9.3. We don’t want
>> release breaking changes unless we decide that breaking changes are
>> necessary.
>>
>> We are still discussing that whole topic and this release will likely
>> happen before that discussion is finished.
>>
>> IMO, it’s better to release less features than release breaking changes
>> which might be reverted.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>
>>> that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
>>> refactor:
>>>
>>> import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>>>
>>> public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>>>
>>> Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
>>> examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>>>
>>> I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
>> that.
>>>
>>> The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>>>
>>> search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
>>> replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>>>
>>> (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
>>> Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
>>> UI sets)
>>>
>>> I'll be looking at it right now
>>>
>>> Thanks for exposing it! :)
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
>> instead...
>>>>
>>>> It looks like it does have issues.
>>>>
>>>> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>>>>
>>>> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>>>> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>>>>
>>>> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>>>> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>>>>
>>>> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>>>> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>>>>
>>>> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>>>>
>>>> Harbs
>>>>
>>>>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
>>>> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
>> their
>>>> history on GitHub.
>>>>>
>>>>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
>>>> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
>>>> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Harbs,
ok, as I said, package names are not something crucial. It's only something
we can put back to their old names.
I only what to said at this regard, that I expect, as we have alll things
working and think about release 1.0, that before that release, is very
normal to change packages and names right? (maybe our most near examples
where Flex releases from beta codenames to final i.e: Jumbo to Flex 4.0,
many changes where done by Adobe that broke existing applications, but that
was nothing people will think was bad, since they prefer a better names and
organization for the major release and to follow in the future)
If you finally, with all that said, want me to change packages to all way,
I can do that. As I stated, this is not crucial, only library place is
(Basic to Core).
thanks
2018-05-17 10:10 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> The problem is that any existing applications which subclass or import
> DataGroup (for example) will break by upgrading to 0.9.3. We don’t want
> release breaking changes unless we decide that breaking changes are
> necessary.
>
> We are still discussing that whole topic and this release will likely
> happen before that discussion is finished.
>
> IMO, it’s better to release less features than release breaking changes
> which might be reverted.
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
> > On May 17, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> > that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
> > refactor:
> >
> > import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
> >
> > public class NodeElementBase extends Group
> >
> > Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> > examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
> >
> > I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
> that.
> >
> > The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
> >
> > search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
> > replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
> >
> > (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
> > Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
> > UI sets)
> >
> > I'll be looking at it right now
> >
> > Thanks for exposing it! :)
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
> instead...
> >>
> >> It looks like it does have issues.
> >>
> >> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
> >>
> >> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> >> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
> >>
> >> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> >> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
> >>
> >> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> >> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
> >>
> >> Everything below “ul" is missing.
> >>
> >> Harbs
> >>
> >>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> >> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
> >> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
> their
> >> history on GitHub.
> >>>
> >>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
> >> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
> >> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
It might be that we decide that DataGroup does belong in Core with a “core” package path, but I don’t even think there’s a list of classes which were changed. Maybe there are too many. Maybe there are others which should be changed. Maybe we’ll decide that it’s not worth it to change any. I don’t know.
Changing package paths is not something we should do lightly, and if we do make changes, it should only happen in a single release and all changes should be carefully considered. There has not been nearly enough discussion on that yet.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:10 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> The problem is that any existing applications which subclass or import DataGroup (for example) will break by upgrading to 0.9.3. We don’t want release breaking changes unless we decide that breaking changes are necessary.
>
> We are still discussing that whole topic and this release will likely happen before that discussion is finished.
>
> IMO, it’s better to release less features than release breaking changes which might be reverted.
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
>> On May 17, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Harbs,
>>
>> that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
>> refactor:
>>
>> import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>>
>> public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>>
>> Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
>> examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>>
>> I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for that.
>>
>> The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>>
>> search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
>> replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>>
>> (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
>> Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
>> UI sets)
>>
>> I'll be looking at it right now
>>
>> Thanks for exposing it! :)
>>
>> Carlos
>>
>>
>>
>> 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
>>>
>>> It looks like it does have issues.
>>>
>>> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>>>
>>> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>>> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>>>
>>> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>>> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>>>
>>> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>>> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>>>
>>> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>>>
>>> Harbs
>>>
>>>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>>> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
>>> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
>>> history on GitHub.
>>>>
>>>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
>>> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
>>> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Hi Carlos,
The problem is that any existing applications which subclass or import DataGroup (for example) will break by upgrading to 0.9.3. We don’t want release breaking changes unless we decide that breaking changes are necessary.
We are still discussing that whole topic and this release will likely happen before that discussion is finished.
IMO, it’s better to release less features than release breaking changes which might be reverted.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Harbs,
>
> that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
> refactor:
>
> import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>
> public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>
> Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>
> I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for that.
>
> The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>
> search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
> replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>
> (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
> Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
> UI sets)
>
> I'll be looking at it right now
>
> Thanks for exposing it! :)
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
>>
>> It looks like it does have issues.
>>
>> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>>
>> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>>
>> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>>
>> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>>
>> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
>> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
>> history on GitHub.
>>>
>>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
>> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
>> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
for me that's ok Piotr too
thanks
2018-05-17 10:30 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> Carlos,
>
> Those changes were not properly discussed. Let's wait till the end of the
> discussion and proper fix. I personally prefer wait even another month than
> release something what can change significantly.
>
> Is that make sense to others ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-05-17 10:26 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > just find the imports with problems, fix them and committed. If there's
> no
> > others this should fix the release.
> >
> > If you see the commit, the changes are easy, and no more of some secs to
> do
> > for our users, in case they use this core classes.
> >
> > Let's see what Jenkins reports in the following build
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-17 10:16 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > I think we are getting sufficient progress I the discussion thread to
> > > still think about a revert. I'm most for change things from this point,
> > > that should be the normal way from 0.9.2 to 1.0. We can as well hold a
> > bit
> > > the release until we have cleared all this. As I said, if we revert,
> and
> > > release 0.9.3 with old code, blog examples will not work at all, and
> that
> > > will suppose lots of people in the internet trying us and failing.
> > >
> > > Think that:
> > >
> > > 1) There's no breaking changes at all about functionality
> > > 2) The change was only:
> > > a) move things from Basic to Core
> > > b) rename packages on some of that 2.a) things
> > >
> > >
> > > So the real problem now for me is 2.b) and that's the reason why jsonly
> > > build is failing, since we have things in framework with not examples
> > > referencing it, and since SWCs does not validate CSS beads, when used
> > that
> > > CSS in final app that fails. I think that's for me a major problem, and
> > > will prefer to focus in find that code and fixing it.
> > >
> > > I'm trying to focus this morning on doing this, and hope to fix on that
> > > way jsonly
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-05-17 10:08 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >> It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the
> result
> > >> of
> > >> the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and
> > solution
> > >> will be completely different. What will be the experience of the
> created
> > >> app on the user sight ?
> > >>
> > >> 2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Harbs,
> > >> >
> > >> > that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than
> > before
> > >> > refactor:
> > >> >
> > >> > import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
> > >> >
> > >> > public class NodeElementBase extends Group
> > >> >
> > >> > Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> > >> > examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
> > >> >
> > >> > I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
> > >> that.
> > >> >
> > >> > The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and
> direct:
> > >> >
> > >> > search all "import org.apache.royale.html.
> supportClasses.DataGroup;"
> > >> and
> > >> > replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
> > >> >
> > >> > (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used
> not
> > >> as
> > >> > Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the
> rest
> > >> of
> > >> > UI sets)
> > >> >
> > >> > I'll be looking at it right now
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for exposing it! :)
> > >> >
> > >> > Carlos
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
> > >> > instead...
> > >> > >
> > >> > > It looks like it does have issues.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> > >> > > https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to
> missing
> > >> > > components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> > >> > > https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Everything below “ul" is missing.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Harbs
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> > >> > > <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in
> > >> question.
> > >> > > You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look
> at
> > >> > their
> > >> > > history on GitHub.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released?
> The
> > >> only
> > >> > > response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from
> > >> sources.
> > >> > > If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > -Alex
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Carlos Rovira
> > >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>
> > >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Yes. It definitely makes sense to me.
Let’s get the 0.9.3 release out without breaking changes. If we decide to keep Carlos’ changes and/or modify them, there’s no reason it cannot go into 0.9.4.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 11:30 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Carlos,
>
> Those changes were not properly discussed. Let's wait till the end of the
> discussion and proper fix. I personally prefer wait even another month than
> release something what can change significantly.
>
> Is that make sense to others ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2018-05-17 10:26 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just find the imports with problems, fix them and committed. If there's no
>> others this should fix the release.
>>
>> If you see the commit, the changes are easy, and no more of some secs to do
>> for our users, in case they use this core classes.
>>
>> Let's see what Jenkins reports in the following build
>>
>>
>> 2018-05-17 10:16 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>
>>> I think we are getting sufficient progress I the discussion thread to
>>> still think about a revert. I'm most for change things from this point,
>>> that should be the normal way from 0.9.2 to 1.0. We can as well hold a
>> bit
>>> the release until we have cleared all this. As I said, if we revert, and
>>> release 0.9.3 with old code, blog examples will not work at all, and that
>>> will suppose lots of people in the internet trying us and failing.
>>>
>>> Think that:
>>>
>>> 1) There's no breaking changes at all about functionality
>>> 2) The change was only:
>>> a) move things from Basic to Core
>>> b) rename packages on some of that 2.a) things
>>>
>>>
>>> So the real problem now for me is 2.b) and that's the reason why jsonly
>>> build is failing, since we have things in framework with not examples
>>> referencing it, and since SWCs does not validate CSS beads, when used
>> that
>>> CSS in final app that fails. I think that's for me a major problem, and
>>> will prefer to focus in find that code and fixing it.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to focus this morning on doing this, and hope to fix on that
>>> way jsonly
>>>
>>>
>>> 2018-05-17 10:08 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the result
>>>> of
>>>> the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and
>> solution
>>>> will be completely different. What will be the experience of the created
>>>> app on the user sight ?
>>>>
>>>> 2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Harbs,
>>>>>
>>>>> that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than
>> before
>>>>> refactor:
>>>>>
>>>>> import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>>>>>
>>>>> public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
>>>>> examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
>>>> that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>>>>>
>>>>> search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;"
>>>> and
>>>>> replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>>>>>
>>>>> (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not
>>>> as
>>>>> Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest
>>>> of
>>>>> UI sets)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll be looking at it right now
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for exposing it! :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
>>>>> instead...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks like it does have issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>>>>>> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>>>>>> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>>>>>> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Harbs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>>>>>> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in
>>>> question.
>>>>>> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
>>>>> their
>>>>>> history on GitHub.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The
>>>> only
>>>>>> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from
>>>> sources.
>>>>>> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carlos Rovira
>>>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>
>>>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Carlos,
Those changes were not properly discussed. Let's wait till the end of the
discussion and proper fix. I personally prefer wait even another month than
release something what can change significantly.
Is that make sense to others ?
Thanks, Piotr
2018-05-17 10:26 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> just find the imports with problems, fix them and committed. If there's no
> others this should fix the release.
>
> If you see the commit, the changes are easy, and no more of some secs to do
> for our users, in case they use this core classes.
>
> Let's see what Jenkins reports in the following build
>
>
> 2018-05-17 10:16 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > I think we are getting sufficient progress I the discussion thread to
> > still think about a revert. I'm most for change things from this point,
> > that should be the normal way from 0.9.2 to 1.0. We can as well hold a
> bit
> > the release until we have cleared all this. As I said, if we revert, and
> > release 0.9.3 with old code, blog examples will not work at all, and that
> > will suppose lots of people in the internet trying us and failing.
> >
> > Think that:
> >
> > 1) There's no breaking changes at all about functionality
> > 2) The change was only:
> > a) move things from Basic to Core
> > b) rename packages on some of that 2.a) things
> >
> >
> > So the real problem now for me is 2.b) and that's the reason why jsonly
> > build is failing, since we have things in framework with not examples
> > referencing it, and since SWCs does not validate CSS beads, when used
> that
> > CSS in final app that fails. I think that's for me a major problem, and
> > will prefer to focus in find that code and fixing it.
> >
> > I'm trying to focus this morning on doing this, and hope to fix on that
> > way jsonly
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-17 10:08 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the result
> >> of
> >> the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and
> solution
> >> will be completely different. What will be the experience of the created
> >> app on the user sight ?
> >>
> >> 2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >> > Hi Harbs,
> >> >
> >> > that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than
> before
> >> > refactor:
> >> >
> >> > import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
> >> >
> >> > public class NodeElementBase extends Group
> >> >
> >> > Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> >> > examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
> >> >
> >> > I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
> >> that.
> >> >
> >> > The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
> >> >
> >> > search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;"
> >> and
> >> > replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
> >> >
> >> > (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not
> >> as
> >> > Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest
> >> of
> >> > UI sets)
> >> >
> >> > I'll be looking at it right now
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for exposing it! :)
> >> >
> >> > Carlos
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
> >> > instead...
> >> > >
> >> > > It looks like it does have issues.
> >> > >
> >> > > I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
> >> > >
> >> > > I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> >> > > https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
> >> > >
> >> > > I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> >> > > components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
> >> > >
> >> > > Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> >> > > https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
> >> > >
> >> > > Everything below “ul" is missing.
> >> > >
> >> > > Harbs
> >> > >
> >> > > > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> >> > > <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in
> >> question.
> >> > > You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
> >> > their
> >> > > history on GitHub.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The
> >> only
> >> > > response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from
> >> sources.
> >> > > If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > -Alex
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Carlos Rovira
> >> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi,
just find the imports with problems, fix them and committed. If there's no
others this should fix the release.
If you see the commit, the changes are easy, and no more of some secs to do
for our users, in case they use this core classes.
Let's see what Jenkins reports in the following build
2018-05-17 10:16 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> I think we are getting sufficient progress I the discussion thread to
> still think about a revert. I'm most for change things from this point,
> that should be the normal way from 0.9.2 to 1.0. We can as well hold a bit
> the release until we have cleared all this. As I said, if we revert, and
> release 0.9.3 with old code, blog examples will not work at all, and that
> will suppose lots of people in the internet trying us and failing.
>
> Think that:
>
> 1) There's no breaking changes at all about functionality
> 2) The change was only:
> a) move things from Basic to Core
> b) rename packages on some of that 2.a) things
>
>
> So the real problem now for me is 2.b) and that's the reason why jsonly
> build is failing, since we have things in framework with not examples
> referencing it, and since SWCs does not validate CSS beads, when used that
> CSS in final app that fails. I think that's for me a major problem, and
> will prefer to focus in find that code and fixing it.
>
> I'm trying to focus this morning on doing this, and hope to fix on that
> way jsonly
>
>
> 2018-05-17 10:08 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
>
>> It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the result
>> of
>> the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and solution
>> will be completely different. What will be the experience of the created
>> app on the user sight ?
>>
>> 2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>>
>> > Hi Harbs,
>> >
>> > that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
>> > refactor:
>> >
>> > import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>> >
>> > public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>> >
>> > Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
>> > examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>> >
>> > I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
>> that.
>> >
>> > The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>> >
>> > search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;"
>> and
>> > replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>> >
>> > (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not
>> as
>> > Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest
>> of
>> > UI sets)
>> >
>> > I'll be looking at it right now
>> >
>> > Thanks for exposing it! :)
>> >
>> > Carlos
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > > Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
>> > instead...
>> > >
>> > > It looks like it does have issues.
>> > >
>> > > I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>> > >
>> > > I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>> > > https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>> > >
>> > > I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>> > > components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>> > >
>> > > Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>> > > https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>> > >
>> > > Everything below “ul" is missing.
>> > >
>> > > Harbs
>> > >
>> > > > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>> > > <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in
>> question.
>> > > You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
>> > their
>> > > history on GitHub.
>> > > >
>> > > > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The
>> only
>> > > response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from
>> sources.
>> > > If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>> > > >
>> > > > -Alex
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Rovira
>> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Piotr,
I think we are getting sufficient progress I the discussion thread to still
think about a revert. I'm most for change things from this point, that
should be the normal way from 0.9.2 to 1.0. We can as well hold a bit the
release until we have cleared all this. As I said, if we revert, and
release 0.9.3 with old code, blog examples will not work at all, and that
will suppose lots of people in the internet trying us and failing.
Think that:
1) There's no breaking changes at all about functionality
2) The change was only:
a) move things from Basic to Core
b) rename packages on some of that 2.a) things
So the real problem now for me is 2.b) and that's the reason why jsonly
build is failing, since we have things in framework with not examples
referencing it, and since SWCs does not validate CSS beads, when used that
CSS in final app that fails. I think that's for me a major problem, and
will prefer to focus in find that code and fixing it.
I'm trying to focus this morning on doing this, and hope to fix on that way
jsonly
2018-05-17 10:08 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>:
> It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the result of
> the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and solution
> will be completely different. What will be the experience of the created
> app on the user sight ?
>
> 2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> > that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
> > refactor:
> >
> > import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
> >
> > public class NodeElementBase extends Group
> >
> > Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> > examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
> >
> > I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for
> that.
> >
> > The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
> >
> > search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
> > replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
> >
> > (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
> > Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
> > UI sets)
> >
> > I'll be looking at it right now
> >
> > Thanks for exposing it! :)
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
> > instead...
> > >
> > > It looks like it does have issues.
> > >
> > > I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
> > >
> > > I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> > > https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
> > >
> > > I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> > > components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
> > >
> > > Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> > > https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
> > >
> > > Everything below “ul" is missing.
> > >
> > > Harbs
> > >
> > > > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> > > <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
> > > You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
> > their
> > > history on GitHub.
> > > >
> > > > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The
> only
> > > response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from
> sources.
> > > If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
It's not about the minor changes in his app in my opinion. In the result of
the discussion it may end up that you will revert everything and solution
will be completely different. What will be the experience of the created
app on the user sight ?
2018-05-17 10:05 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Harbs,
>
> that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
> refactor:
>
> import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
>
> public class NodeElementBase extends Group
>
> Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
> examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
>
> I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for that.
