Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

[Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>]

wrowe@apache.org wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Fri Apr  8 17:38:46 2005
> New Revision: 160645

> @@ -208,7 +209,7 @@
>      * Win32: Move call to mpm_service_install to the rewrite_args hook
>        from the post_config hook.
>        http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=154319
> -      +1: stoddard, striker
> +      +1: stoddard, striker, wrowe (as corrected in subsequent patches)

Bill, could you please add the revisions of these subsequent patches?

>      * mod_version: New Module, Backport from trunk.
>        http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/metadata/mod_version.c
>        (Also need to backport docs, and build system stuff.)
> -      +1: pquerna, jerenkrantz
> +      +1: pquerna, jerenkrantz, wrowe (trivial, would even be cool in 1.3)

Paul, Justin, could you either provide me with a complete patch against 2.0.x
or add the revisions I need to merge?

Thanks,

Sander

mod_version for 2.0.x, was Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

Paul Querna wrote:
> Okay, I was backporting this, but ran into a few problems.
> 
> First, it requires a minor MMN bump to add the version API stuff. Thats 
> not too bad, and I was making a patch for all of it.
> 
> The biggest problem is that my working copy in subversion broke.  'svn 
> diff' just doesn't work right (added files are not shown).
> 
> I opened a bug report on it:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2270
> 
> I am ready to give up on mod_version for 2.0.54.... unless someone else 
> is feeling lucky..

Since the subversion people think that my 'expectations' of 'svn diff' 
working this way are wrong, I turned it into an integration branch:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/mod_version_for_2.0.x

I believe everything needed is done in that branch. Source Code 
(Including a Minor MMN Bump!), Build System and Documentation.

Because this backport has grown quite large, I reset the voting in the 
STATUS file -- I think people were mostly agreeing on the concept. 
Personally, I didn't see the need of a minor MMN bump until I did the 
backport.

-Paul

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

Paul Querna wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
> 
>> Paul, Justin, could you either provide me with a complete patch 
>> against 2.0.x
>> or add the revisions I need to merge?
>>
> 
> I am backporting mod_version right now.
> 

Okay, I was backporting this, but ran into a few problems.

First, it requires a minor MMN bump to add the version API stuff. Thats 
not too bad, and I was making a patch for all of it.

The biggest problem is that my working copy in subversion broke.  'svn 
diff' just doesn't work right (added files are not shown).

I opened a bug report on it:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2270

I am ready to give up on mod_version for 2.0.54.... unless someone else 
is feeling lucky..

-Paul

Re: svn commit: r160645 - httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

Sander Striker wrote:
> Paul, Justin, could you either provide me with a complete patch against 
> 2.0.x
> or add the revisions I need to merge?
> 

I am backporting mod_version right now.