You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "angela (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/06/02 14:33:04 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6304) Cyclic dependency between
oak.spi.query an oak.query.*
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16034788#comment-16034788 ]
angela commented on OAK-6304:
-----------------------------
another example: {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.QueryIndex.FulltextQueryIndex}} defines {{NodeAggregator getNodeAggregator();}} but the {{NodeAggregator}} is not part of the query spi but rather defined in the {{o.a.j.oak.plugins.index.aggregate}} package space which additionally contains implementations which i would assume are not intended for public consumption.
> Cyclic dependency between oak.spi.query an oak.query.*
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6304
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: core, indexing, query
> Reporter: angela
>
> while working on OAK-6069 i noticed that there exist IMO troublesome dependencies from _o.a.j.oak.spi.query_ back to _o.a.j.oak.query.*_. While i don't know the historical reasons that led to this setup it feels wrong to me that the interfaces and classes in _o.a.j.oak.spi.query_ would have dependencies to packages that from my understanding are supposed to contain implementations.
> while utilities like {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.Cursors}} may simply have ended up in the wrong bucket and could possibly moved to e.g _o.a.j.query.index_, i couldn't find an easy solution for an interface like {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.Filter}} that defines methods returning {{o.a.j.query.fulltext.FullTextExpression}} and {{o.a.j.query.QueryEngineSettings}}, while at the same time being tied to the {{o.a.j.oak.spi.query.QueryIndex}} interface.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)