You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by Gabriela Gheorghe <ga...@disi.unitn.it> on 2010/01/22 11:24:00 UTC

reliability in SM 3.3+

Hi all, 

 

I am interested to know more about how Servicemix implements reliable
messaging (WS-Reliability).

 

The web page http://servicemix.apache.org/getting-started-guide-old.html
states that the WS-Reliability is a connected specification, but no reasons
for that. 

 

My question is how can SM argue that it implements WR-RM
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WS-ReliableMessaging ). Is there any case in
which the NMR might miss out some messages?

 

 

Best, 
Gabi

Re: reliability in SM 3.3+

Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

As WS-RM is based on soap message, so we support WS-RM through  
servicemix-cxf-bc component.

Freeman
On 2010-1-22, at 下午6:24, Gabriela Gheorghe wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I am interested to know more about how Servicemix implements reliable
> messaging (WS-Reliability).
>
>
>
> The web page http://servicemix.apache.org/getting-started-guide-old.html
> states that the WS-Reliability is a connected specification, but no  
> reasons
> for that.
>
>
>
> My question is how can SM argue that it implements WR-RM
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WS-ReliableMessaging ). Is there any  
> case in
> which the NMR might miss out some messages?
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
> Gabi
>
>
>


-- 
Freeman Fang
------------------------
Open Source SOA: http://fusesource.com