[jira] [Reopened] (JCR-3093) Inconsistency between Session.getProperty and Node.getProperty for binary values

["angela (Reopened) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

angela reopened JCR-3093:
-------------------------


ooops the fix introduced a regression as it used wrong index to build binary values
of a single-valued property.
                
> Inconsistency between Session.getProperty and Node.getProperty for binary values
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-3093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-3093
>             Project: Jackrabbit Content Repository
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: jackrabbit-spi2dav
>            Reporter: angela
>            Assignee: angela
>             Fix For: 2.3.3
>
>         Attachments: JCR-3093.patch
>
>
> there an inconsistency in the binary handling between the batch-reading facility and those cases where a property is directly
> accessed without having accessed the parent node before.
> this issue came up with timothee maret running into performance issues when retrieving the length of a binary property:
> if the property-entry has been created in the run of a batch-read operation the corresponding property-data object
> contains internal values that contain the length of the binary (such as transported with the json response) and only
> read the data from the server if the value stream is explicitly requested.
> however, if the property is accessed directly (e.g. Session.getProperty or Node.getProperty with a relative path) 
> a GET request is made to the corresponding dav resource and the stream is read immediately.
> possible solution:
> if RepositoryService#getItemInfos(SessionInfo, ItemId) is called with a PropertyId the implementation
> should not result in a GET request to the corresponding resource by calling super.getPropertyInfo(sessionInfo, (PropertyId) itemId).
> instead it should be consistent with the batch-read and only make a PROPFIND request for the property
> length. the returned PropertyInfo object would in that case be identical to the one generated by the batch-read functionality.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira