You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> on 2016/07/20 20:17:35 UTC
Release Solr 5.5.3
Hi,
With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it impacts
all users with high indexing rates.
If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, I'll
be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
Ok; thanks Anshum.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 1:40 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for
> 5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the
> section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and I
> should've done that as part of the release process but I think I missed the
> 5x, and master branches. I've added the 5.5.3 section to both, and moved
> your entry to a new 5.5.4 section on the 5x branch.
> 5.5.4 section addition on branch_5_5 is a part of the post-release
> process, so I'll remember to move this to the correct section when I add
> that.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Anhum,
>> Minutes ago I went and committed
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x,
>> branch_5x, and branch_5_5. While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the
>> last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new
>> 5.5.3. That is now committed. Then the realization hits me that you're
>> doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote So I guess I should change
>> those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so
>> it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene? BTW I think this
>> bug is "minor" IMO.
>> ~ David
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The release notes (draft) can be found here:
>>>
>>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
>>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
>>>
>>> Please feel free to edit/fix it.
>>>
>>> -Anshum
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>>> those using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise
>>>> alarm bells too loudly :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>>
>>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Hey David,
I'm just about to update the website and send out the notification for
5.5.3 in a few hours (as soon as I get some time at work). About the
section, I assume you are talking about the CHANGES.txt file and I
should've done that as part of the release process but I think I missed the
5x, and master branches. I've added the 5.5.3 section to both, and moved
your entry to a new 5.5.4 section on the 5x branch.
5.5.4 section addition on branch_5_5 is a part of the post-release process,
so I'll remember to move this to the correct section when I add that.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:17 AM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Anhum,
> Minutes ago I went and committed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x,
> branch_5x, and branch_5_5. While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the
> last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new
> 5.5.3. That is now committed. Then the realization hits me that you're
> doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote So I guess I should change
> those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so
> it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene? BTW I think this
> bug is "minor" IMO.
> ~ David
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> The release notes (draft) can be found here:
>>
>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
>>
>> Please feel free to edit/fix it.
>>
>> -Anshum
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>> those using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise
>>> alarm bells too loudly :-)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>>
>>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>
>> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
Anhum,
Minutes ago I went and committed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7417 to master, branch_6x,
branch_5x, and branch_5_5. While on both the v5 branches, I noticed the
last 5.5.x was specifically 5.5.2 so I went and added this under a new
5.5.3. That is now committed. Then the realization hits me that you're
doing a 5.5.3 release and it just passed a vote So I guess I should change
those entries to be 5.5.4 and probably also add a blank 5.5.3 section so
it's clear there were not additions in 5.5.3 for Lucene? BTW I think this
bug is "minor" IMO.
~ David
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:29 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> The release notes (draft) can be found here:
>
> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
>
> Please feel free to edit/fix it.
>
> -Anshum
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
>> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
>> bells too loudly :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>
>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
The release notes (draft) can be found here:
Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote553
Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote553
Please feel free to edit/fix it.
-Anshum
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
> bells too loudly :-)
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>
>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
No, our tests generally don't pass 100% of the times :). The RC is out for
vote btw.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:08 AM Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Are the tests failing due to patch for SOLR-9310? I think Noble put in fix
> yesterday or a day before.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding
>> me back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours).
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Uwe.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Anshum,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uwe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>
>>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>>
>>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
>>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>>>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to
>>>> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an
>>>> RC out on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Anshum
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
>>>> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
>>>> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
>>>> objections.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if
>>>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>>>> to that branch as well.
>>>>
>>>> Erick
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests
>>>> leading to
>>>> > unstable state in Solr.
>>>> >
>>>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing
>>>> requests.
>>>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <
>>>> david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>>> those
>>>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise
>>>> alarm
>>>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net
>>>> >
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it
>>>> else,
>>>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>>
>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>.
Are the tests failing due to patch for SOLR-9310? I think Noble put in fix
yesterday or a day before.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:48 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding
> me back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours).
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Uwe.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Anshum,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Uwe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>>
>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>
>>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>>
>>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>>
>>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
>>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
>>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to
>>> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an
>>> RC out on Wednesday.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Anshum
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
>>> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
>>> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
>>> objections.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if
>>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>>>
>>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>>> to that branch as well.
>>>
>>> Erick
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests
>>> leading to
>>> > unstable state in Solr.
>>> >
>>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
>>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <
>>> david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>> those
>>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise
>>> alarm
>>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I've been trying to the RC out since yesterday but our tests are holding me
back. Once they pass, I'll have the RC out (should be in a few hours).
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:37 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Thanks Uwe.
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Anshum,
>>
>>
>>
>> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>>
>>
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Uwe Schindler
>>
>> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>>
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>>
>> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>>
>>
>>
>> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to
>> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an
>> RC out on Wednesday.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Anshum
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
>> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
>> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
>> objections.
>>
>>
>>
>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if
>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>> to that branch as well.
>>
>> Erick
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading
>> to
>> > unstable state in Solr.
