You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@trafficserver.apache.org by "Eagen, Dave" <Da...@biworldwide.com> on 2012/10/15 16:30:50 UTC
Crash when doing range lookup
I gave it a try but I couldn't get past configure:
./configure: line 29307: syntax error near unexpected token `luajit,'
./configure: line 29307: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(luajit, luajit, have_luajit=yes, have_luajit=no)'
-----Original Message-----
From: ming.zym@gmail.com [mailto:ming.zym@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:32 PM
To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
Cc: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: IRC disconnects
v3.2 have some broken Range codes changed by amc, which is fixed in the master later. in our own 3.2 tree, we have reverted the changes in Range, TS-475 TS-1265
FYI
在 2012-10-12五的 15:10 -0600，Leif Hedstrom写道：
> On 10/12/12 3:07 PM, Eagen, Dave wrote:
> > Yes, 3.2.3 crashed when we tried it with lookup enabled.
>
> Ok, that helps. Any chance you can try trunk ? Just want to make sure
> it's not something we've already looked at. Certainly the crasher is
> related to optimizations that were added for v3.2 (so 3.0 / 3.1 would
> not have these problems).
>
> -- Leif
>
This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by phone or reply by e-mail, delete the original message and destroy all copies. Thank you.
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Otto van der Schaaf <os...@gmail.com>.
+1
Otto
2012/10/16 Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk>
> Hi fellow dev@ people,
>
> We've been discussing the possibility of adding a page where third
> parties can get a mention if they support or do consulting on Apache
> Traffic Server, in the hopes that people seeking professional help can
> find it. As such, I have made a draft of a page that does just that, as
> well as reached out to the TS community to gather names of companies and
> individuals that do this sort of support. We have currently received the
> names of three companies offering professional support for ATS, and
> these have been put in the draft.
>
> The draft can be found at:
> http://trafficserver.staging.apache.org/assistance.html
>
> Anyone wishing to be on that list can get there by writing to dev@,
> stating their name, web site and a possible logo (which we may or may
> not use in the future). Anyone can apply to be on the list, no
> favouritism will be shown to any companies or individuals, nor will we
> endorse or highlight anyone in particular, as per the PMC branding
> guidelines of the foundation[1][2]. Any companies or individuals using
> this list to promote themselves by proclaiming the link to be an
> endorsement or affiliation will be removed promptly. If you have any
> questions or doubt about the branding responsibility of the PMC, please
> refer to the general trade mark policies of the ASF[3] or via email to
> trademarks@apache.org (or in a reply to this email, naturally).
>
>
> Now, without further ado, on to the exciting part; The vote!
>
> [ ] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
> [ ] +0: Meh
> [ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
>
>
> The vote is open for the standard 72 hours, standard consensus rules
> apply, and although this is a public discussion, only members of the PMC
> may cast binding votes, as the responsibility of such a page ultimately
> rests on the PMC. All other parties are of course welcome to weigh in
> with their opinion - in fact, we encourage it! Should the vote pass, we
> will publish the page on trafficserver.apache.org as well as add a link
> to it in our navigation.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
> [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
>
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org>.
On 10/16/12 6:24 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hi fellow dev@ people,
>
> We've been discussing the possibility of adding a page where third
> parties can get a mention if they support or do consulting on Apache
> Traffic Server, in the hopes that people seeking professional help can
> find it. As such, I have made a draft of a page that does just that, as
> well as reached out to the TS community to gather names of companies and
> individuals that do this sort of support. We have currently received the
> names of three companies offering professional support for ATS, and
> these have been put in the draft.
>
> The draft can be found at:
> http://trafficserver.staging.apache.org/assistance.html
+1.
-- Leif
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Gary Law <ga...@garylaw.net>.
On 16 October 2012 14:24, Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk> wrote:
[ X ] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
[ ] +0: Meh
[ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
IMO having a readily available list of support contacts allows
companies to adopt with confidence.
Gary
--
Gary Law
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by James Peach <ja...@me.com>.
On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:24 AM, Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk> wrote:
> Hi fellow dev@ people,
>
...
>
> Now, without further ado, on to the exciting part; The vote!
>
> [ ] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
> [ ] +0: Meh
> [ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
+1 from me. I think that commercial support could helpful for a lot of users.
J
[Result] [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk>.