>
> The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
>
> search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
> replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
>
> (for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
> Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
> UI sets)
>
> I'll be looking at it right now
>
> Thanks for exposing it! :)
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> 2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link
> instead...
> >
> > It looks like it does have issues.
> >
> > I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
> >
> > I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> > https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
> >
> > I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> > components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
> >
> > Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> > https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
> >
> > Everything below “ul" is missing.
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> > <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
> > You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at
> their
> > history on GitHub.
> > >
> > > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
> > response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
> > If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Harbs,
that was returned to the old way, actually we have the same than before
refactor:
import org.apache.royale.html.Group;
public class NodeElementBase extends Group
Maybe the problem is that we don't have any example of ButtonBar in
examples? and thus I was not aware of that concrete component?
I'll try to see that and if we need, I'll create and example now for that.
The change to solve this in your code base is really easy and direct:
search all "import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;" and
replace with "import org.apache.royale.core.DataGroup;"
(for me is clear that DataGroup is a Core piece, that will be used not as
Basic or Jewel implementation, but as a "core" piece used for the rest of
UI sets)
I'll be looking at it right now
Thanks for exposing it! :)
Carlos
2018-05-17 8:49 GMT+02:00 Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>:
> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
>
> It looks like it does have issues.
>
> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>
> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>
> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>
> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>
> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
> history on GitHub.
> >
> > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I believe it’s 88cffe995de541584024cbf38eb016acfc677f98.
There are some later commits that we might want to apply to the 0.9.3 branch, but that shouldn’t be a big deal.
If it’s easier, you can also branch off feature/revert-refactor. That takes 88cffe9 and has a few commits applied to it.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Bummer. I checked the logs and you are correct. I thought I'd made the branches before those changes.
>
> I will probably see if the Maven release plugin will let me create branches from a particular Git commit. I'll look into it next week. Do you have a particular commit hash we should use?
>
> -Alex
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Bummer. I checked the logs and you are correct. I thought I'd made the branches before those changes.
I will probably see if the Maven release plugin will let me create branches from a particular Git commit. I'll look into it next week. Do you have a particular commit hash we should use?
-Alex
On 5/17/18, 12:23 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Is there a list of classes which had their package paths changed? At the very least, those should be changed back. Preferably returned to their original projects.
HTML can probably simply be reverted.
I’m not sure what else (if anything) needs to be fixed.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I do mean let's have it radical changes, but not partially as it is now. It
> looks like discussion may bring us some solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018, 8:50 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
>>
>> It looks like it does have issues.
>>
>> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>>
>> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FWy9t&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3a9617c0c3de46b2715808d5bbc70133%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621385820992291&sdata=5KxFscGAAorqRKVsibEBxkvka8lB1LkYQ3MebmIGbUo%3D&reserved=0 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2FWy9t&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3a9617c0c3de46b2715808d5bbc70133%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621385820992291&sdata=5KxFscGAAorqRKVsibEBxkvka8lB1LkYQ3MebmIGbUo%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>>
>> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fs9og&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3a9617c0c3de46b2715808d5bbc70133%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621385820992291&sdata=ONL1N8%2FSWy2ZLxH0xUcHrXMHOIR5EKYN3LmvCAyG%2F3c%3D&reserved=0 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apache.org%2Fs9og&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C3a9617c0c3de46b2715808d5bbc70133%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636621385820992291&sdata=ONL1N8%2FSWy2ZLxH0xUcHrXMHOIR5EKYN3LmvCAyG%2F3c%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
>> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
>> history on GitHub.
>>>
>>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
>> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
>> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Is there a list of classes which had their package paths changed? At the very least, those should be changed back. Preferably returned to their original projects.
HTML can probably simply be reverted.
I’m not sure what else (if anything) needs to be fixed.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 17, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I do mean let's have it radical changes, but not partially as it is now. It
> looks like discussion may bring us some solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018, 8:50 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
>>
>> It looks like it does have issues.
>>
>> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>>
>> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
>> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>>
>> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
>> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>>
>> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
>> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>>
>> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
>> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
>> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
>> history on GitHub.
>>>
>>> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
>> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
>> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>
>>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
I do mean let's have it radical changes, but not partially as it is now. It
looks like discussion may bring us some solution.
Thanks,
Piotr
On Thu, May 17, 2018, 8:50 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
>
> It looks like it does have issues.
>
> I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
>
> I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
> https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
>
> I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing
> components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
>
> Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
> https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
>
> Everything below “ul" is missing.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question.
> You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
> history on GitHub.
> >
> > Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Having trouble getting this email to “take”. Trying a paste link instead...
It looks like it does have issues.
I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t <https://paste.apache.org/Wy9t>
I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
https://paste.apache.org/s9og <https://paste.apache.org/s9og>
Everything below “ul" is missing.
Harbs
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question. You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their history on GitHub.
>
> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources. If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>
> -Alex
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Guys,
We definitely cannot have in release breaking changes. We may have another
customer.
I would like to avoid impression for him where in 0.9.3 we have some
changes in the next release there is radical another direction.
It would be great if we could merge at least compiler if there were some
positive changes there to release branch.
I really would be happy to have that fix [1], however if it's not an option
that's ok.
[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/222
Thanks,
Piotr
On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:45 PM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question. You
> can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their
> history on GitHub.
>
> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only
> response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources.
> If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/16/18, 11:46 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right now I’m pretty sure we have classes with changed package names.
> That will break existing applications.
>
> I doubt we’re going to be finished with the “refactor” discussion
> before we get the 0.9.3 release out. I’d like to be sure that no package
> names are changed in this release. I don’t really care how we do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
>
> > On May 16, 2018, at 7:54 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes
> currently
> >> in develop?
> >
> >
> > The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release
> > branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick.
> >
> > What is the status of develop? Are there any tickets we can keep
> track of?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> >
> >>> On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on
> Windows
> >>>> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used.
> It
> >> just
> >>>> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been
> >> cleaning
> >>>> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt
> >> because
> >>>> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git
> Add, but
> >>>> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long,
> not
> >> about
> >>>> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
> >>>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fmaven-scm%2Fpull%2F30&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=PxuJZQc8UOa2%2BQpmZY93SAsxnSn2Q6pK04%2BYi1kJK%2FE%3D&reserved=0.
> I’m tempted to wait until
> >>>> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring
> our
> >> build
> >>>> scripts to try to work around it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version
> of
> >>> maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
> >>>
> >>> If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you
> create
> >>> upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears
> that the
> >>> version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry `
> logs
> >>> during installation. That should hopefully fix:
> >>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fissues%2F231&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=VOKTeSnHdtVN2KmYI%2FvNfS7u%2BrgcnlcIJf%2BhhKyG3RE%3D&reserved=0
> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fissues%2F231&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=VOKTeSnHdtVN2KmYI%2FvNfS7u%2BrgcnlcIJf%2BhhKyG3RE%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of
> OmPrakash
> >>>> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
> >>>>
> >>>> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> >>>> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> >>>> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I was running this command:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1
> maven
> >>>> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent
> were
> >>>> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the
> risk to
> >>>> upgrade either.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the
> steps
> >>>> here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=WOPZRRAEr%2BBPchYRJS0187zmVvH0KMUB%2FLPieVq0Qes%3D&reserved=0
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=vR%2FZnJkAIYN1Y71pdoyM9v95B0I2f9rpdll%2BZ8kMC70%3D&reserved=0
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The last issue I faced was:
> >>>>
> >>>> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the
> >> filename
> >>>> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=oGN0WqU3P84JtxERNZpX1novXJKPhTY5Q0MGAy1rACc%3D&reserved=0
> >>>> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
> >>>> application-for-windows
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> But that did not work.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID
> <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Om,
> >>>>
> >>>> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was
> created on
> >>>> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like
> for
> >> the
> >>>> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
> >>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
> >>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
> >>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
> >>>> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Om,
> >>>>
> >>>> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more
> important
> >>>> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a
> release. I
> >> will
> >>>> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to
> where
> >>>> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming
> from.
> >>>>
> >>>> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert
> things
> >>>> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com>
> >>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf
> of
> >> OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> >>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:aharui@adobe.com
> ><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> ><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
> >>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I
> think
> >> i
> >>>> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any
> more
> >> than
> >>>> I already have.
> >>>> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release
> candidate
> >>>> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix
> that at
> >> this
> >>>> point.
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the
> trouble.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> >> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the
> wiki?
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fgithub.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=6sDxvKtfAPE35Iy6pBJ9EAVOE7LdfZ2%2B7DZf%2BuL%2BwRY%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> >>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=YH%2Fk68ubt9awy83JTyhQgAq3Zmc9PQrmW%2FSQt0PU8Cg%3D&reserved=0
> >%
> >>>> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
> >>>> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
> >>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <
> >> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
> >>>> 2Fgithub.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fgithub.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=6sDxvKtfAPE35Iy6pBJ9EAVOE7LdfZ2%2B7DZf%2BuL%2BwRY%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=YH%2Fk68ubt9awy83JTyhQgAq3Zmc9PQrmW%2FSQt0PU8Cg%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
> >>>> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check
> tomorrow.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com>
> >>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf
> of
> >> OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> >>>> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> ><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
> >>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>>> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:aharui@adobe.com
> ><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on
> the
> >>>> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash
> and
> >>>> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing
> >> something.
> >>>>
> >>>> <snip>
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> >>>> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this
> session
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested -
> can't
> >>>> get input
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> >>>> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit
> code:
> >> 2 ->
> >>>> [Help 1]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the
> errors,
> >>>> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to
> enable
> >>>> full debug logging.
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the
> errors and
> >>>> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0
> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=pFnkvvS6odCuw5ZseT3sVIXkAlz0HFURZ7DioNB8eDg%3D&reserved=0
> >.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprotection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fcwiki.apache.org%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=JO0yrP1ihdf4RMFELeSGN2GVWpbbTTNDDJrBF5ZR2O0%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>>
> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> >>>> /
> >>
> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >> <
> >>
> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >>>
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> >>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS:
> -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> >>>> [exec] [INFO]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> >>>> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> >>>> ........... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> >>>> ................ SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> >>>> ................... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> >>>> .................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> >>>> ............... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> >>>> .................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> >>>> .................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> >>>> ................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> >>>> .................... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> >>>> ................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
> >>>> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' ->
> [Help
> >> 1]
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> re-run
> >>>> Maven with the -e switch.
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
> full
> >>>> debug logging.
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> >> possible
> >>>> solutions, please read the following articles:
> >>>>
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1]
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0
> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=pFnkvvS6odCuw5ZseT3sVIXkAlz0HFURZ7DioNB8eDg%3D&reserved=0
> >.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprotection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fcwiki.apache.org%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=JO0yrP1ihdf4RMFELeSGN2GVWpbbTTNDDJrBF5ZR2O0%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>>
> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> >>>> /
> >>
> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >> <
> >>
> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >>>
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> >>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> >>>>
> >>>> BUILD FAILED
> >>>> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
> >>>> returned: 1
> >>>>
> >>>> Total time: 52 seconds
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> >> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Om,
> >>>>
> >>>> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t
> figure
> >>>> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing
> users@infra
> >>>> or going on hipchat to find out.
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fwww.apache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=O%2FoZrIZjvVhiIkXViKV9VposLGYkLT%2Bkw3UTSTc%2FRHU%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
> >>>> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
> >>>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww
> >.
> >>>> apache.org <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=IWcx%2Fdllpoa7eAYbUGnat2YpbyQlLlvKH93%2FcTPRhUc%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >%
> >>>> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
> >>>> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them.
> >> There
> >>>> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the
> parts
> >> that
> >>>> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of
> >> release
> >>>> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to
> >> delete
> >>>> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo
> working
> >> copy
> >>>> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That
> should pull
> >> a
> >>>> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to
> delete
> >>>> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain
> targets. I
> >> still
> >>>> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences
> between
> >>>> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There
> are a
> >> lot of
> >>>> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
> >>>>
> >>>> Good luck,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
> >>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> >>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:aharui@adobe.com
> ><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >>>> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
> >>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org
> ><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a
> few
> >>>> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix.
> Could
> >> those
> >>>> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> I am getting this error:
> >>>>
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> >>>> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you
> have
> >> local
> >>>> modifications :
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
> >>>>
> >>>> The pom.xml has only one change:
> >>>>
> >>>> <scm>
> >>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.
> >>>> git</connection>
> >>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
> >> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
> >>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> >>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> >>>> <tag>HEAD</tag>
> >>>> </scm>
> >>>>
> >>>> changed to:
> >>>>
> >>>> <scm>
> >>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.
> >>>> git</connection>
> >>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
> >> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
> >>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> >>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> >>>> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
> >>>> </scm>
> >>>>
> >>>> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
> >>>> release process?
> >>>> It does indeed have HEAD currently:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0
> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=pFnkvvS6odCuw5ZseT3sVIXkAlz0HFURZ7DioNB8eDg%3D&reserved=0
> >.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprotection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fgithub.com%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=oqYw5%2Fb3vPqaDzD5qkYkyTZPyJoraz48YohylL4VcAc%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>>> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
> >>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
> >>>>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
> >>>> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
> >>>> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
> >>>> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
> >>>> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui
> >> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We
> hope
> >> to
> >>>> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really
> matter
> >> whether
> >>>> something gets into the release or not. The next release should
> be a
> >> few
> >>>> weeks away.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, go for it!
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
> >>>> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com>>
> >>>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com
> ><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a
> new
> >>>> [Last Call]
> >>>> thread or is this it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
> >>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
> >>>> will be
> >>>>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
> >>>> we can
> >>>>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
> >>>> can follow
> >>>>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
> ><mailto:
> >> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Om,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fgithub.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=xMO13%2BYvzPuA1wv1d%2FLt60D98uQQbG1staQCDIL6q7Y%3D&reserved=0
> >>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> >>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2f40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=loJgvM4NY%2FJKkJjP6aacQNYEdLu7RXYJSyXZOuewS6E%3D&reserved=0
> >&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> >> 40adobe.com <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
> >%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
> >>>> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> >>>>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>>> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> >>>>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
> >>>> with VSCode.
> >>>>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> >>>> process?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
> >>>> Jewel theme
> >>>>>> integration in the meantime.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Om
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> >>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
> >>>> a bunch of
> >>>>> other
> >>>>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> >>>> again to
> >>>>> verify.
> >>>>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> >>>> release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> HTH,
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
> >>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> >>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> >>>>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
> >>>> don't want to
> >>>>> take
> >>>>>>> the time to
> >>>>>>>> find out.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Try this one:
> >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
> >>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> >>>>
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
> >>>> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> >>>>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> >>>>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> >>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>>>
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> >>>>> 5e31%
> >>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> >>>>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
> >>>> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
> >>>> builds both a
> >>>>>> js-swf
> >>>>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
> >>>> js-only
> >>>>> package.
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
> >>>> but uses a
> >>>>>> different
> >>>>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
> >>>> while.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will take a look at it now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0
> .
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>>
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> >>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> >>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> >>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>>>
> >>
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> >>>> <
> >>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>>
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> >>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserve
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Having trouble getting this email to “take”...
It looks like it does have issues.
I just pulled the 0.9.3 branch.
I get a lot of these warnings when I compile the framework:
[java] /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/DragDrop/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/ButtonBarReorderBead.as(43): col: 9 Warning: Definition org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataItemRenderer could not be found.
[java]
[java] import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataItemRenderer;
[java] ^
[java]
[java] /Apache/royale-asjs/frameworks/projects/DragDrop/src/main/royale/org/apache/royale/html/beads/DragDropListView.as(29): col: 9 Warning: Definition org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup could not be found.
[java]
[java] import org.apache.royale.html.supportClasses.DataGroup;
[java] ^
I used it to compile my app, and I get runtime errors due to missing components. This seems to be due to HTML not subclassing Group.
Here’s an example of elements which go AWAL:
<html:Ul className="tabs" id="tabList">
<html:Li>
<html:TextNode text="{locStr.TEXT}"/>
</html:Li>
<html:Li className="active">
<html:TextNode text="{locStr.FRAME}"/>
</html:Li>
</html:Ul>
Everything below <ul> is missing.
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:45 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>
> I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question. You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their history on GitHub.
>
> Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources. If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
>
> -Alex
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I'm pretty sure the branches were cut before the changes in question. You can pull down the branches and build them to verify. Or look at their history on GitHub.
Om, did you see a date for when Maven SCM would be released? The only response I got from the Maven folks was to build Maven SCM from sources. If it is going to be more than a week, I might actually try that.
-Alex
On 5/16/18, 11:46 AM, "Harbs" <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
Right now I’m pretty sure we have classes with changed package names. That will break existing applications.
I doubt we’re going to be finished with the “refactor” discussion before we get the 0.9.3 release out. I’d like to be sure that no package names are changed in this release. I don’t really care how we do that.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 16, 2018, at 7:54 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes currently
>> in develop?
>
>
> The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release
> branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick.
>
> What is the status of develop? Are there any tickets we can keep track of?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
>>>> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It
>> just
>>>> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been
>> cleaning
>>>> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt
>> because
>>>> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add, but
>>>> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not
>> about
>>>> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fmaven-scm%2Fpull%2F30&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=PxuJZQc8UOa2%2BQpmZY93SAsxnSn2Q6pK04%2BYi1kJK%2FE%3D&reserved=0. I’m tempted to wait until
>>>> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our
>> build
>>>> scripts to try to work around it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
>>> maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
>>>
>>> If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
>>> upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
>>> version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
>>> during installation. That should hopefully fix:
>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fissues%2F231&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=VOKTeSnHdtVN2KmYI%2FvNfS7u%2BrgcnlcIJf%2BhhKyG3RE%3D&reserved=0 <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fissues%2F231&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=VOKTeSnHdtVN2KmYI%2FvNfS7u%2BrgcnlcIJf%2BhhKyG3RE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>>>> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was running this command:
>>>>
>>>>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
>>>> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
>>>> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to
>>>> upgrade either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
>>>> here:
>>>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=WOPZRRAEr%2BBPchYRJS0187zmVvH0KMUB%2FLPieVq0Qes%3D&reserved=0
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=vR%2FZnJkAIYN1Y71pdoyM9v95B0I2f9rpdll%2BZ8kMC70%3D&reserved=0
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The last issue I faced was:
>>>>
>>>> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the
>> filename
>>>> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
>>>>
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=oGN0WqU3P84JtxERNZpX1novXJKPhTY5Q0MGAy1rACc%3D&reserved=0
>>>> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
>>>> application-for-windows
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But that did not work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
>>>>
>>>> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on
>>>> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for
>> the
>>>> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
>>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
>>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
>>>> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
>>>> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I
>> will
>>>> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
>>>> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
>>>>
>>>> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
>>>>
>>>> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
>>>> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com>
>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
>> OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think
>> i
>>>> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more
>> than
>>>> I already have.