>> >
>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>> those
>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>> >>>
>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anshum Gupta
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Thanks Uwe.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:47 AM Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Hi Anshum,
>
>
>
> I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
>
>
>
> Uwe
>
>
>
> -----
>
> Uwe Schindler
>
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
>
> http://www.thetaphi.de
>
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
>
>
> *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
>
>
>
> With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to
> resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an
> RC out on Wednesday.
>
>
>
> -Anshum
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
> objections.
>
>
>
> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it
> makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>
> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
> to that branch as well.
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading
> to
> > unstable state in Solr.
> >
> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
> those
> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
> >> bells too loudly :-)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
> >>>
> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Anshum Gupta
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Anshum Gupta
>
>
RE: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi Anshum,
I will now enable the tests for 5.5 branch on Jenkins!
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: Anshum Gupta [mailto:anshum@anshumgupta.net]
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 7:01 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to resume the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an RC out on Wednesday.
-Anshum
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <ma...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote:
UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <ma...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote:
I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are objections.
@Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pushkar.raste@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <erickerickson@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
to that branch as well.
Erick
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <ma...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote:
> As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading to
> unstable state in Solr.
>
> How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
> Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> >
> wrote:
>>
>> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
>> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
>> bells too loudly :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net <ma...@anshumgupta.net> >
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>
>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org <ma...@lucene.apache.org>
--
Anshum Gupta
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
With SOLR-9310 out of the door and 6.2.0 out, this is a good time to resume
the 5.5.3 release. Unless any one has any objections, I'll have an RC out
on Wednesday.
-Anshum
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
> SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
> clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
>> objections.
>>
>> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if
>> it makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>>>> to that branch as well.
>>>>
>>>> Erick
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests
>>>> leading to
>>>> > unstable state in Solr.
>>>> >
>>>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing
>>>> requests.
>>>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <
>>>> david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>>> those
>>>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise
>>>> alarm
>>>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <anshum@anshumgupta.net
>>>> >
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it
>>>> else,
>>>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Anshum Gupta
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
UPDATE: I'm just holding back to see if we can have a solution for
SOLR-9310 and have # of upgrades for our users. If we don't have any
clarity by Thursday, I'll start working on the release.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
wrote:
> I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
> objections.
>
> @Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it
> makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
>> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>>> to that branch as well.
>>>
>>> Erick
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests
>>> leading to
>>> > unstable state in Solr.
>>> >
>>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
>>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <
>>> david.w.smiley@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>>> those
>>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise
>>> alarm
>>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Anshum Gupta
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
I plan on cutting the RC later tonight or tomorrow, unless there are
objections.
@Noble: Can you comment on the status of SOLR-9310 (on the JIRA) and if it
makes sense to hold 5.5.3 ?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
> On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
>> to that branch as well.
>>
>> Erick
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading
>> to
>> > unstable state in Solr.
>> >
>> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
>> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smiley@gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
>> those
>> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
>> >> bells too loudly :-)
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>> >>>
>> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Anshum Gupta
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Anshum Gupta
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Pushkar Raste <pu...@gmail.com>.
Can we also get SOLR-9310 in as well
On Jul 20, 2016 6:28 PM, "Erick Erickson" <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
> to that branch as well.
>
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading
> to
> > unstable state in Solr.
> >
> > How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
> > Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for
> those
> >> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
> >> bells too loudly :-)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
> >>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
> >>>
> >>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
> >>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Anshum Gupta
> >>
> >> --
> >> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> >> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> >> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
I also would like to get SOLR-7280 in, Noble and I just checked it in
to that branch as well.
Erick
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading to
> unstable state in Solr.
>
> How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
> Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
>> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
>> bells too loudly :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>>
>>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anshum Gupta
>>
>> --
>> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
>> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
As Shai mentioned, it is actually about SSL + indexing requests leading to
unstable state in Solr.
How quickly that state is reached is a function of # indexing requests.
Thanks for correcting me on that one :-).
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
> bells too loudly :-)
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>
>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
--
Anshum Gupta
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by Shai Erera <se...@gmail.com>.
Right, it affects SSL-enabled Solr more quickly. I do not know if it
eventually affects non-SSL Solr, I guess not ...
Also, it's not about high indexing rates, as it's reproduced with 9
docs/sec, IIRC.
Anyway, it certainly affected several users already, so I'm +1 for the
release.
Shai
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:35 PM David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
> using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
> bells too loudly :-)
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it
>> impacts all users with high indexing rates.
>>
>> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else,
>> I'll be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
Re: Release Solr 5.5.3
Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
Okay. BTW SOLR-9290 isn't "Just" high indexing rates, but it's for those
using SSL too -- correct me if I'm wrong. We don't want to raise alarm
bells too loudly :-)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:18 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With SOLR-9290 fixed, I think it calls for a bug fix release as it impacts
> all users with high indexing rates.
>
> If someone else wants to work on the release, I am fine with it else, I'll
> be happy to be the RM and cut an RC a week from now.
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com