You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Benson Margulies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/01/18 18:40:21 UTC

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-5405) Exception strategy for analysis improved

Benson Margulies created LUCENE-5405:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Exception strategy for analysis improved
                 Key: LUCENE-5405
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5405
             Project: Lucene - Core
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Benson Margulies


SOLR-5623 included some conversation about the dilemmas of exception management and reporting in the analysis chain. Here is a 5.0 proposal:

TokenStream.reset and TokenStream.incrementToken (and perhaps the rest) should have a new, checked, exception in their signatures: call it AnalysisError if you like. Unlike IOException, it will have a full set of constructors, including the constructors that can wrap a 'cause'. Its constructors will accept a field name.

TokenStream will have a fieldName field, accepted in a constructor argument. (OK, this might a bit authoritarian.)

TokenStream will have:

  protected void throwAnalysisException(String explanation, Throwable cause) {
    throw new AnalysisException(fieldName, explanation, cause);
  }

Implementors of analysis will be thus encouraged to write things like:

  try {
    doSomething();
  } catch (IOExceptionOrWhatever e) {
    throwAnalysisException("Some Explanation", e);
 }

Then, situations like Solr can diagnose the field name.

Note that no information is lost here, due to the use of exception wrapping.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org