>>>> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
>>>> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at
>> this
>>>> point.
>>>>
>>>> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fgithub.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=6sDxvKtfAPE35Iy6pBJ9EAVOE7LdfZ2%2B7DZf%2BuL%2BwRY%3D&reserved=0
>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=YH%2Fk68ubt9awy83JTyhQgAq3Zmc9PQrmW%2FSQt0PU8Cg%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
>>>> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
>>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <
>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
>>>> 2Fgithub.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fgithub.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=6sDxvKtfAPE35Iy6pBJ9EAVOE7LdfZ2%2B7DZf%2BuL%2BwRY%3D&reserved=0
>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105097613&sdata=YH%2Fk68ubt9awy83JTyhQgAq3Zmc9PQrmW%2FSQt0PU8Cg%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
>>>> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com>
>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
>> OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
>>>> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
>>>> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
>>>> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing
>> something.
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>>>> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
>>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
>>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
>>>> get input
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>>>> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code:
>> 2 ->
>>>> [Help 1]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
>>>> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
>>>> full debug logging.
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>>>> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0 <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=pFnkvvS6odCuw5ZseT3sVIXkAlz0HFURZ7DioNB8eDg%3D&reserved=0>.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprotection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fcwiki.apache.org%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=JO0yrP1ihdf4RMFELeSGN2GVWpbbTTNDDJrBF5ZR2O0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>>>> /
>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>> <
>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>>>> [exec] [INFO]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
>>>> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
>>>> ........... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
>>>> ................ SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
>>>> ................... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
>>>> ............... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
>>>> ................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
>>>> .................... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
>>>> ................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
>>>> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help
>> 1]
>>>> [exec] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
>>>> Maven with the -e switch.
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
>>>> debug logging.
>>>> [exec] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>> possible
>>>> solutions, please read the following articles:
>>>>
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0 <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=pFnkvvS6odCuw5ZseT3sVIXkAlz0HFURZ7DioNB8eDg%3D&reserved=0>.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprotection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fcwiki.apache.org%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=JO0yrP1ihdf4RMFELeSGN2GVWpbbTTNDDJrBF5ZR2O0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>>>> /
>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>> <
>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
>>>> returned: 1
>>>>
>>>> Total time: 52 seconds
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
>>>> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra
>>>> or going on hipchat to find out.
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fwww.apache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=O%2FoZrIZjvVhiIkXViKV9VposLGYkLT%2Bkw3UTSTc%2FRHU%3D&reserved=0
>>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
>>>> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww>.
>>>> apache.org <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=IWcx%2Fdllpoa7eAYbUGnat2YpbyQlLlvKH93%2FcTPRhUc%3D&reserved=0
>>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
>>>> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them.
>> There
>>>> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts
>> that
>>>> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of
>> release
>>>> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to
>> delete
>>>> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working
>> copy
>>>> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull
>> a
>>>> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>>>>
>>>> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
>>>> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I
>> still
>>>> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
>>>> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a
>> lot of
>>>> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>>>>
>>>> Good luck,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
>>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
>>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
>>>> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could
>> those
>>>> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>> I am getting this error:
>>>>
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
>>>> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have
>> local
>>>> modifications :
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>>>>
>>>> The pom.xml has only one change:
>>>>
>>>> <scm>
>>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.
>>>> git</connection>
>>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
>> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
>>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>>>> <tag>HEAD</tag>
>>>> </scm>
>>>>
>>>> changed to:
>>>>
>>>> <scm>
>>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.
>>>> git</connection>
>>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
>> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
>>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>>>> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
>>>> </scm>
>>>>
>>>> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
>>>> release process?
>>>> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0 <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=pFnkvvS6odCuw5ZseT3sVIXkAlz0HFURZ7DioNB8eDg%3D&reserved=0>.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fprotection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fgithub.com%25&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=oqYw5%2Fb3vPqaDzD5qkYkyTZPyJoraz48YohylL4VcAc%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
>>>> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
>>>> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0
>>> %7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
>>>> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
>>>> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui
>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>>
>> wrote:
>>>> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope
>> to
>>>> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter
>> whether
>>>> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a
>> few
>>>> weeks away.
>>>>
>>>> So, go for it!
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
>>>> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
>>>> [Last Call]
>>>> thread or is this it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
>>>> will be
>>>>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
>>>> we can
>>>>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
>>>> can follow
>>>>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Om,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2fgithub.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=xMO13%2BYvzPuA1wv1d%2FLt60D98uQQbG1staQCDIL6q7Y%3D&reserved=0
>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2f40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=loJgvM4NY%2FJKkJjP6aacQNYEdLu7RXYJSyXZOuewS6E%3D&reserved=0>&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
>> 40adobe.com <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=C7m9RsMzCyxtP8Y3xloE6R0HD8VC5i3fGwZeTGg3%2B0A%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
>>>> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
>>>>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
>>>> with VSCode.
>>>>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
>>>> process?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
>>>> Jewel theme
>>>>>> integration in the meantime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
>>>> a bunch of
>>>>> other
>>>>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
>>>> again to
>>>>> verify.
>>>>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
>>>>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
>>>> don't want to
>>>>> take
>>>>>>> the time to
>>>>>>>> find out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try this one:
>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
>>>> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
>>>>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
>>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
>>>>> 5e31%
>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
>>>>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
>>>> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
>>>> builds both a
>>>>>> js-swf
>>>>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
>>>> js-only
>>>>> package.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
>>>> but uses a
>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
>>>> while.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take a look at it now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>
>>>>> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C148581f8c5044ef904ff08d5bb5d5ed2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636620932105253869&sdata=vlRzEWYCJ0mOYPEgfAcIpSXCkM5%2FFqd%2FmCIic1t6opQ%3D&reserved=0.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
different *swcs* (I really need to turn off auto-correct…)
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:33 PM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> different secs
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
The last time I checked, the last commit that worked on existing apps was 88cffe995de541584024cbf38eb016acfc677f98
I have not checked develop for the last 11 commits or so. Unless package names have been reverted I assume the problem still exists.
I see three options:
1. Revert develop back to that commit and reapply any changes needed for the 0.9.3 release.
2. Branch develop from that commit for release and apply any changes needed to the release branch.
3. Change the package names back to what they were in develop. This last option would cause classes to be packaged in different secs than previous releases and I don’t *think* that alone should break existing apps...
Harbs
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:25 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So we just revert back develop to the last known good build? Sorry, I
> don't want to trample on anyone's changes, but we need to either do that or
> wait until all issues are fixed.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Right now I’m pretty sure we have classes with changed package names. That
>> will break existing applications.
>>
>> I doubt we’re going to be finished with the “refactor” discussion before
>> we get the 0.9.3 release out. I’d like to be sure that no package names are
>> changed in this release. I don’t really care how we do that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harbs
>>
>>
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 7:54 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes
>> currently
>>>> in develop?
>>>
>>>
>>> The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release
>>> branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick.
>>>
>>> What is the status of develop? Are there any tickets we can keep track
>> of?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>> <mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
>>>>>> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It
>>>> just
>>>>>> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been
>>>> cleaning
>>>>>> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt
>>>> because
>>>>>> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add,
>> but
>>>>>> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not
>>>> about
>>>>>> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait
>> until
>>>>>> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our
>>>> build
>>>>>> scripts to try to work around it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
>>>>> maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
>>>>> upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
>>>>> version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
>>>>> during installation. That should hopefully fix:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231 <
>>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Om
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of
>> OmPrakash
>>>>>> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>>>>>> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was running this command:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
>>>>>> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
>>>>>> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk
>> to
>>>>>> upgrade either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-
>> powershell.aspx/
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%
>> 2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuam
>> Bvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%
>> 2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%
>> 2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The last issue I faced was:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the
>>>> filename
>>>>>> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-
>>>>>> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
>>>>>> application-for-windows
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%
>> 2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-
>> and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%
>> 2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But that did not work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>> <mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created
>> on
>>>>>> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for
>>>> the
>>>>>> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
>>>>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
>>>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
>>>>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
>>>>>> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
>>>>>> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I
>>>> will
>>>>>> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to
>> where
>>>>>> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
>>>>>> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
>> <mailto:
>>>> omuppi1@gmail.com>
>>>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
>>>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>>>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think
>>>> i
>>>>>> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more
>>>> than
>>>>>> I already have.
>>>>>> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release
>> candidate
>>>>>> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at
>>>> this
>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>>>> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
>>>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>>>> http://40adobe.com/>%
>>>>>> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
>>>>>> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
>>>>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <
>>>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
>>>>>> 2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
>>>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
>>>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636610574790159284&sdata=
>>>>>> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check
>> tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
>> <mailto:
>>>> omuppi1@gmail.com>
>>>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
>>>> OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>>>> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
>>>>>> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>>>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
>>>>>> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
>>>>>> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing
>>>> something.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>>>>>> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
>>>>>> get input
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>>>>>> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code:
>>>> 2 ->
>>>>>> [Help 1]
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the
>> errors,
>>>>>> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to
>> enable
>>>>>> full debug logging.
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>>>>>> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks/>.
>>>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
>>>> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>>>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>>>>>> /
>>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>> 2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>> <
>>>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>>>>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO]
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
>>>>>> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
>>>>>> ........... SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
>>>>>> ................ SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
>>>>>> ................... SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
>>>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
>>>>>> ............... SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
>>>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
>>>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
>>>>>> ................. SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
>>>>>> .................... SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
>>>>>> ................. SKIPPED
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
>>>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>>>>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
>>>>>> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' ->
>> [Help
>>>> 1]
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR]
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
>> re-run
>>>>>> Maven with the -e switch.
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
>>>>>> debug logging.
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR]
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>>>> possible
>>>>>> solutions, please read the following articles:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks/>.
>>>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
>>>> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>>>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>>>>>> /
>>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>> 2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>> <
>>>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>>>>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>>> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
>>>>>> returned: 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Total time: 52 seconds
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>>>> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
>>>>>> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing
>> users@infra
>>>>>> or going on hipchat to find out.
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <http://2fwww.apache.org/
>>>>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
>>>>>> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>>>> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww>.
>>>>>> apache.org <http://apache.org/
>>>>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>>>> http://40adobe.com/>%
>>>>>> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
>>>>>> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them.
>>>> There
>>>>>> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts
>>>> that
>>>>>> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of
>>>> release
>>>>>> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to
>>>> delete
>>>>>> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working
>>>> copy
>>>>>> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should
>> pull
>>>> a
>>>>>> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
>>>>>> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I
>>>> still
>>>>>> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
>>>>>> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a
>>>> lot of
>>>>>> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good luck,
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
>>>>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>>>> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
>>>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
>>>>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>>>> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>>> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
>>>>>> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could
>>>> those
>>>>>> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I am getting this error:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>>>>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
>>>>>> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have
>>>> local
>>>>>> modifications :
>>>>>> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The pom.xml has only one change:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <scm>
>>>>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>>>> :apache/royale-asjs.
>>>>>> git</connection>
>>>>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
>>>> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
>>>>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>>>>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>>>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>>>>>> <tag>HEAD</tag>
>>>>>> </scm>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> changed to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <scm>
>>>>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>>>> :apache/royale-asjs.
>>>>>> git</connection>
>>>>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
>>>> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
>>>>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>>>>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>>>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>>>>>> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
>>>>>> </scm>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
>>>>>> release process?
>>>>>> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks/>.
>>>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <
>>>> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%>
>>>>>> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>>>> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
>>>>>> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
>>>>>> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>>>> %7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
>>>>>> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
>>>>>> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui
>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope
>>>> to
>>>>>> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter
>>>> whether
>>>>>> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a
>>>> few
>>>>>> weeks away.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, go for it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
>>>>>> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>>>> omuppi1@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><
>> mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
>>>>>> [Last Call]
>>>>>> thread or is this it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
>>>>>> will be
>>>>>>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
>>>>>> we can
>>>>>>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
>>>>>> can follow
>>>>>>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Om,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
>>>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>>>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>>>> http://40adobe.com/>
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
>> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
>> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <http://2f40adobe.com/>&data=
>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%
>>>> 40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
>>>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
>>>>>> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>>>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>>> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
>>>>>>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
>>>>>> with VSCode.
>>>>>>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
>>>>>> process?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
>>>>>> Jewel theme
>>>>>>>> integration in the meantime.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
>>>>>> a bunch of
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
>>>>>> again to
>>>>>>> verify.
>>>>>>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
>>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
>>>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
>>>>>>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
>>>>>> don't want to
>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>> the time to
>>>>>>>>>> find out.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Try this one:
>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=
>> jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
>>>>>> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>>>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
>>>>>>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
>>>>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
>> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
>>>>>>> 5e31%
>>>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>>>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
>>>>>>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
>>>>>> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
>>>>>> builds both a
>>>>>>>> js-swf
>>>>>>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
>>>>>> js-only
>>>>>>> package.
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
>>>>>> but uses a
>>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
>>>>>> while.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will take a look at it now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
>>>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV
>> 8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
>> mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>>>>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>>>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
>> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>>>
>>>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7c
>> d94a%
>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV
>> 8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
>> mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>>>>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>>>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>>>> <
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
>> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>>>
>>>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7c
>> d94a%
>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
So we just revert back develop to the last known good build? Sorry, I
don't want to trample on anyone's changes, but we need to either do that or
wait until all issues are fixed.
Thoughts?
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Right now I’m pretty sure we have classes with changed package names. That
> will break existing applications.
>
> I doubt we’re going to be finished with the “refactor” discussion before
> we get the 0.9.3 release out. I’d like to be sure that no package names are
> changed in this release. I don’t really care how we do that.
>
> Thanks,
> Harbs
>
>
> > On May 16, 2018, at 7:54 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes
> currently
> >> in develop?
> >
> >
> > The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release
> > branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick.
> >
> > What is the status of develop? Are there any tickets we can keep track
> of?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> >
> >>> On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
> >>>> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It
> >> just
> >>>> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been
> >> cleaning
> >>>> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt
> >> because
> >>>> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add,
> but
> >>>> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not
> >> about
> >>>> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait
> until
> >>>> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our
> >> build
> >>>> scripts to try to work around it.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
> >>> maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
> >>>
> >>> If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
> >>> upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
> >>> version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
> >>> during installation. That should hopefully fix:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231 <
> >> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of
> OmPrakash
> >>>> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> >>>> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
> >>>>
> >>>> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> >>>> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> >>>> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I was running this command:
> >>>>
> >>>>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
> >>>> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
> >>>> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk
> to
> >>>> upgrade either.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
> >>>> here:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-
> powershell.aspx/
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%
> 2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuam
> Bvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%
> 2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%
> 2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The last issue I faced was:
> >>>>
> >>>> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the
> >> filename
> >>>> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-
> >>>> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
> >>>> application-for-windows
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%
> 2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-
> and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%
> 2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> But that did not work.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Om,
> >>>>
> >>>> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created
> on
> >>>> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for
> >> the
> >>>> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
> >>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
> >>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
> >>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
> >>>> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Om,
> >>>>
> >>>> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
> >>>> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I
> >> will
> >>>> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to
> where
> >>>> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
> >>>>
> >>>> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
> >>>> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com>
> >>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
> >> OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> >>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
> >>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think
> >> i
> >>>> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more
> >> than
> >>>> I already have.
> >>>> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release
> candidate
> >>>> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at
> >> this
> >>>> point.
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> >> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
> >>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> >>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> >> http://40adobe.com/>%
> >>>> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
> >>>> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
> >>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <
> >> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
> >>>> 2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
> >>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636610574790159284&sdata=
> >>>> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check
> tomorrow.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com>
> >>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
> >> OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> >>>> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
> >>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>>> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
> >>>> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
> >>>> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing
> >> something.
> >>>>
> >>>> <snip>
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> >>>> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
> >>>> get input
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> >>>> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code:
> >> 2 ->
> >>>> [Help 1]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the
> errors,
> >>>> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to
> enable
> >>>> full debug logging.
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> >>>> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
> >> https://na01.safelinks/>.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
> >> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> >>>> /
> >> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> 2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >> <
> >> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >>>
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> >>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> >>>> [exec] [INFO]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> >>>> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> >>>> ........... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> >>>> ................ SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> >>>> ................... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> >>>> .................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> >>>> ............... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> >>>> .................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> >>>> .................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> >>>> ................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> >>>> .................... SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> >>>> ................. SKIPPED
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
> >>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >>>> ------------------------------------------
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
> >>>> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' ->
> [Help
> >> 1]
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> re-run
> >>>> Maven with the -e switch.
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
> >>>> debug logging.
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR]
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> >> possible
> >>>> solutions, please read the following articles:
> >>>>
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
> >> https://na01.safelinks/>.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
> >> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> >>>> /
> >> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> 2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >> <
> >> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >>>
> >>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> >>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> >>>>
> >>>> BUILD FAILED
> >>>> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
> >>>> returned: 1
> >>>>
> >>>> Total time: 52 seconds
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> >> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Om,
> >>>>
> >>>> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
> >>>> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing
> users@infra
> >>>> or going on hipchat to find out.
