You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Mahadev konar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/07/27 17:31:10 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-837) cyclic dependency ClientCnxn,
ZooKeeper
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mahadev konar updated ZOOKEEPER-837:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.4.0)
3.5.0
Moving this out to 3.5 for cleanup.
> cyclic dependency ClientCnxn, ZooKeeper
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-837
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-837
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 3.3.1
> Reporter: Patrick Datko
> Assignee: Thomas Koch
> Fix For: 3.5.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch, ZOOKEEPER-837.patch
>
>
> ZooKeeper instantiates ClientCnxn in its ctor with this and therefor builds a
> cyclic dependency graph between both objects. This means, you can't have the
> one without the other. So why did you bother do make them to separate classes
> in the first place?
> ClientCnxn accesses ZooKeeper.state. State should rather be a property of
> ClientCnxn. And ClientCnxn accesses zooKeeper.get???Watches() in its method
> primeConnection(). I've not yet checked, how this dependency should be
> resolved better.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira