You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by France <ma...@isg.si> on 2015/06/24 14:49:05 UTC
Which 4.3.2 CS build to use? Shapeblue's version or build from official repos?
Hi all,
we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/) to 4.3.2 this weekend.
In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no 4.3.2.
There is some build in Shapeblue’s repo: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/
and they also provide additionally pached build via: http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/
Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the yum repository?
Tnx for info.
Regards,
F.
Re: Which 4.3.2 CS build to use? Shapeblue's version or build from
official repos?
Posted by Rajani Karuturi <ra...@apache.org>.
I havent used any of them. So, I could not recommend anyone.
Building from source code [1] is the best way. As you would be in sync with
community in terms of releases and issues. Taking a precompiled version
doesnt guarantee if its the release that is voted by this community and
makes it difficult to report an issue or get a fix for it from the
community.
Thats my personal opinion and I understand that many prefer rpms/debs.
[1] https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html
~Rajani
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:46 PM, France <ma...@isg.si> wrote:
> Tnx for response Rajani, it is greatly appreciated.
>
> You are correct, I do not know how i missed out, 4.3.2 in official repos.
> Probably due to too much work. :-)
>
> However your response in regards of which to choose, does not really help
> me. I have decided none the less, to use additionally patched build from
> Shapeblue.
> Unless someone warns me about potential problems with their patches, we
> will stick to my decision for this weekends upgrade.
>
> Regards,
> F.
>
> On 25 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Rajani Karuturi <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > you can use anything as long as it works for you.
> > AFAIK, packages on apt-get.eu are created from the point where RC is
> voted
> > and they do have 4.3.2 in the link you mentioned above.
> >
> > ~Rajani
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, France <ma...@isg.si> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/)
> to
> >> 4.3.2 this weekend.
> >>
> >> In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no
> >> 4.3.2.
> >> There is some build in Shapeblue’s repo:
> >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/
> >> and they also provide additionally pached build via:
> >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/
> >>
> >> Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the
> yum
> >> repository?
> >>
> >> Tnx for info.
> >> Regards,
> >> F.
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Which 4.3.2 CS build to use? Shapeblue's version or build from official repos?
Posted by France <ma...@isg.si>.
Tnx for response Rajani, it is greatly appreciated.
You are correct, I do not know how i missed out, 4.3.2 in official repos. Probably due to too much work. :-)
However your response in regards of which to choose, does not really help me. I have decided none the less, to use additionally patched build from Shapeblue.
Unless someone warns me about potential problems with their patches, we will stick to my decision for this weekends upgrade.
Regards,
F.
On 25 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Rajani Karuturi <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
> you can use anything as long as it works for you.
> AFAIK, packages on apt-get.eu are created from the point where RC is voted
> and they do have 4.3.2 in the link you mentioned above.
>
> ~Rajani
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, France <ma...@isg.si> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/) to
>> 4.3.2 this weekend.
>>
>> In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no
>> 4.3.2.
>> There is some build in Shapeblue’s repo:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/
>> and they also provide additionally pached build via:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/
>>
>> Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the yum
>> repository?
>>
>> Tnx for info.
>> Regards,
>> F.
>>
>>
Re: Which 4.3.2 CS build to use? Shapeblue's version or build from
official repos?
Posted by Rajani Karuturi <ra...@apache.org>.
you can use anything as long as it works for you.
AFAIK, packages on apt-get.eu are created from the point where RC is voted
and they do have 4.3.2 in the link you mentioned above.
~Rajani
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 6:19 PM, France <ma...@isg.si> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we will upgrade CS 4.3.1 (from http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/) to
> 4.3.2 this weekend.
>
> In official repos: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.3/ there is no
> 4.3.2.
> There is some build in Shapeblue’s repo:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/centos/4.3/
> and they also provide additionally pached build via:
> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/main/centos/4.3/
>
> Is there any reason not to choose their patched version and change the yum
> repository?
>
> Tnx for info.
> Regards,
> F.
>
>