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <http://2fwww.apache.org/
> >>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
> >>>> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww>.
> >>>> apache.org <http://apache.org/
> >>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> >> http://40adobe.com/>%
> >>>> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
> >>>> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them.
> >> There
> >>>> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts
> >> that
> >>>> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of
> >> release
> >>>> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to
> >> delete
> >>>> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working
> >> copy
> >>>> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should
> pull
> >> a
> >>>> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
> >>>> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I
> >> still
> >>>> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
> >>>> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a
> >> lot of
> >>>> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
> >>>>
> >>>> Good luck,
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
> >>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> >>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >>>> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
> >>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >>>> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> >>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>>> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
> >>>> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could
> >> those
> >>>> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>>> I am getting this error:
> >>>>
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> >>>> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have
> >> local
> >>>> modifications :
> >>>> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
> >>>>
> >>>> The pom.xml has only one change:
> >>>>
> >>>> <scm>
> >>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.
> >>>> git</connection>
> >>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
> >> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
> >>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> >>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> >>>> <tag>HEAD</tag>
> >>>> </scm>
> >>>>
> >>>> changed to:
> >>>>
> >>>> <scm>
> >>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.
> >>>> git</connection>
> >>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
> >> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
> >>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> >>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> >>>> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
> >>>> </scm>
> >>>>
> >>>> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
> >>>> release process?
> >>>> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks <
> >> https://na01.safelinks/>.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <
> >> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%>
> >>>> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
> >>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >>>> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
> >>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
> >>>> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
> >>>> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >>> %7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
> >>>> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
> >>>> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui
> >> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>>
> >> wrote:
> >>>> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope
> >> to
> >>>> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter
> >> whether
> >>>> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a
> >> few
> >>>> weeks away.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, go for it!
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com
> >>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
> >>>> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> >> omuppi1@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><
> mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
> >>>> [Last Call]
> >>>> thread or is this it?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
> >>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
> >>>> will be
> >>>>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
> >>>> we can
> >>>>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
> >>>> can follow
> >>>>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Om,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
> >>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> >>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> >> http://40adobe.com/>
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <http://2f40adobe.com/>&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%
> >> 40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
> >>>> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> >>>>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>>> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> >>>>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
> >>>> with VSCode.
> >>>>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> >>>> process?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
> >>>> Jewel theme
> >>>>>> integration in the meantime.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Om
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> >>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
> >>>> a bunch of
> >>>>> other
> >>>>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> >>>> again to
> >>>>> verify.
> >>>>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> >>>> release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> HTH,
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
> >>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> >>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> >>>>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
> >>>> don't want to
> >>>>> take
> >>>>>>> the time to
> >>>>>>>> find out.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Try this one:
> >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=
> jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
> >>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> >>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
> >>>> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> >>>>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> >>>>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> >>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> >>>>> 5e31%
> >>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> >>>>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
> >>>> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
> >>>> builds both a
> >>>>>> js-swf
> >>>>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
> >>>> js-only
> >>>>> package.
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
> >>>> but uses a
> >>>>>> different
> >>>>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
> >>>> while.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will take a look at it now.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
> >>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV
> 8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
> mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> >>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> >>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> >>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>>>
> >> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7c
> d94a%
> >>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV
> 8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
> mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> >>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> >>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >>>> <
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%
> 2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> >>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>>>
> >> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7c
> d94a%
> >>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Right now I’m pretty sure we have classes with changed package names. That will break existing applications.
I doubt we’re going to be finished with the “refactor” discussion before we get the 0.9.3 release out. I’d like to be sure that no package names are changed in this release. I don’t really care how we do that.
Thanks,
Harbs
> On May 16, 2018, at 7:54 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes currently
>> in develop?
>
>
> The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release
> branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick.
>
> What is the status of develop? Are there any tickets we can keep track of?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>
>>> On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
>>>> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It
>> just
>>>> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been
>> cleaning
>>>> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt
>> because
>>>> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add, but
>>>> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not
>> about
>>>> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
>>>> https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait until
>>>> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our
>> build
>>>> scripts to try to work around it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
>>> maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
>>>
>>> If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
>>> upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
>>> version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
>>> during installation. That should hopefully fix:
>>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231 <
>> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
>>>>
>>>> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>>>> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
>>>> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I was running this command:
>>>>
>>>>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
>>>> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
>>>> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to
>>>> upgrade either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
>>>> here:
>>>>
>>>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-powershell.aspx/
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The last issue I faced was:
>>>>
>>>> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the
>> filename
>>>> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
>>>>
>>>> https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-
>>>> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
>>>> application-for-windows
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>>
>>>> But that did not work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
>>>>
>>>> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on
>>>> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for
>> the
>>>> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
>>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
>>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
>>>> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
>>>> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I
>> will
>>>> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
>>>> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
>>>>
>>>> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
>>>>
>>>> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
>>>> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com>
>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
>> OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think
>> i
>>>> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more
>> than
>>>> I already have.
>>>> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
>>>> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at
>> this
>>>> point.
>>>>
>>>> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>> http://40adobe.com/>%
>>>> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
>>>> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
>>>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <
>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
>>>> 2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
>>>> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com>
>>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
>> OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
>>>> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>>>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
>>>> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
>>>> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing
>> something.
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>>>> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
>>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
>>>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
>>>> get input
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>>>> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code:
>> 2 ->
>>>> [Help 1]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
>>>> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
>>>> full debug logging.
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>>>> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
>>>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
>> https://na01.safelinks/>.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
>> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>>>> /
>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>> <
>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>>>> [exec] [INFO]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
>>>> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
>>>> ........... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
>>>> ................ SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
>>>> ................... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
>>>> ............... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
>>>> .................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
>>>> ................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
>>>> .................... SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
>>>> ................. SKIPPED
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>>>> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
>>>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
>>>> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help
>> 1]
>>>> [exec] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
>>>> Maven with the -e switch.
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
>>>> debug logging.
>>>> [exec] [ERROR]
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>> possible
>>>> solutions, please read the following articles:
>>>>
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
>> https://na01.safelinks/>.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
>> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>>>> /
>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>> <
>> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
>>>
>>>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>>>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>>>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>>> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>>>
>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
>>>> returned: 1
>>>>
>>>> Total time: 52 seconds
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
>> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>>>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Om,
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
>>>> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra
>>>> or going on hipchat to find out.
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <http://2fwww.apache.org/
>>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
>>>> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww>.
>>>> apache.org <http://apache.org/
>>> %2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>> http://40adobe.com/>%
>>>> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
>>>> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them.
>> There
>>>> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts
>> that
>>>> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of
>> release
>>>> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to
>> delete
>>>> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working
>> copy
>>>> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull
>> a
>>>> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>>>>
>>>> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
>>>> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I
>> still
>>>> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
>>>> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a
>> lot of
>>>> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>>>>
>>>> Good luck,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
>>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
>>>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>>>> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
>>>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>>> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
>>>> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could
>> those
>>>> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>> I am getting this error:
>>>>
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>>>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
>>>> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have
>> local
>>>> modifications :
>>>> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>>>>
>>>> The pom.xml has only one change:
>>>>
>>>> <scm>
>>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.
>>>> git</connection>
>>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
>> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
>>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>>>> <tag>HEAD</tag>
>>>> </scm>
>>>>
>>>> changed to:
>>>>
>>>> <scm>
>>>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.
>>>> git</connection>
>>>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
>> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
>>>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>>>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
>>> :apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>>>> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
>>>> </scm>
>>>>
>>>> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
>>>> release process?
>>>> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks <
>> https://na01.safelinks/>.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <
>> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%>
>>>> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>>>> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
>>>> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
>>>> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
>>> %7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
>>>> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
>>>> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui
>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>>
>> wrote:
>>>> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope
>> to
>>>> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter
>> whether
>>>> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a
>> few
>>>> weeks away.
>>>>
>>>> So, go for it!
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
>>>> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
>> omuppi1@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
>>>> [Last Call]
>>>> thread or is this it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
>>>> will be
>>>>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
>>>> we can
>>>>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
>>>> can follow
>>>>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>>>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Om,
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
>>> %2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
>> http://40adobe.com/>
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <http://2f40adobe.com/>&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
>> 40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
>>>> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
>>>>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
>>>> with VSCode.
>>>>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
>>>> process?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
>>>> Jewel theme
>>>>>> integration in the meantime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Om
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
>>>> a bunch of
>>>>> other
>>>>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
>>>> again to
>>>>> verify.
>>>>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
>>>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
>>>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
>>>>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
>>>> don't want to
>>>>> take
>>>>>>> the time to
>>>>>>>> find out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try this one:
>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
>>>> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
>>>>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
>>>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
>>>>> 5e31%
>>>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
>>>>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
>>>> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
>>>> builds both a
>>>>>> js-swf
>>>>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
>>>> js-only
>>>>> package.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
>>>> but uses a
>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
>>>> while.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take a look at it now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>
>>>>> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
>>>> protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
>>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>>>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>>>> <
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>>>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>>>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>>>>
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 16, 2018, 9:42 AM Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes currently
> in develop?
The fixes need to go into develop so that we can simply cut a release
branch of off develop. If not we will have to cherry pick.
What is the status of develop? Are there any tickets we can keep track of?
Thanks,
Om
> > On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
> >> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It
> just
> >> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been
> cleaning
> >> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt
> because
> >> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add, but
> >> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not
> about
> >> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
> >> https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait until
> >> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our
> build
> >> scripts to try to work around it.
> >>
> >
> > Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
> > maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
> >
> > If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
> > upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
> > version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
> > during installation. That should hopefully fix:
> > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231 <
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
> >> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> >> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
> >>
> >> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> >> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> >> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I was running this command:
> >>
> >>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
> >> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
> >> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to
> >> upgrade either.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
> >> here:
> >>
> >> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-powershell.aspx/
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>
> >> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The last issue I faced was:
> >>
> >> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the
> filename
> >> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
> >>
> >> https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-
> >> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
> >> application-for-windows
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >>
> >> But that did not work.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Om
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
> >>
> >> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Om,
> >>
> >> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on
> >> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
> >>
> >> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for
> the
> >> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>>
> >> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
> >> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
> >> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> >> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
> >> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >> Hi Om,
> >>
> >> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
> >> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I
> will
> >> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
> >> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
> >>
> >> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
> >>
> >> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
> >> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com>
> >> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
> OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> >> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>
> >> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think
> i
> >> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more
> than
> >> I already have.
> >> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
> >> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at
> this
> >> point.
> >>
> >> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
> >%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> >> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> http://40adobe.com/>%
> >> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
> >> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
> >> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <
> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
> >> 2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
> >%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
> >> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
> >> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
> >>
> >> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com>
> >> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of
> OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> >> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
> >> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >>
> >> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
> >> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
> >> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing
> something.
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> >> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
> >> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
> >> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
> >> get input
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
> >> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> >> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code:
> 2 ->
> >> [Help 1]
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> >> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
> >> full debug logging.
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> >> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
> >> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
> https://na01.safelinks/>.
> >> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
> >> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> >> /
> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> <
> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >
> >> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> >> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> >>
> >> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> >> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> >> [exec] [INFO]
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> >> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> >> ........... SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> >> ................ SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> >> ................... SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> >> .................. SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> >> ............... SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> >> .................. SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> >> .................. SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> >> ................. SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> >> .................... SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> >> ................. SKIPPED
> >> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
> >> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> >> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
> >> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> ------------------------------------------
> >> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
> >> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help
> 1]
> >> [exec] [ERROR]
> >> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
> >> Maven with the -e switch.
> >> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
> >> debug logging.
> >> [exec] [ERROR]
> >> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> possible
> >> solutions, please read the following articles:
> >>
> >> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <
> https://na01.safelinks/>.
> >> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <
> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
> >> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> >> /
> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> <
> http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> >
> >> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> >> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> >> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> >> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> >>
> >> BUILD FAILED
> >> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
> >> returned: 1
> >>
> >> Total time: 52 seconds
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com
> <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> >> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
> >> Hi Om,
> >>
> >> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
> >> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra
> >> or going on hipchat to find out.
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <http://2fwww.apache.org/
> >%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
> >> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww>.
> >> apache.org <http://apache.org/
> >%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> http://40adobe.com/>%
> >> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
> >> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
> >>
> >> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them.
> There
> >> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts
> that
> >> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of
> release
> >> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to
> delete
> >> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working
> copy
> >> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull
> a
> >> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
> >>
> >> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
> >> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I
> still
> >> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
> >> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a
> lot of
> >> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
> >>
> >> Good luck,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
> >> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> >> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
> >> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com><mailto:b
> >> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
> >> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> >> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> >> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:
> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
> >>
> >> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
> >> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could
> those
> >> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >> I am getting this error:
> >>
> >> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> >> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> >> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have
> local
> >> modifications :
> >> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
> >>
> >> The pom.xml has only one change:
> >>
> >> <scm>
> >> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >:apache/royale-asjs.
> >> git</connection>
> >> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
> >> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> >> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> >> <tag>HEAD</tag>
> >> </scm>
> >>
> >> changed to:
> >>
> >> <scm>
> >> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >:apache/royale-asjs.
> >> git</connection>
> >> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:
> git@github.com>:apache/royale-
> >> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> >> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <mailto:git@github.com
> >:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> >> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
> >> </scm>
> >>
> >> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
> >> release process?
> >> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks <
> https://na01.safelinks/>.
> >> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <
> http://protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%>
> >> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
> >> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> >> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
> >> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
> >> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/
> >%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
> >> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
> >> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>>
> wrote:
> >> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope
> to
> >> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter
> whether
> >> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a
> few
> >> weeks away.
> >>
> >> So, go for it!
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com
> ><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
> >> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <mailto:
> omuppi1@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
> >> [Last Call]
> >> thread or is this it?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
> >> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
> >> will be
> >>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
> >> we can
> >>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
> >> can follow
> >>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> >> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Om,
> >>>
> >>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/
> >%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> >>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <
> http://40adobe.com/>
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
> >> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <http://2f40adobe.com/>&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
> >> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
> >> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> >>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> >>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>> Piotr
> >>>
> >>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> >> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:
> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
> >>>
> >>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
> >> with VSCode.
> >>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> >> process?
> >>>>
> >>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
> >> Jewel theme
> >>>> integration in the meantime.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Om
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> >>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
> >> a bunch of
> >>> other
> >>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> >> again to
> >>> verify.
> >>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> >> release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> HTH,
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
> >> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> >>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> >>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
> >> don't want to
> >>> take
> >>>>> the time to
> >>>>>> find out.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Try this one:
> >>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
> >> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> >> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
> >> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> >>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> >>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> >>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> >>> 5e31%
> >>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> >>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
> >> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
> >> builds both a
> >>>> js-swf
> >>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
> >> js-only
> >>> package.
> >>>> The
> >>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
> >> but uses a
> >>>> different
> >>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
> >> while.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will take a look at it now.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>
> >>> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
> >> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> >> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> >>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> >> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> >>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> >> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> >>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> >> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> >> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> >>
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> >>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Can we make sure the release does not have any breaking changes currently in develop?
> On May 16, 2018, at 2:58 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>> wrote:
>
>> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
>> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It just
>> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been cleaning
>> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt because
>> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
>>
>>
>>
>> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add, but
>> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not about
>> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
>> https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait until
>> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our build
>> scripts to try to work around it.
>>
>
> Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
> maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
>
> If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
> upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
> version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
> during installation. That should hopefully fix:
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231 <https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231>
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
>> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
>>
>> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>
>>
>>
>> I was running this command:
>>
>>> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
>> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
>>
>>
>>
>> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
>> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to
>> upgrade either.
>>
>>
>>
>> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
>> here:
>>
>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-powershell.aspx/
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>
>>
>> The last issue I faced was:
>>
>> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the filename
>> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
>>
>> https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-
>> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
>> application-for-windows
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> But that did not work.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Om
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
>>
>> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Om,
>>
>> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on
>> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
>>
>> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for the
>> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>
>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>" <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>
>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:aharu
>> i@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>> Hi Om,
>>
>> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
>> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will
>> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
>> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>>
>>
>>
>> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
>>
>> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
>>
>> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
>> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>
>> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i
>> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than
>> I already have.
>> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
>> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this
>> point.
>>
>> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/>%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
>> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
>> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
>> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F% <http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%>
>> 2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/>%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
>> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>" <omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
>> <mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
>> To: "dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <
>> dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>> Cc: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>>
>> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
>> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
>> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
>>
>> <snip>
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
>> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
>> get input
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
>> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
>> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 ->
>> [Help 1]
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
>> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
>> full debug logging.
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
>> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
>> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <https://na01.safelinks/>.
>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>> /na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>> [exec] [INFO]
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
>> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
>> ........... SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
>> ................ SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
>> ................... SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
>> .................. SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
>> ............... SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
>> .................. SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
>> .................. SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
>> ................. SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
>> .................... SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
>> ................. SKIPPED
>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
>> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
>> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------
>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
>> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
>> [exec] [ERROR]
>> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
>> Maven with the -e switch.
>> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
>> debug logging.
>> [exec] [ERROR]
>> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
>> solutions, please read the following articles:
>>
>> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks <https://na01.safelinks/>.
>> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <http://protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
>> /na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org% <http://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%>
>> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
>> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
>> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
>> returned: 1
>>
>> Total time: 52 seconds
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:
>> aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
>> Hi Om,
>>
>> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
>> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra
>> or going on hipchat to find out.
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org <http://2fwww.apache.org/>%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
>> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww>.
>> apache.org <http://apache.org/>%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
>> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
>> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There
>> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that
>> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release
>> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete
>> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy
>> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a
>> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>>
>> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
>> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still
>> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
>> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of
>> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>>
>> Good luck,
>> -Alex
>>
>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:b
>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
>> To: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com><mailto:aharui@adobe.com <ma...@adobe.com>>>
>> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:b
>> igosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>
>> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
>> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>> To: <dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org><mailto:dev@royale.apache.org <ma...@royale.apache.org>>>
>>
>> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
>> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those
>> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>> I am getting this error:
>>
>> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
>> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
>> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local
>> modifications :
>> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>>
>> The pom.xml has only one change:
>>
>> <scm>
>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <ma...@github.com>:apache/royale-asjs.
