You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2003/02/20 23:38:35 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17266] New: - Allows other extensions than ".jar" to be recognized in lib by Tomcat

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17266>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17266

Allows other extensions than ".jar" to be recognized in lib by Tomcat

           Summary: Allows other extensions than ".jar" to be recognized in
                    lib by Tomcat
           Product: Tomcat 4
           Version: 4.0 Beta 1
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Enhancement
          Priority: Other
         Component: Catalina
        AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: francis.andre@easynet.fr


Hi Tomcat People

It happens very often that our customers get difficulties in running Oracle 
JDBC apps with Tomcat due to the fact that Tomcat recognizes only the "jar" 
suffix for library and that Oracle delivers its JDBC driver within a zip 
suffixed file.

Would it be nice to have a option or parameter of Tomcat telling which are the 
suffixes it should take into account when running, with a default to "jar" to 
comply with the actual behavior.

Regards

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org