You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cxf.apache.org by Andrea Smyth <an...@iona.com> on 2006/09/06 19:07:30 UTC
Re: version number....
Any reason to not define a property like
<cxf.version>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT</cxf.version> in the top level
pom.xml and use that in all other pom.xml files?
Andrea.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
>Looks like it's pretty unanimous to go with a 2.0 version number. I'm going
>to update the poms to have the version number:
>
>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT
>
>I'm also going to update the top level pom's distribution management section
>to reflect the new incubating repository guidelines at:
>http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>
>On Friday August 25 2006 11:19 am, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
>>Right now, the poms all are set to 1.1-SNAPSHOT. Since we have to change
>>them, what are people's thoughts on the version number. Couple of
>>options:
>>
>>1) 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - since it's the first apache version
>>2) 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - since both XFire and Celtix had 1.x releases
>>3) Other options?
>>
>>I'm kind of leaning toward option (2). Actually, probably do:
>> 2.0-incubating-m1-SNAPSHOT
>>to reflect we're working toward milestone 1. Then hopefully start
>>releasing periodic milestones.
>>
>>Any thoughts!
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: version number....
Posted by Andrea Smyth <an...@iona.com>.
Oh, that makes sense of course.
I thought I had seen a property used that way - but it must have been in
specifying the version of a dependency :(
Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>Any reason to not define a property like
>><cxf.version>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT</cxf.version> in the top level
>>pom.xml and use that in all other pom.xml files?
>>
>>
>
>Cause you can't do it. It won't work properly.
>
>The <version> part of the <parent> needs to be explicitly set so maven can
>FIND the parent pom.xml. Otherwise, it won't know if the parent is 2.0,
>2.1, etc...
>
>Dan
>
>
>
>On Wednesday September 06 2006 1:07 pm, Andrea Smyth wrote:
>
>
>>Any reason to not define a property like
>><cxf.version>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT</cxf.version> in the top level
>>pom.xml and use that in all other pom.xml files?
>>
>>Andrea.
>>
>>Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Looks like it's pretty unanimous to go with a 2.0 version number. I'm
>>>going to update the poms to have the version number:
>>>
>>>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT
>>>
>>>I'm also going to update the top level pom's distribution management
>>>section to reflect the new incubating repository guidelines at:
>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html
>>>
>>>Dan
>>>
>>>On Friday August 25 2006 11:19 am, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Right now, the poms all are set to 1.1-SNAPSHOT. Since we have to
>>>>change them, what are people's thoughts on the version number. Couple
>>>>of options:
>>>>
>>>>1) 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - since it's the first apache version
>>>>2) 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - since both XFire and Celtix had 1.x
>>>>releases 3) Other options?
>>>>
>>>>I'm kind of leaning toward option (2). Actually, probably do:
>>>>2.0-incubating-m1-SNAPSHOT
>>>>to reflect we're working toward milestone 1. Then hopefully start
>>>>releasing periodic milestones.
>>>>
>>>>Any thoughts!
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
Re: version number....
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
> Any reason to not define a property like
> <cxf.version>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT</cxf.version> in the top level
> pom.xml and use that in all other pom.xml files?
Cause you can't do it. It won't work properly.
The <version> part of the <parent> needs to be explicitly set so maven can
FIND the parent pom.xml. Otherwise, it won't know if the parent is 2.0,
2.1, etc...
Dan
On Wednesday September 06 2006 1:07 pm, Andrea Smyth wrote:
> Any reason to not define a property like
> <cxf.version>2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT</cxf.version> in the top level
> pom.xml and use that in all other pom.xml files?
>
> Andrea.
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >Looks like it's pretty unanimous to go with a 2.0 version number. I'm
> > going to update the poms to have the version number:
> >
> >2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT
> >
> >I'm also going to update the top level pom's distribution management
> > section to reflect the new incubating repository guidelines at:
> >http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >On Friday August 25 2006 11:19 am, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>Right now, the poms all are set to 1.1-SNAPSHOT. Since we have to
> >> change them, what are people's thoughts on the version number. Couple
> >> of options:
> >>
> >>1) 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - since it's the first apache version
> >>2) 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT - since both XFire and Celtix had 1.x
> >> releases 3) Other options?
> >>
> >>I'm kind of leaning toward option (2). Actually, probably do:
> >> 2.0-incubating-m1-SNAPSHOT
> >>to reflect we're working toward milestone 1. Then hopefully start
> >>releasing periodic milestones.
> >>
> >>Any thoughts!
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001
daniel.kulp@iona.com