>> git</connection>
>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <ma...@github.com>:apache/royale-
>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <ma...@github.com>:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>> <tag>HEAD</tag>
>> </scm>
>>
>> changed to:
>>
>> <scm>
>> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com <ma...@github.com>:apache/royale-asjs.
>> git</connection>
>> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com <ma...@github.com>:apache/royale-
>> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>> <url>scm:git:git@github.com <ma...@github.com>:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
>> </scm>
>>
>> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
>> release process?
>> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks <https://na01.safelinks/>.
>> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com% <http://protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%>
>> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
>> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub>.
>> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
>> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
>> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
>> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>
>> <mailto:aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>> wrote:
>> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to
>> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether
>> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few
>> weeks away.
>>
>> So, go for it!
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> on
>> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:omuppi1@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
>> [Last Call]
>> thread or is this it?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Om
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
>> will be
>>> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
>> we can
>>> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
>> can follow
>>> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
>> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Om,
>>>
>>> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>>>
>>> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com <http://2fgithub.com/>%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
>>> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0 <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url= <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=>
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com <http://2f40adobe.com/>&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com <http://40adobe.com/>%
>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
>> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
>>> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
>>> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> Piotr
>>>
>>> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
>> bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com><mailto:bigosmallm@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>>:
>>>
>>>> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
>> with VSCode.
>>>> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
>> process?
>>>>
>>>> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
>> Jewel theme
>>>> integration in the meantime.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
>>> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
>> a bunch of
>>> other
>>>>> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
>> again to
>>> verify.
>>>>> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> HTH,
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
>> <aharui@adobe.com.INVALID <ma...@adobe.com.INVALID>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
>>> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
>>>> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that's been broken forever. But I
>> don't want to
>>> take
>>>>> the time to
>>>>>> find out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try this one:
>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>>>> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
>> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
>>>>> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
>>>>> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
>>>>> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
>>> 5e31%
>>>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
>>>>> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
>> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What is this package supposed to install?
>>>>>
>>>>> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
>> builds both a
>>>> js-swf
>>>>> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
>> js-only
>>> package.
>>>> The
>>>>> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
>> but uses a
>>>> different
>>>>> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
>> while.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take a look at it now.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>>
>>> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
>> protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
>>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
>> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
>>> 7Caharui%40adobe.com
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
>> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
>> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
>>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
>>> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows
> with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It just
> worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been cleaning
> up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt because
> something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
>
>
>
> So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add, but
> it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not about
> filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project
> https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait until
> the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our build
> scripts to try to work around it.
>
Alex, I think that should be fine. It looks like the new version of
maven-scm will be released imminently. Let's wait for it :-)
If you are going to do the release, can you make sure that you create
upgrade to the latest versions of node.js and npm? It appears that the
version mismatches are causing the `npm WARN tar invalid entry ` logs
during installation. That should hopefully fix:
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues/231
Thanks,
Om
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
>
> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
> I was running this command:
>
> > ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
> -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
>
>
>
> I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
> indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to
> upgrade either.
>
>
>
> So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps
> here:
>
> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-powershell.aspx/
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0>
>
> https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> The last issue I faced was:
>
> There were too many files in the git add command which caused the filename
> too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
>
> https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-
> solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-
> application-for-windows
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0>
>
> But that did not work.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
>
> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi Om,
>
> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on
> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
>
> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for the
> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
> To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:aharu
> i@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will
> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>
>
>
> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
>
> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
>
> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
> -Alex
>
> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i
> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than
> I already have.
> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this
> point.
>
> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> 2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>
> -Alex
>
> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> To: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
>
> <snip>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
> get input
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 ->
> [Help 1]
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
> full debug logging.
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> /na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>
> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [exec] [INFO]
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> ........... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> ................ SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> ................... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> .................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> ............... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> .................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> .................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> ................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> .................... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> ................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
> [exec] [ERROR]
> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
> Maven with the -e switch.
> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
> debug logging.
> [exec] [ERROR]
> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> solutions, please read the following articles:
>
> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> /na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
> returned: 1
>
> Total time: 52 seconds
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra
> or going on hipchat to find out.
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>
> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There
> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that
> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release
> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete
> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy
> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a
> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>
> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still
> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of
> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>
> Good luck,
> -Alex
>
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com<mailto:b
> igosmallm@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com<mailto:b
> igosmallm@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>
>
> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those
> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I am getting this error:
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local
> modifications :
> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>
> The pom.xml has only one change:
>
> <scm>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.
> git</connection>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> <tag>HEAD</tag>
> </scm>
>
> changed to:
>
> <scm>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.
> git</connection>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
> </scm>
>
> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
> release process?
> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%
> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>> wrote:
> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to
> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether
> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few
> weeks away.
>
> So, go for it!
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> on
> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com>
> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
> [Last Call]
> thread or is this it?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
> will be
> > things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
> we can
> > make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
> can follow
> > these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Om,
> >
> > I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >
> > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> > 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> > 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> > fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>:
> >
> > > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
> with VSCode.
> > > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> process?
> > >
> > > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
> Jewel theme
> > > integration in the meantime.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
> a bunch of
> > other
> > > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> again to
> > verify.
> > > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> release.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
> <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I
> don't want to
> > take
> > > > the time to
> > > > > find out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try this one:
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> > 5e31%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > > >
> > > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
> builds both a
> > > js-swf
> > > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
> js-only
> > package.
> > > The
> > > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
> but uses a
> > > different
> > > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
> while.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look at it now.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eY
> lSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0>
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> 2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Update: I’ve been trying to get the release script to work on Windows with Powershell. I didn’t have to go through the links Om used. It just worked for me, but I’ve been getting other failures that I’ve been cleaning up. Annoyingly, I have to reboot my computer before each attempt because something makes the repo folder appear locked until I reboot.
So finally, today, I was able to reproduce Om’s issue about Git Add, but it is really about the command-line for Git Add being too long, not about filenames being too long. I found this PR in the Maven project https://github.com/apache/maven-scm/pull/30. I’m tempted to wait until the next Maven release so we don’t have to spend time refactoring our build scripts to try to work around it.
Thanks,
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, May 7, 2018 at 11:23 AM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
I was running this command:
> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven -Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to upgrade either.
So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps here:
https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-powershell.aspx/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F13%2Fbetter-git-with-powershell.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=06zTLxxoXtuu2H9Wb75itVLiV7yuamBvi6t5l6NOr8E%3D&reserved=0>
https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhaacked.com%2Farchive%2F2011%2F12%2F19%2Fget-git-for-windows.aspx%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=gIqBNB5HORzxt%2BDlcENBWpYYlNe2w8YgUWLSL16KZ4s%3D&reserved=0>
The last issue I faced was:
There were too many files in the git add command which caused the filename too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fourcodeworld.com%2Farticles%2Fread%2F109%2Fhow-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=iRsnBnWzlJPLDwogRtIY%2Fl6D2%2FlENkuHAA8iPuPHvIA%3D&reserved=0>
But that did not work.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
Hi Om,
I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for the gpg-agent problem and anything else?
Thanks,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
Hi Om,
I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
Thanks,
Om
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>" <om...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than I already have.
I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this point.
Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki? https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>" <om...@gmail.com>>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>>
Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
To: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>>
Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
<snip>
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
[exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
[exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get input
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
[exec] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
[exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
BUILD FAILED
C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
Total time: 52 seconds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>> wrote:
Hi Om,
FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or going on hipchat to find out.
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
Good luck,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>>
Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>>
Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>>
Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>>
Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
I am getting this error:
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local modifications :
[exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
The pom.xml has only one change:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>HEAD</tag>
</scm>
changed to:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
</scm>
Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release process?
It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>>> wrote:
Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few weeks away.
So, go for it!
-Alex
On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com>> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=jaPlUc%2BUGq3VnDNpNsBddM8Goj3CeGnFl1y%2By%2BPkvyg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=%2BsE2dXOAmWpxCeWZtOTDQJL5fGToV8NXsP%2B%2BiqvrRrg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C06a1254b3e6a444c187208d5b4479214%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636613141894587256&sdata=ufHWCbuo7fZ3N%2BO2BB%2FC32Oq2uvBlfWzsSGnEo8ObBg%3D&reserved=0><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I was running this command:
> ant -f releasecandidate.xml "-Drelease.version=0.9.3" -Drc=1 maven
-Dbrowser="/mnt/c/Program Files/Mozilla Firefox/firefox.exe"
I could not fix Git Bash to use gpg-agent. The gpg and gpg-agent were
indeed running two different versions. I dint want to take the risk to
upgrade either.
So, I figured out how to get PowerShell working by following the steps here:
https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/13/better-git-with-powershell.aspx/
https://haacked.com/archive/2011/12/19/get-git-for-windows.aspx/
The last issue I faced was:
There were too many files in the git add command which caused the filename
too long issue. I tried to fix it by following directions here:
https://ourcodeworld.com/articles/read/109/how-to-solve-filename-too-long-error-in-git-powershell-and-github-application-for-windows
But that did not work.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
>
> I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi Om,
>
> I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on
> my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
>
> Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for the
> gpg-agent problem and anything else?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
> To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:aharu
> i@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important
> to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will
> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>
>
>
> I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
>
> I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
>
> And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things
> back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
> -Alex
>
> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
> Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i
> am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than
> I already have.
> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this
> point.
>
> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%
> 2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://
> na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> 2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=
> pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>
> -Alex
>
> From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <omuppi1@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> To: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <
> dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>>
> Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the
> second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and
> ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
>
> <snip>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't
> get input
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 ->
> [Help 1]
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable
> full debug logging.
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> /na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [exec] [INFO]
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common
> ........... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils
> ................ SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc
> ................... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler
> .................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX
> ............... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils
> .................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger
> .................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer
> ................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks
> .................... SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin
> ................. SKIPPED
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
> [exec] [ERROR]
> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
> Maven with the -e switch.
> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
> debug logging.
> [exec] [ERROR]
> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> solutions, please read the following articles:
> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https:/
> /na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%
> 2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=
> 02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=
> cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec
> returned: 1
>
> Total time: 52 seconds
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com<mailto:
> aharui@adobe.com>> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure
> out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra
> or going on hipchat to find out.
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%
> 7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%
> 2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>
> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There
> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that
> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release
> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete
> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy
> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a
> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>
> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete
> tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still
> have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between
> machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of
> steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>
> Good luck,
> -Alex
>
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com<mailto:b
> igosmallm@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
> Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com<mailto:b
> igosmallm@gmail.com>>
> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>
>
> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few
> commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those
> failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I am getting this error:
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local
> modifications :
> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>
> The pom.xml has only one change:
>
> <scm>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.
> git</connection>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> <tag>HEAD</tag>
> </scm>
>
> changed to:
>
> <scm>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.
> git</connection>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
> <tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
> </scm>
>
> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the
> release process?
> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%
> 2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=
> 095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
> com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%
> 23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32
> f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%
> 2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> <ma...@adobe.com.invalid>> wrote:
> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to
> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether
> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few
> weeks away.
>
> So, go for it!
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> on
> behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com>
> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new
> [Last Call]
> thread or is this it?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there
> will be
> > things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if
> we can
> > make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone
> can follow
> > these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Om,
> >
> > I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >
> > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> > 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<h
> ttps://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%
> 2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> > 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> > fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>:
> >
> > > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine
> with VSCode.
> > > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> process?
> > >
> > > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts +
> Jewel theme
> > > integration in the meantime.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up
> a bunch of
> > other
> > > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> again to
> > verify.
> > > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> release.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui"
> <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I
> don't want to
> > take
> > > > the time to
> > > > > find out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try this one:
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com<
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%
> 2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%
> 2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> > 5e31%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqN
> aTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > > >
> > > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that
> builds both a
> > > js-swf
> > > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the
> js-only
> > package.
> > > The
> > > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package
> but uses a
> > > different
> > > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a
> while.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look at it now.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.
> com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
> mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%
> 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.
> outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
> HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.
> com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
> mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%
> 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.
> outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=
> HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Om, what Ant target were you running that was referencing 0.9.5?
I'm done for tonight, will check in the morning...
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/4/18, 10:55 PM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
Hi Om,
I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for the gpg-agent problem and anything else?
Thanks,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Om,
I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
Thanks,
Om
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <om...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than I already have.
I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this point.
Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki? https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=eTDZ73oTkid7eiaEv%2BwfL4HXN0Dcu3XUB%2FPCW%2FLp3a8%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <om...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
To: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
<snip>
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
[exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
[exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get input
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
[exec] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
[exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=ASlA1x%2BjoerK4kuVRaUHoxvq1pYnZAtYmCEBfaTAXuw%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
BUILD FAILED
C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
Total time: 52 seconds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Om,
FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or going on hipchat to find out.
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=JceKXNlPUW5wJ5x5QcbE0uiBn%2FBdCu2%2BGBkPsUjA8ek%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
Good luck,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am getting this error:
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local modifications :
[exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
The pom.xml has only one change:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>HEAD</tag>
</scm>
changed to:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
</scm>
Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release process?
It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5015911c5a8244a05fa408d5b24cc1cb%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610965190205448&sdata=095BZ%2BCHqz2LIEjfcuMJ3SQ0%2FOnQLsZS7h0YVFTJXsQ%3D&reserved=0<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>> wrote:
Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few weeks away.
So, go for it!
-Alex
On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Om,
I will look into it Sunday evening. The 0.9.2 release was created on my Windows machine. 0.9.1 was done on the Mac.
Do you have a list of issues you ran into and solutions? Like for the gpg-agent problem and anything else?
Thanks,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 2:00 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Om,
I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things back to a good state, I can try with my Mac.
Thanks,
Om
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <om...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than I already have.
I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this point.
Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki? https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <om...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
To: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
<snip>
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
[exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
[exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get input
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
[exec] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
[exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
BUILD FAILED
C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
Total time: 52 seconds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Om,
FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or going on hipchat to find out.
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
Good luck,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am getting this error:
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local modifications :
[exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
The pom.xml has only one change:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>HEAD</tag>
</scm>
changed to:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
</scm>
Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release process?
It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/pom.xml#L49<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>> wrote:
Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few weeks away.
So, go for it!
-Alex
On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, May 4, 2018, 1:55 PM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
>
>
> I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important to
> get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will
> try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where
> they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
>
>
>
I reverted my changes and deleted the staging maven artifact.
I have not been able to figure out where the 0.9.5 is coming from.
And this might be a Mac vs Windows thing. If you can revert things back to
a good state, I can try with my Mac.
Thanks,
Om
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Cc: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
> I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i am
> ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than I
> already have.
>
> I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
> script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this
> point.
>
>
>
> Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>
>
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> *To: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> *Cc: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second
> step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash
> on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
>
>
>
> <snip>
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
>
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
>
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get
> input
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts)
> on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
> debug logging.
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>
> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>
> [exec] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>
> [exec] [INFO]
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent ....................
> FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...........
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...............
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger ..................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer .................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks ....................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin .................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
> [exec] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
>
> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>
> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
>
> [exec] [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli)
> on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1'
> -> [Help 1]
>
> [exec] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
> Maven with the -e switch.
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
> logging.
>
> [exec] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> solutions, please read the following articles:
>
> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1]
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>
> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>
>
>
> BUILD FAILED
>
> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
>
>
>
> Total time: 52 seconds
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Om,
>
>
>
> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out
> where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or
> going on hipchat to find out.
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There
> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that
> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release
> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete
> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy
> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a
> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>
>
>
> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags
> and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have
> hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so
> any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to
> handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Subject: *Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> To: <de...@royale.apache.org>
>
>
>
> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits
> on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed
> runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am getting this error:
>
>
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on
> project royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you
> have local modifications :
>
> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>
>
>
> The pom.xml has only one change:
>
>
>
> <scm>
>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:
> apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>
> <tag>*HEAD*</tag>
>
> </scm>
>
>
>
> changed to:
>
>
>
> <scm>
>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:
> apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>
> <tag>*release/0.9.3*</tag>
>
> </scm>
>
>
>
> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release
> process?
>
> It does indeed have HEAD currently:
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/pom.xml#L49
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to
> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether
> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few
> weeks away.
>
> So, go for it!
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last
> Call]
> thread or is this it?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will
> be
> > things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we
> can
> > make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can
> follow
> > these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Om,
> >
> > I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >
> > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> > 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>
> %
> > 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> > fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with
> VSCode.
> > > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> process?
> > >
> > > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel
> theme
> > > integration in the meantime.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a
> bunch of
> > other
> > > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> again to
> > verify.
> > > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> release.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't
> want to
> > take
> > > > the time to
> > > > > find out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try this one:
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>
> %
> > > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> > 5e31%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > > >
> > > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds
> both a
> > > js-swf
> > > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> > package.
> > > The
> > > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but
> uses a
> > > different
> > > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look at it now.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> >
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Om,
I won’t have much time until Sunday late. IMO, it is more important to get the scripts to work so people besides me can make a release. I will try to take a look on Sunday and try to restore the repos back to where they should be. Or are there other problems you have not solved?
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 12:04 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Cc: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i am ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than I already have.
I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this point.
Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki? https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce3e881894d9f4d85a11308d5b1f1e0b9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636610574790159284&sdata=pbpunrcMYrHJaOdF75nJ7SqMb%2B10Tr%2BRwLaNQiwTF3I%3D&reserved=0>
Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>" <om...@gmail.com>> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
To: "dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>" <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
<snip>
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
[exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
[exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get input
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
[exec] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
[exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
BUILD FAILED
C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
Total time: 52 seconds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Om,
FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or going on hipchat to find out.
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
Good luck,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am getting this error:
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local modifications :
[exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
The pom.xml has only one change:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>HEAD</tag>
</scm>
changed to:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
</scm>
Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release process?
