You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apache-bugdb@apache.org by Tim Shoppa <sh...@trailing-edge.com> on 2002/01/29 20:50:18 UTC
general/9639: Apache will not deliver a "Last-modified:" header of before Jan 1, 1970
>Number: 9639
>Category: general
>Synopsis: Apache will not deliver a "Last-modified:" header of before Jan 1, 1970
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: apache
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: apache
>Arrival-Date: Tue Jan 29 12:00:01 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: shoppa@trailing-edge.com
>Release: 1.3.22
>Organization:
apache
>Environment:
Linux 2.4.16
>Description:
I have many files with datestamps from before Jan 1, 1970. Apache
will not serve them with their true datestamps in the "Last-modified:"
header.
Same is true for CGI scripts which return "Last-modified:" dates from
before Jan 1, 1970; the header gets converted to Jan 1, 1970.
I know that internally Apache certainly carries around dates as seconds
since Jan 1, 1970, but many (most?) OS's are quite happy with datestamps
in the range 1903-2038 (i.e. 32-bit signed integer for # seconds offset
from the epoch.)
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
[to include <ap...@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
[subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
[or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ]
["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ]
[pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ]
["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ]
[the database automatically because of the potential for mail ]
[loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ]
[developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]