You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Jin Xing (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/12/22 11:20:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-20716) Pluggable shuffle service public
interface IndexedInputGate mixed with Netty shuffle service implementation.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20716?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17253414#comment-17253414 ]
Jin Xing commented on FLINK-20716:
----------------------------------
Gentle ping [~AHeise] [~kevin.cyj];
Also I think this might be related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12873
> Pluggable shuffle service public interface IndexedInputGate mixed with Netty shuffle service implementation.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-20716
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20716
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jin Xing
> Priority: Major
>
> IndexedInputGate provided by pluggable shuffle service as a public interface, and intend to allow user to extend/customize the shuffle-read behavior. Currently its method of IndexedInputGate#getChannel returns InputChannel, which from my understanding binds to Netty shuffle service implementation. Should we keep IndexedInputGate independent ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)