[jira] [Commented] (SUREFIRE-1222) ForkClient attempts to consume unrelated lines

["Tibor Digana (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15504992#comment-15504992 ] 

Tibor Digana commented on SUREFIRE-1222:
----------------------------------------

[~mkouba]
This happens if the code or test calls {{java.lang.System.setOut(...)}}.
Can you have a look in your project?

> ForkClient attempts to consume unrelated lines
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SUREFIRE-1222
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1222
>             Project: Maven Surefire
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Maven Surefire Plugin, process forking
>    Affects Versions: 2.17
>         Environment: Oracle JDK7 (build 1.7.0_79-b15)
> Linux 3.13 x86_64 with default locale cs_CZ
>            Reporter: Martin Kouba
>
> This month the [Weld SE|https://github.com/weld/core/tree/2.3/environments/se/tests] test suite suddenly started to fail on a Linux machine with Oracle JDK7 and the default locale {{cs_CZ}}:
> {code}
> Caused by: java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1
> 	at java.lang.String.substring(String.java:1911)
> 	at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.output.ForkClient.consumeLine(ForkClient.java:128)
> 	at org.apache.maven.plugin.surefire.booterclient.output.ThreadedStreamConsumer$Pumper.run(ThreadedStreamConsumer.java:67)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> A {{java.util.logging.Logger}} is used in the forked process. The exception occurs when the following log message is written to the standard output:
> {code}
> I 29, 2016 2:01:43 ODP. org.jboss.arquillian.container.se.server.Main main
> {code}
> We have found out that the timestamp *I 29, 2016 2:01:43* (i.e. 2016-01-29 14:01:43) is incorrectly parsed as {{ForkingRunListener.BOOTERCODE_SYSPROPS}} operation.
> I think the protocol should be robust enough to avoid similar collisions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)