With 7 binding +1 votes and 2 non-binding ones (and no 0s or -1s), this
proposal passes with flying colors. I'll start prepping the site for
this new page.
With regards,
Daniel.
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Davi Loperz <at...@gmail.com>.
+1
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by "ming.zym@gmail.com" <mi...@gmail.com>.
+1
在 2012-10-16二的 15:24 +0200，Daniel Gruno写道：
> Hi fellow dev@ people,
>
> We've been discussing the possibility of adding a page where third
> parties can get a mention if they support or do consulting on Apache
> Traffic Server, in the hopes that people seeking professional help can
> find it. As such, I have made a draft of a page that does just that, as
> well as reached out to the TS community to gather names of companies and
> individuals that do this sort of support. We have currently received the
> names of three companies offering professional support for ATS, and
> these have been put in the draft.
>
> The draft can be found at:
> http://trafficserver.staging.apache.org/assistance.html
>
> Anyone wishing to be on that list can get there by writing to dev@,
> stating their name, web site and a possible logo (which we may or may
> not use in the future). Anyone can apply to be on the list, no
> favouritism will be shown to any companies or individuals, nor will we
> endorse or highlight anyone in particular, as per the PMC branding
> guidelines of the foundation[1][2]. Any companies or individuals using
> this list to promote themselves by proclaiming the link to be an
> endorsement or affiliation will be removed promptly. If you have any
> questions or doubt about the branding responsibility of the PMC, please
> refer to the general trade mark policies of the ASF[3] or via email to
> trademarks@apache.org (or in a reply to this email, naturally).
>
>
> Now, without further ado, on to the exciting part; The vote!
>
> [ ] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
> [ ] +0: Meh
> [ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
>
>
> The vote is open for the standard 72 hours, standard consensus rules
> apply, and although this is a public discussion, only members of the PMC
> may cast binding votes, as the responsibility of such a page ultimately
> rests on the PMC. All other parties are of course welcome to weigh in
> with their opinion - in fact, we encourage it! Should the vote pass, we
> will publish the page on trafficserver.apache.org as well as add a link
> to it in our navigation.
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
> [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
--
Zhao Yongming
aka: zym @ apache.org, yonghao @ taobao.com
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Phil Sorber <so...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Brian Geffon <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> [x] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
>>> [ ] +0: Meh
>>> [ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
>>
>> i
>>
>> --
>> Igor Galić
>>
>> Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
>> Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
>> URL: http://brainsware.org/
>> GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
>>
+1
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Brian Geffon <br...@gmail.com>.
+1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org> wrote:
>
>
>> [x] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
>> [ ] +0: Meh
>> [ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
>
> i
>
> --
> Igor Galić
>
> Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
> Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
> URL: http://brainsware.org/
> GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
>
Re: [Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Igor Galić <i....@brainsware.org>.
> [x] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
> [ ] +0: Meh
> [ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
i
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.galic@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 6880 4155 74BD FD7C B515 2EA5 4B1D 9E08 A097 C9AE
[Vote] Establish a page for third part assistance
Posted by Daniel Gruno <ru...@cord.dk>.
Hi fellow dev@ people,
We've been discussing the possibility of adding a page where third
parties can get a mention if they support or do consulting on Apache
Traffic Server, in the hopes that people seeking professional help can
find it. As such, I have made a draft of a page that does just that, as
well as reached out to the TS community to gather names of companies and
individuals that do this sort of support. We have currently received the
names of three companies offering professional support for ATS, and
these have been put in the draft.
The draft can be found at:
http://trafficserver.staging.apache.org/assistance.html
Anyone wishing to be on that list can get there by writing to dev@,
stating their name, web site and a possible logo (which we may or may
not use in the future). Anyone can apply to be on the list, no
favouritism will be shown to any companies or individuals, nor will we
endorse or highlight anyone in particular, as per the PMC branding
guidelines of the foundation[1][2]. Any companies or individuals using
this list to promote themselves by proclaiming the link to be an
endorsement or affiliation will be removed promptly. If you have any
questions or doubt about the branding responsibility of the PMC, please
refer to the general trade mark policies of the ASF[3] or via email to
trademarks@apache.org (or in a reply to this email, naturally).
Now, without further ado, on to the exciting part; The vote!
