You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@daffodil.apache.org by "Steve Lawrence (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/02/04 20:28:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (DAFFODIL-2023) API reload(...) should not require a Channel. An input stream, URI, or byteArray should work.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Steve Lawrence closed DAFFODIL-2023.
------------------------------------

> API reload(...) should not require a Channel. An input stream, URI, or byteArray should work.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAFFODIL-2023
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2023
>             Project: Daffodil
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Mike Beckerle
>            Priority: Minor
>
> For JAPI, SAPI, and the regular internals, the use of Channels everywhere instead of regular java io streams is annoying.
> For DataProcessor.save, and compiler.reload, we should accept ordinary java.io.InputStream and java.io.OutputStream. 
> No point in making a java programmer understand Channels to use a simple API like this. 
> Our use of channels may be ill-advised here anyway. I can't recall the rationale for choosing them to begin with. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)