You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com> on 2022/05/04 19:20:17 UTC

[RESULT] Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0

Results of the Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0 release vote:

Vote passes with 7 binding votes and 2 non binding Votes = 9 Votes.

Binding:
- Timothy Bish
- Jean-Baptiste Onofre
- Francesco Nigro
- Christopher Shannon
- Robbie Gemmel
- Gary Tully
- Justin Bertram

 Non binding:
- Domenico Francesco Bruscino
- Etienne Hossack


Thank you for everyone contributing to this release.

Also thank everybody for the time taken on voting and trying out the
release candidate.


I will update the website and everything...and will send the
announcement when ready.

Regards

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:29 PM Étienne Hossack <ac...@hossack.me> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Bit late, but LGTM
>
> Docker image is helpful, could be a good thing to build automatically in the future!
>
> --
> Étienne
> he/him/his
>
> On Tue, 3 May 2022, at 2:07 AM, Domenico Francesco Bruscino wrote:
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > * Checked parent version in pom.xml files using `grep -LPrz --include
> > pom.xml "<parent>(.|\n)*<version>2.22.0<\/version>(.|\n)*<\/parent>" ./`
> > * Ran binary broker instance on Fedora 32 using OpenJDK 11
> > * Checked the web console using `Google Chrome`
> > * Checked producing, browsing and consuming messages from a queue using
> > `artemis check queue --name TEST --produce 1000 --browse 1000 --consume
> > 1000`
> >
> > On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 at 23:16, Havret <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I've run the tests against ArtemisNetClient[1]. It's all green.
> >>
> >> To make the testing easier, I've created a docker image[2] with the release
> >> candidate binaries. Feel free to use it to run your tests.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/Havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client/pull/345
> >> [2] docker pull
> >> havret/dotnet-activemq-artemis-client-test-broker:2.22.0-rc1
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 5:02 PM Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> >  - Ran a few tests
> >> >  - Verified signature and checksum
> >> >  - Built from source
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Justin
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:30 AM Clebert Suconic <
> >> > clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.22.0 release.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > There are no new features on this release, however there are many
> >> > > improvements and bug fixes.
> >> > >
> >> > > In particular there's a default change on cluster connections where we
> >> > > now use 1MB bytes for flow control, avoiding Out Of Memory exception
> >> > > on situations with high latency networking:
> >> > >
> >> > > * ARTEMIS-3083 Set a default producer-window-size on cluster connection
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > There are many other improvements and bug fixes and the full release
> >> > > notes is available here for more information:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315920&version=12351488
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Ths git commit report is here:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/download/commit-report-2.22.0
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Source and binary distributions can be found here:
> >> > >
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/activemq/activemq-artemis/2.22.0
> >> > >
> >> > > The Maven staged repository is here:
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1251
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > In case you want to give it a try with the maven repo on examples:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/hacking-guide/validating-releases.html
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > The source tag:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq-artemis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/2.22.0
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > [ ] +1 approve this release
> >> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Here's my +1 (Binding) vote
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I should keep this release open for 72 Hours, and I'm not going to
> >> > > count the weekend as business hours. That means I will keep this
> >> > > release open until at least May-3rd, Noon USA EST.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>



-- 
Clebert Suconic