[ ] +1: Establish a list of third parties offering assistance
[ ] +0: Meh
[ ] -1: Don't establish such a list, because...
The vote is open for the standard 72 hours, standard consensus rules
apply, and although this is a public discussion, only members of the PMC
may cast binding votes, as the responsibility of such a page ultimately
rests on the PMC. All other parties are of course welcome to weigh in
with their opinion - in fact, we encourage it! Should the vote pass, we
will publish the page on trafficserver.apache.org as well as add a link
to it in our navigation.
With regards,
Daniel.
[1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs
[3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/
RE: Crash when doing range lookup
Posted by "Eagen, Dave" <Da...@biworldwide.com>.
Thanks James. It built successfully and I have been running it for over 12 hours no with no problems with range lookups from cache enabled.
Is the patch for TS-1529 included in the current trunk?
-----Original Message-----
From: James Peach [mailto:jamespeach@me.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:30 AM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Cc: users@trafficserver.apache.org; Eagen, Dave
Subject: Re: Crash when doing range lookup
On Oct 15, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Eagen, Dave" <Da...@biworldwide.com> wrote:
> I gave it a try but I couldn't get past configure:
>
> ./configure: line 29307: syntax error near unexpected token `luajit,'
> ./configure: line 29307: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(luajit, luajit, have_luajit=yes, have_luajit=no)'
This means that you don't have pkg-config installed. You should install pkg-config from your distribution and then re-run "autoreconf -fi".
We have some build instructions for popular platforms here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Building. I've just updated them to include the pkg-config dependency.
J
This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by phone or reply by e-mail, delete the original message and destroy all copies. Thank you.
RE: Crash when doing range lookup
Posted by "Eagen, Dave" <Da...@biworldwide.com>.
Thanks James. It built successfully and I have been running it for over 12 hours no with no problems with range lookups from cache enabled.
Is the patch for TS-1529 included in the current trunk?
-----Original Message-----
From: James Peach [mailto:jamespeach@me.com]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:30 AM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Cc: users@trafficserver.apache.org; Eagen, Dave
Subject: Re: Crash when doing range lookup
On Oct 15, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Eagen, Dave" <Da...@biworldwide.com> wrote:
> I gave it a try but I couldn't get past configure:
>
> ./configure: line 29307: syntax error near unexpected token `luajit,'
> ./configure: line 29307: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(luajit, luajit, have_luajit=yes, have_luajit=no)'
This means that you don't have pkg-config installed. You should install pkg-config from your distribution and then re-run "autoreconf -fi".
We have some build instructions for popular platforms here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Building. I've just updated them to include the pkg-config dependency.
J
This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by phone or reply by e-mail, delete the original message and destroy all copies. Thank you.
Re: Crash when doing range lookup
Posted by James Peach <ja...@me.com>.
On Oct 15, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Eagen, Dave" <Da...@biworldwide.com> wrote:
> I gave it a try but I couldn't get past configure:
>
> ./configure: line 29307: syntax error near unexpected token `luajit,'
> ./configure: line 29307: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(luajit, luajit, have_luajit=yes, have_luajit=no)'
This means that you don't have pkg-config installed. You should install pkg-config from your distribution and then re-run "autoreconf -fi".
We have some build instructions for popular platforms here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TS/Building. I've just updated them to include the pkg-config dependency.
J
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ming.zym@gmail.com [mailto:ming.zym@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 8:32 PM
> To: users@trafficserver.apache.org
> Cc: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
> Subject: Re: IRC disconnects
>
> v3.2 have some broken Range codes changed by amc, which is fixed in the master later. in our own 3.2 tree, we have reverted the changes in Range, TS-475 TS-1265
>
> FYI
>
> 在 2012-10-12五的 15:10 -0600，Leif Hedstrom写道：
>> On 10/12/12 3:07 PM, Eagen, Dave wrote:
>>> Yes, 3.2.3 crashed when we tried it with lookup enabled.
>>
>> Ok, that helps. Any chance you can try trunk ? Just want to make sure
>> it's not something we've already looked at. Certainly the crasher is
>> related to optimizations that were added for v3.2 (so 3.0 / 3.1 would
>> not have these problems).
>>
>> -- Leif
>>
>
>
>
> This e-mail message is being sent solely for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by phone or reply by e-mail, delete the original message and destroy all copies. Thank you.