It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/pom.xml#L49<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>> wrote:
Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few weeks away.
So, go for it!
-Alex
On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I have tried to get this working for the last several days. I think i am
ready to give up on this. I don't want to mess things up any more than I
already have.
I tried to clean up things, but for some reason the release candidate
script tries to build 0.9.5 now :-o I am not sure how to fix that at this
point.
Alex, you may have to do the 0.9.3 release. Sorry for the trouble.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 1:20 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki?
> https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
>
>
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *"omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
> *To: *"dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
> *Cc: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Subject: *Re: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
> The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second
> step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash
> on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
>
>
>
> <snip>
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
>
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
>
> [exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get
> input
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
> (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 ->
> [Help 1]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
> re-run Maven with the -e switch.
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
> debug logging.
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
> possible solutions, please read the following articles:
>
> [exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>
> [exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
>
> [exec] [INFO]
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent ....................
> FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...........
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...............
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger ..................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer .................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks ....................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin .................
> SKIPPED
>
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
>
> [exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
>
> [exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
>
> [exec] [INFO] ------------------------------
> ------------------------------------------
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project
> royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
>
> [exec] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run
> Maven with the -e switch.
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
> logging.
>
> [exec] [ERROR]
>
> [exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> solutions, please read the following articles:
>
> [exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
>
> [exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
>
>
>
> BUILD FAILED
>
> C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
>
>
>
> Total time: 52 seconds
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Om,
>
>
>
> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out
> where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or
> going on hipchat to find out.
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There
> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that
> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release
> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete
> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy
> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a
> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>
>
>
> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags
> and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have
> hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so
> any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to
> handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Subject: *Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> To: <de...@royale.apache.org>
>
>
>
> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits
> on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed
> runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am getting this error:
>
>
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local
> modifications :
>
> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>
>
>
> The pom.xml has only one change:
>
>
>
> <scm>
>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>
> <tag>*HEAD*</tag>
>
> </scm>
>
>
>
> changed to:
>
>
>
> <scm>
>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>
> <tag>*release/0.9.3*</tag>
>
> </scm>
>
>
>
> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release
> process?
>
> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://github.com/
> apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/pom.xml#L49
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to
> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether
> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few
> weeks away.
>
> So, go for it!
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last
> Call]
> thread or is this it?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will
> be
> > things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we
> can
> > make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can
> follow
> > these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Om,
> >
> > I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >
> > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> > 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>
> %
> > 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> > fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with
> VSCode.
> > > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> process?
> > >
> > > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel
> theme
> > > integration in the meantime.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a
> bunch of
> > other
> > > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> again to
> > verify.
> > > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> release.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't
> want to
> > take
> > > > the time to
> > > > > find out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try this one:
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>
> %
> > > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> > 5e31%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > > >
> > > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds
> both a
> > > js-swf
> > > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> > package.
> > > The
> > > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but
> uses a
> > > different
> > > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look at it now.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Did you try the instructions about gpg and ssh-agent in the wiki? https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
Unfortunately, I have to shut down for tonight. Will check tomorrow.
-Alex
From: "omuppi1@gmail.com" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM
To: "dev@royale.apache.org" <de...@royale.apache.org>
Cc: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
<snip>
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
[exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
[exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get input
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts) on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
[exec] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent .................... FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ........... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................ SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ............... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks .................... SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin ................. SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
[exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
[exec] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli) on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1' -> [Help 1]
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [ERROR] [Help 1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.apache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FMAVEN%2FMojoExecutionException&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=cbx9iZB4DhceXjAMqUl0%2BHS54IYjYMfUOFsjyS8yEC0%3D&reserved=0>
[exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
BUILD FAILED
C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
Total time: 52 seconds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>> wrote:
Hi Om,
FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or going on hipchat to find out.
http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Fdev%2Finfra-contact&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C91ad0a4299e5458fa6cc08d5ae7280bc%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606729202066029&sdata=1rPJsabc6X0FlKBKhmug5McD%2FejGtPMeXpofAVj%2BknE%3D&reserved=0>
The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
Good luck,
-Alex
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
To: Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>>
Subject: Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>
Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
To: <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed runs have caused this inconsistent state?
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am getting this error:
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local modifications :
[exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
The pom.xml has only one change:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>HEAD</tag>
</scm>
changed to:
<scm>
<connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
<developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</developerConnection>
<url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
<tag>release/0.9.3</tag>
</scm>
Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release process?
It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/pom.xml#L49<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>> wrote:
Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few weeks away.
So, go for it!
-Alex
On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <om...@gmail.com> on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
The first step went through fine. I am getting this error on the second
step. I am getting the same error on cmd prompt, git bash and ubuntu bash
on my windows machine. I am pretty sure I am missing something.
<snip>
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign
(sign-release-artifacts) @ royale-compiler-parent ---
[exec] [INFO] gpg: gpg-agent is not available in this session
[exec] [INFO] gpg: Sorry, no terminal at all requested - can't get
input
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 20.027 s
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Final Memory: 35M/666M
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.6:sign (sign-release-artifacts)
on project royale-compiler-parent: Exit code: 2 -> [Help 1]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors,
re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full
debug logging.
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR]
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and
possible solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [INFO] [ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
[exec] [INFO] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
[exec] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Reactor Summary:
[exec] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent ....................
FAILURE [ 25.700 s]
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...........
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils ................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...............
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger ..................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer .................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks ....................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin .................
SKIPPED
[exec] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [INFO] Total time: 26.596 s
[exec] [INFO] Finished at: 2018-04-30T01:05:47-07:00
[exec] [INFO] Final Memory: 21M/377M
[exec] [INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:prepare (default-cli)
on project royale-compiler-parent: Maven execution failed, exit code: '1'
-> [Help 1]
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven
with the -e switch.
[exec] [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
logging.
[exec] [ERROR]
[exec] [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
solutions, please read the following articles:
[exec] [ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
[exec] Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS: -Dfile.encoding=UTF8
BUILD FAILED
C:\p\os\flexroot\royale\release\releasecandidate.xml:544: exec returned: 1
Total time: 52 seconds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
>
>
> FWIW, I verified you are subscribed to dev@royale. I can’t figure out
> where your emails are going. I would recommend emailing users@infra or
> going on hipchat to find out.
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact
>
>
>
> The script does try to make some local changes and commit them. There
> should be other ant targets you can try to use to skip over the parts that
> have worked successfully. All I see on commits@ is the making of release
> branches for royale-compiler and royale-typedefs. You may need to delete
> the local release branch for royale-asjs and delete the repo working copy
> then start from the “maven.branch.framework” target. That should pull a
> fresh clone of royale-asjs and try to make a release branch in it.
>
>
>
> As you get further, when things don’t go right, I’ve had to delete tags
> and revert commits before restarting Ant at certain targets. I still have
> hope we can make the Ant script tolerant of differences between machines so
> any PMC member can use it to cut a release. There are a lot of steps to
> handle both Maven and Ant and NPM.
>
>
>
> Good luck,
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
> *From: *OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Sunday, April 29, 2018 at 5:40 PM
> *To: *Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> *Subject: *Fwd: 0.9.3 Release
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 11:14 PM
> Subject: Re: 0.9.3 Release
> To: <de...@royale.apache.org>
>
>
>
> Ah I just realized that the releasecandidate ant script made a few commits
> on my behalf. I had a few errors that I had to fix. Could those failed
> runs have caused this inconsistent state?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am getting this error:
>
>
>
> [exec] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:
> maven-release-plugin:2.5.3:branch (default-cli) on project
> royale-framework-parent: Cannot prepare the release because you have local
> modifications :
>
> [exec] [ERROR] [pom.xml:modified]
>
>
>
> The pom.xml has only one change:
>
>
>
> <scm>
>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>
> <tag>*HEAD*</tag>
>
> </scm>
>
>
>
> changed to:
>
>
>
> <scm>
>
> <connection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</connection>
>
> <developerConnection>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-
> asjs.git</developerConnection>
>
> <url>scm:git:git@github.com:apache/royale-asjs.git</url>
>
> <tag>*release/0.9.3*</tag>
>
> </scm>
>
>
>
> Should I first change HEAD to release/0.9.3 before starting the release
> process?
>
> It does indeed have HEAD currently: https://github.com/
> apache/royale-asjs/blob/develop/pom.xml#L49
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fblob%2Fdevelop%2Fpom.xml%23L49&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=cBMQ2644E%2BtmH6vBfiJzZ2DxZ7R%2FwWjs3Dd%2FjwEujjE%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Om
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to
> make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether
> something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few
> weeks away.
>
> So, go for it!
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last
> Call]
> thread or is this it?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will
> be
> > things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we
> can
> > make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can
> follow
> > these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Om,
> >
> > I believe this is some starting point [1]
> >
> > [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> > 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=UXcD0j5Tbbz3ylbUtG%2F8MEJQuHnallIgfT4XZRAEs04%3D&reserved=0>
> %
> > 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> > fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with
> VSCode.
> > > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release
> process?
> > >
> > > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel
> theme
> > > integration in the meantime.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a
> bunch of
> > other
> > > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it
> again to
> > verify.
> > > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the
> release.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> > bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't
> want to
> > take
> > > > the time to
> > > > > find out.
> > > > >
> > > > > Try this one:
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217160033&sdata=%2BukHQUpC9UhebH31H7smW1aYwbrNShzZe5o2dFIKPuc%3D&reserved=0>
> %
> > > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> > 5e31%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > > >
> > > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds
> both a
> > > js-swf
> > > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> > package.
> > > The
> > > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but
> uses a
> > > different
> > > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > > >
> > > > I will take a look at it now.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F2Fwww.patreon.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=mcG08QY6mvbIwDGLtvSqGITe86X0eYlSBmyz1YbzKcI%3D&reserved=0>
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40adobe.com&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C83d9deb2f89248a812db08d5ae32f0f7%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636606456217170041&sdata=HNRFfSIEzF4yHbVLFdkNF%2BqFbz74AhzOkFuI0wZ4uWI%3D&reserved=0>
> %7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> > PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Royale isn't really going to do [Last Call] like Flex did. We hope to make the release process quick enough that it doesn't really matter whether something gets into the release or not. The next release should be a few weeks away.
So, go for it!
-Alex
On 4/27/18, 10:51 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Okay, I have started looking into this. Should I start a new [Last Call]
thread or is this it?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be
> things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can
> make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow
> these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%
> 2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFv
> fmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
>
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to
> take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa00
> 5e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only
> package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=
> PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Yep, that's what we have for you to work with. I expect there will be things missing or needing improvement, but it will be awesome if we can make this process work for you. Then we can hope that anyone can follow these instructions and use the scripts to generate a release.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/25/18, 12:19 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Om,
I believe this is some starting point [1]
[1] https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notes&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=M6AXRZTAjFbWerTBnC7Mnk4zS2BkFvfmdHLajtuOLAw%3D&reserved=0
Piotr
2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
>
> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> integration in the meantime.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of other
> > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to verify.
> > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take
> > the time to
> > > find out.
> > >
> > > Try this one:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%
> > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa005e31%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> > What is this package supposed to install?
> >
> > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> js-swf
> > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only package.
> The
> > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> different
> > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> >
> > I will take a look at it now.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2fd9fa97db624afeb36808d5aa7cd94a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636602375606683856&sdata=PiDsu1q2Fh6Ef9SpxhN%2FVTogKtUMnLVxGBbi3SGjg%2Fo%3D&reserved=0>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:19 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Om,
>
> I believe this is some starting point [1]
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
>
> Piotr
>
That link looks great. Thanks!
>
> 2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> > Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
> >
> > I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> > integration in the meantime.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of
> other
> > > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to
> verify.
> > > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> > >
> > > HTH,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> > <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take
> > > the time to
> > > > find out.
> > > >
> > > > Try this one:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%
> > > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa005e31%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > > What is this package supposed to install?
> > >
> > > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> > js-swf
> > > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only package.
> > The
> > > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> > different
> > > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it now.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Om,
I believe this is some starting point [1]
[1] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
Piotr
2018-04-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>:
> Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
> Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
>
> I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
> integration in the meantime.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of other
> > issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to verify.
> > If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take
> > the time to
> > > find out.
> > >
> > > Try this one:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%
> > 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> > 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> > data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa005e31%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> > IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
> >
> >
> > What is this package supposed to install?
> >
> > That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a
> js-swf
> > package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only package.
> The
> > royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a
> different
> > set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
> >
> > I will take a look at it now.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Okay that works. 0.9.3 gets installed and it works fine with VSCode.
Can you point me to where I need to start with the release process?
I am going to try and get some work done on my ECharts + Jewel theme
integration in the meantime.
Thanks,
Om
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of other
> issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to verify.
> If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take
> the time to
> > find out.
> >
> > Try this one:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%
> 3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%
> 2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&
> data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa005e31%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601840922580714&sdata=
> IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
>
>
> What is this package supposed to install?
>
> That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a js-swf
> package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only package. The
> royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a different
> set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
>
> I will take a look at it now.
>
> -Alex
>
>
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I think I have this working correctly. I also fixed up a bunch of other issues. Wait until the CI server catches up and try it again to verify. If it does, then I think you are all clear to start the release.
HTH,
-Alex
On 4/24/18, 9:28 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to
> find out.
>
> Try this one:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5b1248637b664c17102a08d5aa005e31%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601840922580714&sdata=IqE9VZ5HZXrap4Bi4XV1CUY8PR8YqNaTPzcjHH%2BoSmY%3D&reserved=0
What is this package supposed to install?
That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a js-swf package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only package. The royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a different set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
I will take a look at it now.
-Alex
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to
> find out.
>
> Try this one:
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
What is this package supposed to install?
That link is from the main royale-asjs build that builds both a js-swf package and a js (only) package. The link is for the js-only package. The royale-asjs-jsonly build also builds a js-only package but uses a different set of Ant tasks and I think it has been wrong for a while.
I will take a look at it now.
-Alex
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 12:58 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to
> find out.
>
> Try this one:
> http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
What is this package supposed to install?
>
> If that works, that will confirm the problem, which is that the main
> script doesn't copy the right package.json when running without the
> AIR_HOME variable.
Which main script?
If you have time to fix it great, otherwise I will look into it tomorrow.
>
> HTH,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/24/18, 12:03 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Still seeing the same issue.
> Screenshot here:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FjBxIZs.jpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955103090&sdata=xvG5YJLAJ87Yso%2FotMOBJpcEOii6JF199vCYKFy4UgA%3D&reserved=0
>
> Command used to install:
> npm install
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs_jsonly%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955103090&sdata=R6fnrKpWnimxbCgwrcdqgZkpDmP34dskd62SHtUf%2Bl4%3D&reserved=0
> -g
>
> Expected:
> Install js-only Royale SDK, i.e. @apache-royale\royale-js
>
> Actual:
> @apache-royale\royale-js-swf gets installed
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > If you are still having problems, please be more specific about what
> you
> > mean by "build" and what js-swf artifacts are being pulled down.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/23/18, 9:29 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> > Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > a. The js-only build was pulling down the js-swf artifacts
> > b. It was not recognized by Visual Studio as a valid sdk
> >
> > I'm guessing these two are related.
> >
> > This was right after Carlos published his new List component.
> >
> > Will give it a shot soon and let you know.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Alex Harui
> <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Om,
> > >
> > > AIUI, your issue is that the nightly JS-Only build wasn't a
> valid
> > Flex
> > > SDK. I just tried the nightly, and FB said it was a valid
> SDK. I
> > guess I
> > > will try bringing it down via NPM next. When was the last
> time you
> > tried
> > > this?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/23/18, 8:09 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> > > Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of
> bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > Any updates on the build issues?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Om
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs
> additional
> > 3' of
> > > build,
> > > > and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't
> need
> > to
> > > rebuild it
> > > > (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file
> bundled in a
> > > .SWC. And
> > > > this is more for people like us that are building
> royale. Folks
> > > working
> > > > with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled,
> so
> > it's just
> > > for us
> > > > to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I
> > could need
> > > to
> > > > build themes as I make changes in jewel and update
> styles, but
> > you
> > > or Alex,
> > > > build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC
> projects
> > > (HTML,
> > > > Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
> > > >
> > > > But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we
> could
> > > decide later
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > If we don't separate themes from the build for this
> release,
> > it
> > > isn't
> > > > that
> > > > > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will
> > impact the
> > > > > instructions on how to build "everything" and
> > releasecandidate.xml
> > > script
> > > > > will need updating as well to include the new Maven
> profile
> > > otherwise
> > > > > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> > > > >
> > > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> > > > >
> > > > > " If we do this, we should let people know that
> they must
> > > first build
> > > > > themes
> > > > > and then build royale-asjs."
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact
> > Emulation.
> > > I did
> > > > > understand it wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I
> think
> > Jewel
> > > should
> > > > > be
> > > > > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may
> use
> > Jewel
> > > as the
> > > > > default
> > > > > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel
> module in
> > general
> > > may
> > > > > affect
> > > > > > build,
> > > > > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge
> all ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Piotr
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > > > > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> > > > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > > > > >:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So much for releasing early each month
> ;-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > yep! :)))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname
> branches
> > into
> > > the
> > > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into
> develop
> > and
> > > cutting a
> > > > > > release. We
> > > > > > > > will likely continue creating new
> emulation
> > > components in
> > > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > > since
> > > > > > > > we are inviting new contributors so
> continuing
> > work
> > > in
> > > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly
> builds.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The emulation components are far from
> > finished, but
> > > IMO, we
> > > > > should
> > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact
> on
> > other
> > > component
> > > > > sets.
> > > > > > What do
> > > > > > > > others think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take
> a look
> > at
> > > MXRoyale,
> > > > > but I
> > > > > > think
> > > > > > > is a good time
> > > > > > > to see what will be merged
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but
> we
> > might
> > > want to
> > > > > create a
> > > > > > common
> > > > > > > > base class for the new
> className/classList
> > code in
> > > Jewel.
> > > > > Or it
> > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some
> days of
> > trying
> > > themes
> > > > > stuff,
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > > > > folder for building directly, and we could
> split
> > it
> > > the same
> > > > > way as
> > > > > > > "examples" (that are not build directly
> when we
> > build
> > > > > royale-asjs).
> > > > > > > If we do this, we should let people know
> that
> > they
> > > must first
> > > > > build
> > > > > > themes
> > > > > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a
> suggestion.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class,
> I'm for
> > do
> > > it, but I
> > > > > think
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > should not stop these release, since is
> something
> > > internal
> > > > > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm
> have many
> > > things on my
> > > > > plate
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting
> this done.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and
> cutting
> > a 0.9.3
> > > > release
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carlos
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove
> from
> > 0.9.3?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955103090&sdata=zl5OeYLqhEwwGdHh7uf%2FdJd6d4vlNr79GL%2BBzWWIGJo%3D&reserved=0
> .
> > protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > >
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%
> > > > > 40adobe.com%
> > > > > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> > 54c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> > > 178de
> > > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > > > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955113098&sdata=6qY6wTSF8hkvqdLYT7iLpVziStBRQb5B4kKEdlWJkDY%3D&reserved=0
> .
> > protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.
> > protec&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C07dad7af9dba4d826c1508d5a99b
> > f8c9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636601409829171244&sdata=9kZ0%2Fvsv95ies7jWVpDtaqdfqAWhaNZCN
> > Zo63VUDMaY%3D&reserved=0
> > > tion.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%
> > 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> > 54c3%
> > > > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&
> > reserved=0
> > > > > > <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955113098&sdata=6qY6wTSF8hkvqdLYT7iLpVziStBRQb5B4kKEdlWJkDY%3D&reserved=0
> .
> > protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%
> > 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> > 54c3%
> > > > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&
> > reserved=0>
> > > *
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955113098&sdata=6qY6wTSF8hkvqdLYT7iLpVziStBRQb5B4kKEdlWJkDY%3D&reserved=0
> .
> > protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > > >
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> > > 566&sdata=R%
> > > > >
> 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com
> %2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com
> %7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > > >
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> > > 566&sdata=R%
> > > > >
> 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>
> > *
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> > > 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
> > > com%7Cf5aa32157d6847eeabbc08d5a990be25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
> > > ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601361554436566&sdata=4Ytnvqn2qb9
> > > Rl56E5iQ%2FnsQJr9Yq3ZT%2BVJNoHqLmK1Y%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I think that's been broken forever. But I don't want to take the time to find out.
Try this one: http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
If that works, that will confirm the problem, which is that the main script doesn't copy the right package.json when running without the AIR_HOME variable. If you have time to fix it great, otherwise I will look into it tomorrow.
HTH,
-Alex
On 4/24/18, 12:03 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
Still seeing the same issue.
Screenshot here: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsnag.gy%2FjBxIZs.jpg&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955103090&sdata=xvG5YJLAJ87Yso%2FotMOBJpcEOii6JF199vCYKFy4UgA%3D&reserved=0
Command used to install:
npm install
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com%3A8080%2Fjob%2Froyale-asjs_jsonly%2FlastSuccessfulBuild%2Fartifact%2Fout%2Fapache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955103090&sdata=R6fnrKpWnimxbCgwrcdqgZkpDmP34dskd62SHtUf%2Bl4%3D&reserved=0
-g
Expected:
Install js-only Royale SDK, i.e. @apache-royale\royale-js
Actual:
@apache-royale\royale-js-swf gets installed
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> If you are still having problems, please be more specific about what you
> mean by "build" and what js-swf artifacts are being pulled down.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/23/18, 9:29 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> a. The js-only build was pulling down the js-swf artifacts
> b. It was not recognized by Visual Studio as a valid sdk
>
> I'm guessing these two are related.
>
> This was right after Carlos published his new List component.
>
> Will give it a shot soon and let you know.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Om,
> >
> > AIUI, your issue is that the nightly JS-Only build wasn't a valid
> Flex
> > SDK. I just tried the nightly, and FB said it was a valid SDK. I
> guess I
> > will try bringing it down via NPM next. When was the last time you
> tried
> > this?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/23/18, 8:09 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> > Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > Any updates on the build issues?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional
> 3' of
> > build,
> > > and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need
> to
> > rebuild it
> > > (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a
> > .SWC. And
> > > this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks
> > working
> > > with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so
> it's just
> > for us
> > > to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I
> could need
> > to
> > > build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but
> you
> > or Alex,
> > > build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects
> > (HTML,
> > > Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
> > >
> > > But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could
> > decide later
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > If we don't separate themes from the build for this release,
> it
> > isn't
> > > that
> > > > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will
> impact the
> > > > instructions on how to build "everything" and
> releasecandidate.xml
> > script
> > > > will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile
> > otherwise
> > > > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> > > >
> > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Alex,
> > > >
> > > > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> > > >
> > > > " If we do this, we should let people know that they must
> > first build
> > > > themes
> > > > and then build royale-asjs."
> > > >
> > > > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact
> Emulation.
> > I did
> > > > understand it wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think
> Jewel
> > should
> > > > be
> > > > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use
> Jewel
> > as the
> > > > default
> > > > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in
> general
> > may
> > > > affect
> > > > > build,
> > > > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > > > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> > > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > yep! :)))
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches
> into
> > the
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop
> and
> > cutting a
> > > > > release. We
> > > > > > > will likely continue creating new emulation
> > components in
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > since
> > > > > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing
> work
> > in
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The emulation components are far from
> finished, but
> > IMO, we
> > > > should
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on
> other
> > component
> > > > sets.
> > > > > What do
> > > > > > > others think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look
> at
> > MXRoyale,
> > > > but I
> > > > > think
> > > > > > is a good time
> > > > > > to see what will be merged
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we
> might
> > want to
> > > > create a
> > > > > common
> > > > > > > base class for the new className/classList
> code in
> > Jewel.
> > > > Or it
> > > > > could
> > > > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of
> trying
> > themes
> > > > stuff,
> > > > > we
> > > > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > > > folder for building directly, and we could split
> it
> > the same
> > > > way as
> > > > > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we
> build
> > > > royale-asjs).
> > > > > > If we do this, we should let people know that
> they
> > must first
> > > > build
> > > > > themes
> > > > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for
> do
> > it, but I
> > > > think
> > > > > this
> > > > > > should not stop these release, since is something
> > internal
> > > > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many
> > things on my
> > > > plate
> > > > > and
> > > > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting
> a 0.9.3
> > > release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carlos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from
> 0.9.3?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955103090&sdata=zl5OeYLqhEwwGdHh7uf%2FdJd6d4vlNr79GL%2BBzWWIGJo%3D&reserved=0.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%
> > > > 40adobe.com%
> > > > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> 54c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> > 178de
> > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955113098&sdata=6qY6wTSF8hkvqdLYT7iLpVziStBRQb5B4kKEdlWJkDY%3D&reserved=0.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.
> protec&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dad7af9dba4d826c1508d5a99b
> f8c9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601409829171244&sdata=9kZ0%2Fvsv95ies7jWVpDtaqdfqAWhaNZCN
> Zo63VUDMaY%3D&reserved=0
> > tion.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%
> 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> 54c3%
> > > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&
> reserved=0
> > > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955113098&sdata=6qY6wTSF8hkvqdLYT7iLpVziStBRQb5B4kKEdlWJkDY%3D&reserved=0.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%
> 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> 54c3%
> > > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&
> reserved=0>
> > *
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C2f13fa6ac1a24417593c08d5a9b16fe5%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601501955113098&sdata=6qY6wTSF8hkvqdLYT7iLpVziStBRQb5B4kKEdlWJkDY%3D&reserved=0.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> > 566&sdata=R%
> > > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> > 566&sdata=R%
> > > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>
> *
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> > 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
> > com%7Cf5aa32157d6847eeabbc08d5a990be25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
> > ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601361554436566&sdata=4Ytnvqn2qb9
> > Rl56E5iQ%2FnsQJr9Yq3ZT%2BVJNoHqLmK1Y%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Still seeing the same issue.
Screenshot here: https://snag.gy/jBxIZs.jpg
Command used to install:
npm install
http://apacheroyaleci.westus2.cloudapp.azure.com:8080/job/royale-asjs_jsonly/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/out/apache-royale-0.9.3-bin-js.tar.gz
-g
Expected:
Install js-only Royale SDK, i.e. @apache-royale\royale-js
Actual:
@apache-royale\royale-js-swf gets installed
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> If you are still having problems, please be more specific about what you
> mean by "build" and what js-swf artifacts are being pulled down.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/23/18, 9:29 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> a. The js-only build was pulling down the js-swf artifacts
> b. It was not recognized by Visual Studio as a valid sdk
>
> I'm guessing these two are related.
>
> This was right after Carlos published his new List component.
>
> Will give it a shot soon and let you know.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Om,
> >
> > AIUI, your issue is that the nightly JS-Only build wasn't a valid
> Flex
> > SDK. I just tried the nightly, and FB said it was a valid SDK. I
> guess I
> > will try bringing it down via NPM next. When was the last time you
> tried
> > this?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/23/18, 8:09 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> > Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > Any updates on the build issues?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional
> 3' of
> > build,
> > > and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need
> to
> > rebuild it
> > > (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a
> > .SWC. And
> > > this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks
> > working
> > > with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so
> it's just
> > for us
> > > to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I
> could need
> > to
> > > build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but
> you
> > or Alex,
> > > build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects
> > (HTML,
> > > Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
> > >
> > > But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could
> > decide later
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > If we don't separate themes from the build for this release,
> it
> > isn't
> > > that
> > > > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will
> impact the
> > > > instructions on how to build "everything" and
> releasecandidate.xml
> > script
> > > > will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile
> > otherwise
> > > > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> > > >
> > > > My 2 cents,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Alex,
> > > >
> > > > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> > > >
> > > > " If we do this, we should let people know that they must
> > first build
> > > > themes
> > > > and then build royale-asjs."
> > > >
> > > > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact
> Emulation.
> > I did
> > > > understand it wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > > >
> > > > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think
> Jewel
> > should
> > > > be
> > > > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use
> Jewel
> > as the
> > > > default
> > > > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in
> general
> > may
> > > > affect
> > > > > build,
> > > > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > > > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> > > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > > > >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > yep! :)))
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches
> into
> > the
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop
> and
> > cutting a
> > > > > release. We
> > > > > > > will likely continue creating new emulation
> > components in
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > since
> > > > > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing
> work
> > in
> > > > MXRoyale
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The emulation components are far from
> finished, but
> > IMO, we
> > > > should
> > > > > > release
> > > > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on
> other
> > component
> > > > sets.
> > > > > What do
> > > > > > > others think?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look
> at
> > MXRoyale,
> > > > but I
> > > > > think
> > > > > > is a good time
> > > > > > to see what will be merged
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we
> might
> > want to
> > > > create a
> > > > > common
> > > > > > > base class for the new className/classList
> code in
> > Jewel.
> > > > Or it
> > > > > could
> > > > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of
> trying
> > themes
> > > > stuff,
> > > > > we
> > > > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > > > folder for building directly, and we could split
> it
> > the same
> > > > way as
> > > > > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we
> build
> > > > royale-asjs).
> > > > > > If we do this, we should let people know that
> they
> > must first
> > > > build
> > > > > themes
> > > > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for
> do
> > it, but I
> > > > think
> > > > > this
> > > > > > should not stop these release, since is something
> > internal
> > > > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many
> > things on my
> > > > plate
> > > > > and
> > > > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting
> a 0.9.3
> > > release
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carlos
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from
> 0.9.3?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > > https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%
> > > > 40adobe.com%
> > > > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> 54c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> > 178de
> > > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > > >
> > > > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.
> protec&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dad7af9dba4d826c1508d5a99b
> f8c9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636601409829171244&sdata=9kZ0%2Fvsv95ies7jWVpDtaqdfqAWhaNZCN
> Zo63VUDMaY%3D&reserved=0
> > tion.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%
> 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> 54c3%
> > > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&
> reserved=0
> > > > > <https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%
> 2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b4
> 54c3%
> > > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&
> reserved=0>
> > *
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.
> protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> > 566&sdata=R%
> > > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> > 566&sdata=R%
> > > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>
> *
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> > 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
> > com%7Cf5aa32157d6847eeabbc08d5a990be25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
> > ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601361554436566&sdata=4Ytnvqn2qb9
> > Rl56E5iQ%2FnsQJr9Yq3ZT%2BVJNoHqLmK1Y%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
If you are still having problems, please be more specific about what you mean by "build" and what js-swf artifacts are being pulled down.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/23/18, 9:29 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
a. The js-only build was pulling down the js-swf artifacts
b. It was not recognized by Visual Studio as a valid sdk
I'm guessing these two are related.
This was right after Carlos published his new List component.
Will give it a shot soon and let you know.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> AIUI, your issue is that the nightly JS-Only build wasn't a valid Flex
> SDK. I just tried the nightly, and FB said it was a valid SDK. I guess I
> will try bringing it down via NPM next. When was the last time you tried
> this?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/23/18, 8:09 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Any updates on the build issues?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional 3' of
> build,
> > and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need to
> rebuild it
> > (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a
> .SWC. And
> > this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks
> working
> > with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so it's just
> for us
> > to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I could need
> to
> > build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but you
> or Alex,
> > build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects
> (HTML,
> > Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
> >
> > But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could
> decide later
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it
> isn't
> > that
> > > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the
> > > instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml
> script
> > > will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile
> otherwise
> > > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> > >
> > > " If we do this, we should let people know that they must
> first build
> > > themes
> > > and then build royale-asjs."
> > >
> > > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation.
> I did
> > > understand it wrong.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel
> should
> > > be
> > > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel
> as the
> > > default
> > > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general
> may
> > > affect
> > > > build,
> > > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > yep! :)))
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into
> the
> > > MXRoyale
> > > > branch.
> > > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and
> cutting a
> > > > release. We
> > > > > > will likely continue creating new emulation
> components in
> > > MXRoyale
> > > > since
> > > > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work
> in
> > > MXRoyale
> > > > will
> > > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but
> IMO, we
> > > should
> > > > > release
> > > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other
> component
> > > sets.
> > > > What do
> > > > > > others think?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at
> MXRoyale,
> > > but I
> > > > think
> > > > > is a good time
> > > > > to see what will be merged
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might
> want to
> > > create a
> > > > common
> > > > > > base class for the new className/classList code in
> Jewel.
> > > Or it
> > > > could
> > > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying
> themes
> > > stuff,
> > > > we
> > > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > > folder for building directly, and we could split it
> the same
> > > way as
> > > > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> > > royale-asjs).
> > > > > If we do this, we should let people know that they
> must first
> > > build
> > > > themes
> > > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do
> it, but I
> > > think
> > > > this
> > > > > should not stop these release, since is something
> internal
> > > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many
> things on my
> > > plate
> > > > and
> > > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > > > >
> > > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3
> > release
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> > > 40adobe.com%
> > > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> 178de
> > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fna01.safelinks.protec&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C07dad7af9dba4d826c1508d5a99bf8c9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601409829171244&sdata=9kZ0%2Fvsv95ies7jWVpDtaqdfqAWhaNZCNZo63VUDMaY%3D&reserved=0
> tion.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>
> *
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> 566&sdata=R%
> > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> 566&sdata=R%
> > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
> com%7Cf5aa32157d6847eeabbc08d5a990be25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601361554436566&sdata=4Ytnvqn2qb9
> Rl56E5iQ%2FnsQJr9Yq3ZT%2BVJNoHqLmK1Y%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
a. The js-only build was pulling down the js-swf artifacts
b. It was not recognized by Visual Studio as a valid sdk
I'm guessing these two are related.
This was right after Carlos published his new List component.
Will give it a shot soon and let you know.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> AIUI, your issue is that the nightly JS-Only build wasn't a valid Flex
> SDK. I just tried the nightly, and FB said it was a valid SDK. I guess I
> will try bringing it down via NPM next. When was the last time you tried
> this?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 4/23/18, 8:09 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
> Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Any updates on the build issues?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional 3' of
> build,
> > and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need to
> rebuild it
> > (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a
> .SWC. And
> > this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks
> working
> > with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so it's just
> for us
> > to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I could need
> to
> > build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but you
> or Alex,
> > build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects
> (HTML,
> > Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
> >
> > But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could
> decide later
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it
> isn't
> > that
> > > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the
> > > instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml
> script
> > > will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile
> otherwise
> > > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> > >
> > > My 2 cents,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> > >
> > > " If we do this, we should let people know that they must
> first build
> > > themes
> > > and then build royale-asjs."
> > >
> > > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation.
> I did
> > > understand it wrong.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel
> should
> > > be
> > > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel
> as the
> > > default
> > > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <
> piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general
> may
> > > affect
> > > > build,
> > > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> > <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > yep! :)))
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into
> the
> > > MXRoyale
> > > > branch.
> > > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and
> cutting a
> > > > release. We
> > > > > > will likely continue creating new emulation
> components in
> > > MXRoyale
> > > > since
> > > > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work
> in
> > > MXRoyale
> > > > will
> > > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but
> IMO, we
> > > should
> > > > > release
> > > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other
> component
> > > sets.
> > > > What do
> > > > > > others think?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at
> MXRoyale,
> > > but I
> > > > think
> > > > > is a good time
> > > > > to see what will be merged
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might
> want to
> > > create a
> > > > common
> > > > > > base class for the new className/classList code in
> Jewel.
> > > Or it
> > > > could
> > > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying
> themes
> > > stuff,
> > > > we
> > > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > > folder for building directly, and we could split it
> the same
> > > way as
> > > > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> > > royale-asjs).
