You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> on 2017/12/14 16:32:59 UTC

Releasing Aries JMX

Hi all,

I would like to release Aries JMX soon. In the past we released the Aries
all bundles together using a single version, i.e. Aries JMX 1.1.5 was a
release of all the bundles, but I see that jmx-core has since been release
individually, which from a modularity point of view makes more sense.

Therefore I propose to release the following bundles which have some
changes since the last release soon:
jmx-core: 1.1.8
jmx-blueprint-api: 1.1.6
jmx-blueprint-core: 1.1.6
jmx-core-whiteboard: 1.1.6
jmx-whiteboard: 1.2 (increase minor version since there is a new
feature ARIES-1766)

Or, alternatively I could release all of them under 1.2, but I would prefer
the individual modular release.

Thoughts anyone?

Cheers,

David

Re: Releasing Aries JMX

Posted by Dominik Przybysz <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 for individual modular release

Pozdrawiam,
Dominik Przybysz

14.12.2017 5:33 PM "David Bosschaert" <da...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):

Hi all,

I would like to release Aries JMX soon. In the past we released the Aries
all bundles together using a single version, i.e. Aries JMX 1.1.5 was a
release of all the bundles, but I see that jmx-core has since been release
individually, which from a modularity point of view makes more sense.

Therefore I propose to release the following bundles which have some
changes since the last release soon:
jmx-core: 1.1.8
jmx-blueprint-api: 1.1.6
jmx-blueprint-core: 1.1.6
jmx-core-whiteboard: 1.1.6
jmx-whiteboard: 1.2 (increase minor version since there is a new
feature ARIES-1766)

Or, alternatively I could release all of them under 1.2, but I would prefer
the individual modular release.

Thoughts anyone?

Cheers,

David

Re: Releasing Aries JMX

Posted by Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com>.
+1 for modular releases

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:

> +1 for individual module release
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 12/14/2017 05:32 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to release Aries JMX soon. In the past we released the Aries
>> all bundles together using a single version, i.e. Aries JMX 1.1.5 was a
>> release of all the bundles, but I see that jmx-core has since been release
>> individually, which from a modularity point of view makes more sense.
>>
>> Therefore I propose to release the following bundles which have some
>> changes since the last release soon:
>> jmx-core: 1.1.8
>> jmx-blueprint-api: 1.1.6
>> jmx-blueprint-core: 1.1.6
>> jmx-core-whiteboard: 1.1.6
>> jmx-whiteboard: 1.2 (increase minor version since there is a new
>> feature ARIES-1766)
>>
>> Or, alternatively I could release all of them under 1.2, but I would
>> prefer
>> the individual modular release.
>>
>> Thoughts anyone?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>



-- 
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
 (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)

Re: Releasing Aries JMX

Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 for individual module release

Regards
JB

On 12/14/2017 05:32 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to release Aries JMX soon. In the past we released the Aries
> all bundles together using a single version, i.e. Aries JMX 1.1.5 was a
> release of all the bundles, but I see that jmx-core has since been release
> individually, which from a modularity point of view makes more sense.
> 
> Therefore I propose to release the following bundles which have some
> changes since the last release soon:
> jmx-core: 1.1.8
> jmx-blueprint-api: 1.1.6
> jmx-blueprint-core: 1.1.6
> jmx-core-whiteboard: 1.1.6
> jmx-whiteboard: 1.2 (increase minor version since there is a new
> feature ARIES-1766)
> 
> Or, alternatively I could release all of them under 1.2, but I would prefer
> the individual modular release.
> 
> Thoughts anyone?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> David
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com