You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com> on 2010/07/10 20:38:41 UTC
json vs json-simple
Hi All.
We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform. We have
a couple of doubts:
- Which version is more stable? there is a 2.0-rc1 tag, and a 1.1-beta5. The
beta5 is published in repo1, so that is the one we are using. We have no
preferences over which spec to use (0.9 or 1.0).
- The project uses json and json-simple. Are both strictly necessary? Which
would you pick? We are also needing a json library, and we don't want to add
a new dependency, and we would like to save some refactor in case shindig
chooses one or the other.
Thanks a lot, and congrats for the excellent work.
--
Pablo Gra\~na
Chief Architect
Globant
Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
Re: json vs json-simple
Posted by Han Nguyen <hn...@us.ibm.com>.
The open source clearance for the replacement JSON library is taking us
more than expected. We anticipate to contribute the code mid September.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-1342
Han
From: Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com>
To: dev@shindig.apache.org
Date: 07/14/2010 09:37 PM
Subject: Re: json vs json-simple
We'll go for 1.1 Beta5 for now. And use org.json.
Thanks a lot for your answer.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
wrote:
> Oh and 2.0.0 won't need json-simple, since it's not a direct dependency.
> There's also been some talk of replacing the json.org code with
something
> similar. Perhaps the people working on that can give a status update on
> that...
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I spun off 2.0-rc1 a while back, however it's not stable. I'm
catching
> up
> > and will work to get an RC2 release this week and then a final 2.0.0
> release
> > in the next two weeks.
> >
> > 2010/7/10 Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com>
> >
> > Hi All.
> >>
> >> We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform.
We
> >> have
> >> a couple of doubts:
> >>
> >> - Which version is more stable? there is a 2.0-rc1 tag, and a
1.1-beta5.
> >> The
> >> beta5 is published in repo1, so that is the one we are using. We have
no
> >> preferences over which spec to use (0.9 or 1.0).
> >>
> >> - The project uses json and json-simple. Are both strictly necessary?
> >> Which
> >> would you pick? We are also needing a json library, and we don't want
to
> >> add
> >> a new dependency, and we would like to save some refactor in case
> shindig
> >> chooses one or the other.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot, and congrats for the excellent work.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pablo Gra\~na
> >> Chief Architect
> >> Globant
> >> Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
> >> UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
> >> US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Pablo Gra\~na
Chief Architect
Globant
Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
Re: json vs json-simple
Posted by Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com>.
We'll go for 1.1 Beta5 for now. And use org.json.
Thanks a lot for your answer.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> Oh and 2.0.0 won't need json-simple, since it's not a direct dependency.
> There's also been some talk of replacing the json.org code with something
> similar. Perhaps the people working on that can give a status update on
> that...
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I spun off 2.0-rc1 a while back, however it's not stable. I'm catching
> up
> > and will work to get an RC2 release this week and then a final 2.0.0
> release
> > in the next two weeks.
> >
> > 2010/7/10 Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com>
> >
> > Hi All.
> >>
> >> We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform. We
> >> have
> >> a couple of doubts:
> >>
> >> - Which version is more stable? there is a 2.0-rc1 tag, and a 1.1-beta5.
> >> The
> >> beta5 is published in repo1, so that is the one we are using. We have no
> >> preferences over which spec to use (0.9 or 1.0).
> >>
> >> - The project uses json and json-simple. Are both strictly necessary?
> >> Which
> >> would you pick? We are also needing a json library, and we don't want to
> >> add
> >> a new dependency, and we would like to save some refactor in case
> shindig
> >> chooses one or the other.
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot, and congrats for the excellent work.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pablo Gra\~na
> >> Chief Architect
> >> Globant
> >> Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
> >> UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
> >> US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Pablo Gra\~na
Chief Architect
Globant
Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
Re: json vs json-simple
Posted by Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>.
Oh and 2.0.0 won't need json-simple, since it's not a direct dependency.
There's also been some talk of replacing the json.org code with something
similar. Perhaps the people working on that can give a status update on
that...
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com> wrote:
> I spun off 2.0-rc1 a while back, however it's not stable. I'm catching up
> and will work to get an RC2 release this week and then a final 2.0.0 release
> in the next two weeks.
>
> 2010/7/10 Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com>
>
> Hi All.
>>
>> We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform. We
>> have
>> a couple of doubts:
>>
>> - Which version is more stable? there is a 2.0-rc1 tag, and a 1.1-beta5.
>> The
>> beta5 is published in repo1, so that is the one we are using. We have no
>> preferences over which spec to use (0.9 or 1.0).
>>
>> - The project uses json and json-simple. Are both strictly necessary?
>> Which
>> would you pick? We are also needing a json library, and we don't want to
>> add
>> a new dependency, and we would like to save some refactor in case shindig
>> chooses one or the other.
>>
>> Thanks a lot, and congrats for the excellent work.
>>
>> --
>> Pablo Gra\~na
>> Chief Architect
>> Globant
>> Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
>> UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
>> US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
>>
>
>
Re: json vs json-simple
Posted by Paul Lindner <pl...@linkedin.com>.
I spun off 2.0-rc1 a while back, however it's not stable. I'm catching up
and will work to get an RC2 release this week and then a final 2.0.0 release
in the next two weeks.
2010/7/10 Pablo Graña <pa...@globant.com>
> Hi All.
>
> We are starting working on integrating shindig in our own platform. We have
> a couple of doubts:
>
> - Which version is more stable? there is a 2.0-rc1 tag, and a 1.1-beta5.
> The
> beta5 is published in repo1, so that is the one we are using. We have no
> preferences over which spec to use (0.9 or 1.0).
>
> - The project uses json and json-simple. Are both strictly necessary? Which
> would you pick? We are also needing a json library, and we don't want to
> add
> a new dependency, and we would like to save some refactor in case shindig
> chooses one or the other.
>
> Thanks a lot, and congrats for the excellent work.
>
> --
> Pablo Gra\~na
> Chief Architect
> Globant
> Arg Office: +54 (11) 4109 1743
> UK Office: +44 (20) 7043 8269 int 8043
> US Office: +1 (212) 400 7686 int 8043
>