> > > > > If we do this, we should let people know that they
> must first
> > > build
> > > > themes
> > > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do
> it, but I
> > > think
> > > > this
> > > > > should not stop these release, since is something
> internal
> > > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many
> things on my
> > > plate
> > > > and
> > > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > > > >
> > > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3
> > release
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > -Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> > > 40adobe.com%
> > > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> 178de
> > > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protec
> tion.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>
> *
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> 566&sdata=R%
> > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527
> 566&sdata=R%
> > > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%
> 2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.
> com%7Cf5aa32157d6847eeabbc08d5a990be25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794a
> ed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601361554436566&sdata=4Ytnvqn2qb9
> Rl56E5iQ%2FnsQJr9Yq3ZT%2BVJNoHqLmK1Y%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Om,
AIUI, your issue is that the nightly JS-Only build wasn't a valid Flex SDK. I just tried the nightly, and FB said it was a valid SDK. I guess I will try bringing it down via NPM next. When was the last time you tried this?
-Alex
On 4/23/18, 8:09 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
Alex,
Any updates on the build issues?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional 3' of build,
> and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need to rebuild it
> (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a .SWC. And
> this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks working
> with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so it's just for us
> to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I could need to
> build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but you or Alex,
> build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects (HTML,
> Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
>
> But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could decide later
>
>
>
> 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it isn't
> that
> > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the
> > instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml script
> > will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile otherwise
> > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> >
> > " If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> > themes
> > and then build royale-asjs."
> >
> > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation. I did
> > understand it wrong.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should
> > be
> > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
> > default
> > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
> > affect
> > > build,
> > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > yep! :)))
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
> > MXRoyale
> > > branch.
> > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> > > release. We
> > > > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
> > MXRoyale
> > > since
> > > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
> > MXRoyale
> > > will
> > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > > >
> > > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
> > should
> > > > release
> > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component
> > sets.
> > > What do
> > > > > others think?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
> > but I
> > > think
> > > > is a good time
> > > > to see what will be merged
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
> > create a
> > > common
> > > > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
> > Or it
> > > could
> > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
> > stuff,
> > > we
> > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
> > way as
> > > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> > royale-asjs).
> > > > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
> > build
> > > themes
> > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
> > think
> > > this
> > > > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
> > plate
> > > and
> > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > > >
> > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3
> release
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> > 40adobe.com%
> > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%
> > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%
> > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cf5aa32157d6847eeabbc08d5a990be25%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636601361554436566&sdata=4Ytnvqn2qb9Rl56E5iQ%2FnsQJr9Yq3ZT%2BVJNoHqLmK1Y%3D&reserved=0
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Alex,
Any updates on the build issues?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional 3' of build,
> and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need to rebuild it
> (think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a .SWC. And
> this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks working
> with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so it's just for us
> to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I could need to
> build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but you or Alex,
> build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects (HTML,
> Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
>
> But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could decide later
>
>
>
> 2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it isn't
> that
> > big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the
> > instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml script
> > will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile otherwise
> > versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > I was considering this part from Carlos:
> >
> > " If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> > themes
> > and then build royale-asjs."
> >
> > It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation. I did
> > understand it wrong.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should
> > be
> > > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
> > default
> > > look for MXRoyale some day.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
> > affect
> > > build,
> > > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui
> <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> > >:
> > > >
> > > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > yep! :)))
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
> > MXRoyale
> > > branch.
> > > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> > > release. We
> > > > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
> > MXRoyale
> > > since
> > > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
> > MXRoyale
> > > will
> > > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > > >
> > > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
> > should
> > > > release
> > > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component
> > sets.
> > > What do
> > > > > others think?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
> > but I
> > > think
> > > > is a good time
> > > > to see what will be merged
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
> > create a
> > > common
> > > > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
> > Or it
> > > could
> > > > > wait until next month.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
> > stuff,
> > > we
> > > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
> > way as
> > > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> > royale-asjs).
> > > > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
> > build
> > > themes
> > > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
> > think
> > > this
> > > > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
> > plate
> > > and
> > > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > > >
> > > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3
> release
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > -Alex
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> > 40adobe.com%
> > > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%
> > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%
> > 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi my main concern is that all theme projects needs additional 3' of build,
and that use to be only first time, since people doesn't need to rebuild it
(think that themes now are just a single .CSS file bundled in a .SWC. And
this is more for people like us that are building royale. Folks working
with the final SDK will have the SWCs already compiled, so it's just for us
to save 3' (and growing) when make "mvn clean install". I could need to
build themes as I make changes in jewel and update styles, but you or Alex,
build only need to build normaly the normal set of SWC projects (HTML,
Basic, NetWork, Binding, Jewel, ...).
But as Alex said this is not critical for release and we could decide later
2018-04-20 18:49 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it isn't that
> big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the
> instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml script
> will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile otherwise
> versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> I was considering this part from Carlos:
>
> " If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> themes
> and then build royale-asjs."
>
> It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation. I did
> understand it wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should
> be
> > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
> default
> > look for MXRoyale some day.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
> affect
> > build,
> > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > yep! :)))
> > >
> > >
> > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
> MXRoyale
> > branch.
> > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> > release. We
> > > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
> MXRoyale
> > since
> > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
> MXRoyale
> > will
> > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > >
> > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
> should
> > > release
> > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component
> sets.
> > What do
> > > > others think?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
> but I
> > think
> > > is a good time
> > > to see what will be merged
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
> create a
> > common
> > > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
> Or it
> > could
> > > > wait until next month.
> > > >
> > >
> > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
> stuff,
> > we
> > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
> way as
> > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> royale-asjs).
> > > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
> build
> > themes
> > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > >
> > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
> think
> > this
> > > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
> plate
> > and
> > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > >
> > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%
> 40adobe.com%
> > 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> > cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> 3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> > DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> > 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> > 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> > Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%
> 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%
> 2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
I merged MXRoyale to develop. It built in Ant and Maven for me. I didn't build examples though.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/20/18, 9:59 AM, "Alex Harui" <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote:
If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it isn't that big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml script will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile otherwise versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Alex,
I was considering this part from Carlos:
" If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
and then build royale-asjs."
It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation. I did
understand it wrong.
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be
> independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default
> look for MXRoyale some day.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect
> build,
> for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > yep! :)))
> >
> >
> > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale
> branch.
> > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> release. We
> > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale
> since
> > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale
> will
> > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > >
> > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> > release
> > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.
> What do
> > > others think?
> > >
> >
> > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I
> think
> > is a good time
> > to see what will be merged
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a
> common
> > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it
> could
> > > wait until next month.
> > >
> >
> > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff,
> we
> > should consider to remove "themes"
> > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> themes
> > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> >
> > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think
> this
> > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate
> and
> > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> >
> > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
If we don't separate themes from the build for this release, it isn't that big a deal, IMO. But if we do separate it out, it will impact the instructions on how to build "everything" and releasecandidate.xml script will need updating as well to include the new Maven profile otherwise versions will not be updated in the theme poms.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 4/20/18, 9:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Alex,
I was considering this part from Carlos:
" If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
and then build royale-asjs."
It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation. I did
understand it wrong.
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be
> independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default
> look for MXRoyale some day.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect
> build,
> for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > yep! :)))
> >
> >
> > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale
> branch.
> > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> release. We
> > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale
> since
> > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale
> will
> > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > >
> > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> > release
> > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.
> What do
> > > others think?
> > >
> >
> > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I
> think
> > is a good time
> > to see what will be merged
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a
> common
> > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it
> could
> > > wait until next month.
> > >
> >
> > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff,
> we
> > should consider to remove "themes"
> > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> themes
> > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> >
> > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think
> this
> > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate
> and
> > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> >
> > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cce31810f0e1c4d50f96a08d5a6dcb6f2%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598389259527566&sdata=R%2F0nOUkz6xx5CA6YGDz9yy4Z5EQfsNR7PXkB%2FUBgGMM%3D&reserved=0>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Alex,
I was considering this part from Carlos:
" If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
and then build royale-asjs."
It looks like it is nothing what's actually impact Emulation. I did
understand it wrong.
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-04-20 17:53 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be
> independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default
> look for MXRoyale some day.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect
> build,
> for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > yep! :)))
> >
> >
> > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale
> branch.
> > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> release. We
> > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale
> since
> > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale
> will
> > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > >
> > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> > release
> > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.
> What do
> > > others think?
> > >
> >
> > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I
> think
> > is a good time
> > to see what will be merged
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a
> common
> > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it
> could
> > > wait until next month.
> > >
> >
> > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff,
> we
> > should consider to remove "themes"
> > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> themes
> > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> >
> > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think
> this
> > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate
> and
> > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> >
> > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
OK. I will have limited time this weekend but will look into build issues and give an all clear after verifying the nightly builds and fix the Maven build.
I don't have any deadline in mind for the release. I'd rather prove that someone else can use the release scripts to cut a release.
-Alex
On 4/20/18, 12:25 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Jewel is in the develop branch and some updates are in MXRoyale that I
> will merge to develop after I finish reviewing Alina's PRs from last night.
>
> What problems are you having with the nightly? We should iron those out
> before starting an RC.
>
I mentioned it here:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread.html%2F994a7665521cc4a64b99a5fe00ef13d9b7205ea413d3acfdc4515e3b%40%253Cdev.royale.apache.org%253E&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C1ac68dad388b49679b1608d5a6f46f76%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598491262175829&sdata=JWj7FPg%2FO0IewYxtLDla2mrluBQjlXG7hwF7zSmUldI%3D&reserved=0
>
> You are more than welcome to be the RM, especially if you are going to try
> the releasecandidate.xml scripts. I am hopeful that some day cutting a
> release will be straightforward. I will warn you that there might be some
> version number issues due to some recent changes in the Maven poms so make
> sure you have the time for it.
>
Sure, I would get like to get my hands dirty with this. Unless you are on
a strict timeline to release?
Thanks,
Om
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would really like to see Jewel in this release. The nightly builds
> dont
> work for me and I am blocked because of this.
>
> BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should
> be
> > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
> default
> > look for MXRoyale some day.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
> affect
> > build,
> > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > yep! :)))
> > >
> > >
> > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
> MXRoyale
> > branch.
> > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> > release. We
> > > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
> MXRoyale
> > since
> > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
> MXRoyale
> > will
> > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > >
> > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
> should
> > > release
> > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component
> sets.
> > What do
> > > > others think?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
> but I
> > think
> > > is a good time
> > > to see what will be merged
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
> create a
> > common
> > > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
> Or it
> > could
> > > > wait until next month.
> > > >
> > >
> > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
> stuff,
> > we
> > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
> way as
> > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> royale-asjs).
> > > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
> build
> > themes
> > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > >
> > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
> think
> > this
> > > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
> plate
> > and
> > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > >
> > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > <
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > >*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Jewel is in the develop branch and some updates are in MXRoyale that I
> will merge to develop after I finish reviewing Alina's PRs from last night.
>
> What problems are you having with the nightly? We should iron those out
> before starting an RC.
>
I mentioned it here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/994a7665521cc4a64b99a5fe00ef13d9b7205ea413d3acfdc4515e3b@%3Cdev.royale.apache.org%3E
>
> You are more than welcome to be the RM, especially if you are going to try
> the releasecandidate.xml scripts. I am hopeful that some day cutting a
> release will be straightforward. I will warn you that there might be some
> version number issues due to some recent changes in the Maven poms so make
> sure you have the time for it.
>
Sure, I would get like to get my hands dirty with this. Unless you are on
a strict timeline to release?
Thanks,
Om
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I would really like to see Jewel in this release. The nightly builds
> dont
> work for me and I am blocked because of this.
>
> BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should
> be
> > independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the
> default
> > look for MXRoyale some day.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may
> affect
> > build,
> > for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrovira@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com.invalid
> >:
> > >
> > > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > yep! :)))
> > >
> > >
> > > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the
> MXRoyale
> > branch.
> > > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> > release. We
> > > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in
> MXRoyale
> > since
> > > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in
> MXRoyale
> > will
> > > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > > >
> > > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we
> should
> > > release
> > > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component
> sets.
> > What do
> > > > others think?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale,
> but I
> > think
> > > is a good time
> > > to see what will be merged
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to
> create a
> > common
> > > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel.
> Or it
> > could
> > > > wait until next month.
> > > >
> > >
> > > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes
> stuff,
> > we
> > > should consider to remove "themes"
> > > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same
> way as
> > > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build
> royale-asjs).
> > > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first
> build
> > themes
> > > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> > >
> > > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I
> think
> > this
> > > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my
> plate
> > and
> > > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> > >
> > > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEc
> DpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > <
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%
> 7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%
> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=
> Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> > >*
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Jewel is in the develop branch and some updates are in MXRoyale that I will merge to develop after I finish reviewing Alina's PRs from last night.
What problems are you having with the nightly? We should iron those out before starting an RC.
You are more than welcome to be the RM, especially if you are going to try the releasecandidate.xml scripts. I am hopeful that some day cutting a release will be straightforward. I will warn you that there might be some version number issues due to some recent changes in the Maven poms so make sure you have the time for it.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/20/18, 9:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
I would really like to see Jewel in this release. The nightly builds dont
work for me and I am blocked because of this.
BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be
> independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default
> look for MXRoyale some day.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect
> build,
> for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > yep! :)))
> >
> >
> > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale
> branch.
> > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> release. We
> > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale
> since
> > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale
> will
> > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > >
> > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> > release
> > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.
> What do
> > > others think?
> > >
> >
> > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I
> think
> > is a good time
> > to see what will be merged
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a
> common
> > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it
> could
> > > wait until next month.
> > >
> >
> > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff,
> we
> > should consider to remove "themes"
> > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> themes
> > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> >
> > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think
> this
> > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate
> and
> > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> >
> > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEcDpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> >*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
I would really like to see Jewel in this release. The nightly builds dont
work for me and I am blocked because of this.
BTW, can I be the release manager for this one?
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 8:53 AM Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be
> independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default
> look for MXRoyale some day.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect
> build,
> for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> >
> > > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> > >
> > >
> > yep! :)))
> >
> >
> > > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale
> branch.
> > > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a
> release. We
> > > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale
> since
> > > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale
> will
> > > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> > >
> > > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> > release
> > > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets.
> What do
> > > others think?
> > >
> >
> > I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I
> think
> > is a good time
> > to see what will be merged
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a
> common
> > > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it
> could
> > > wait until next month.
> > >
> >
> > For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff,
> we
> > should consider to remove "themes"
> > folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> > "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> > If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build
> themes
> > and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
> >
> > Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think
> this
> > should not stop these release, since is something internal
> > Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate
> and
> > don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
> >
> > So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> > > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEcDpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
> >*
>
>
>
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Hi Piotr,
What kinds of impact are you concerned about? I think Jewel should be independent of MXRoyale for now, although we may use Jewel as the default look for MXRoyale some day.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 4/20/18, 4:46 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Alex,
I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect build,
for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> >
> >
> yep! :)))
>
>
> > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale branch.
> > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a release. We
> > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale since
> > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale will
> > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> >
> > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> release
> > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets. What do
> > others think?
> >
>
> I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I think
> is a good time
> to see what will be merged
>
>
>
> >
> > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a common
> > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it could
> > wait until next month.
> >
>
> For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff, we
> should consider to remove "themes"
> folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
> and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
>
> Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think this
> should not stop these release, since is something internal
> Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate and
> don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
>
> So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=3rxII8BoHbPEh6JmOXc9zpEBiiNMEcDpbYTZnkpJUaE%3D&reserved=0
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8c072c418de345acbb0608d5a6b454c3%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636598215807973526&sdata=Nv3WhatXm0bNEuF0eOBzA1AL%2FBBVPsYuebaTNJXP55s%3D&reserved=0>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Piotr Zarzycki <pi...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex,
I'm also fine with release. Does Jewel module in general may affect build,
for example Alina's build once Alex merge all ?
Thanks,
Piotr
2018-04-20 12:02 GMT+02:00 Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>:
> Hi Alex,
>
> 2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
>
> > So much for releasing early each month ;-)
> >
> >
> yep! :)))
>
>
> > I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale branch.
> > I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a release. We
> > will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale since
> > we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale will
> > result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
> >
> > The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should
> release
> > what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets. What do
> > others think?
> >
>
> I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I think
> is a good time
> to see what will be merged
>
>
>
> >
> > The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a common
> > base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it could
> > wait until next month.
> >
>
> For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff, we
> should consider to remove "themes"
> folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
> "examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
> If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
> and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
>
> Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think this
> should not stop these release, since is something internal
> Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate and
> don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
>
> So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> > Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > -Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Re: 0.9.3 Release
Posted by Carlos Rovira <ca...@apache.org>.
Hi Alex,
2018-04-20 5:05 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>:
> So much for releasing early each month ;-)
>
>
yep! :)))
> I merged develop and uibase-classname branches into the MXRoyale branch.
> I'm thinking of merging MXRoyale into develop and cutting a release. We
> will likely continue creating new emulation components in MXRoyale since
> we are inviting new contributors so continuing work in MXRoyale will
> result in less breaking of the nightly builds.
>
> The emulation components are far from finished, but IMO, we should release
> what we have. It shouldn't have impact on other component sets. What do
> others think?
>
I think that's ok, I still could not take a look at MXRoyale, but I think
is a good time
to see what will be merged
>
> The Jewel stuff seems to be working, but we might want to create a common
> base class for the new className/classList code in Jewel. Or it could
> wait until next month.
>
For Jewel I think all is ok, after some days of trying themes stuff, we
should consider to remove "themes"
folder for building directly, and we could split it the same way as
"examples" (that are not build directly when we build royale-asjs).
If we do this, we should let people know that they must first build themes
and then build royale-asjs. Just a suggestion.
Regarding to include JewelUIBase class, I'm for do it, but I think this
should not stop these release, since is something internal
Maybe I could have it done or not, I'm have many things on my plate and
don't know exactly how I'll be getting this done.
So for me is ok to include MXRoyale and cutting a 0.9.3 release
thanks
Carlos
> Anything else we need to add or remove from 0.9.3?
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
>
>
--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira