You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@hbase.apache.org by stack <st...@duboce.net> on 2008/05/08 02:03:40 UTC
[ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back any issues
encountered (or the fact that it just worked for you). Check the
documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc.
This candidate has had some critical fixes added since candidate-0.
Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the debugging including
Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
St.Ack
Re: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I forgot to note that voting whether yay or nay on whether we should
release this candidate as 0.1.2 will close Monday, May 12th.
St.Ack
stack wrote:
> The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
>
> Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back any issues
> encountered (or the fact that it just worked for you). Check the
> documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc.
>
> This candidate has had some critical fixes added since candidate-0.
> Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the debugging
> including Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
>
> St.Ack
RE: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
Posted by Jim Kellerman <ji...@powerset.com>.
+1
Tests all work, documentation does not have any broken links (that I found) and config files look good.
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stack [mailto:stack@duboce.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 5:04 PM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org; hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are
> zero-based)
>
> The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
>
> Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back
> any issues encountered (or the fact that it just worked for
> you). Check the documentation, that unit tests all complete
> on your platform, etc.
>
> This candidate has had some critical fixes added since candidate-0.
> Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the debugging
> including Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
>
> St.Ack
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.10/1421 - Release
> Date: 5/7/2008 5:23 PM
>
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.10/1421 - Release Date: 5/7/2008 5:23 PM
Re: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I forgot to note that voting whether yay or nay on whether we should
release this candidate as 0.1.2 will close Monday, May 12th.
St.Ack
stack wrote:
> The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
>
> Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back any issues
> encountered (or the fact that it just worked for you). Check the
> documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc.
>
> This candidate has had some critical fixes added since candidate-0.
> Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the debugging
> including Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
>
> St.Ack
Re: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
Posted by Michaela Buergle <Mi...@neofonie.de>.
FYI: the TableNotDisabledException problem I reported about a week ago
doesn't seem to arise with the 0.1.2 candidate.
micha
stack wrote:
> +1. I downloaded it, ran it, checked out docs.
>
> Release has 3 +1 votes and no detractors.
>
> I'll put up the release later this evening.
>
> St.Ack
>
>
> Bryan Duxbury wrote:
>> I downloaded the release and ran the unit tests successfully. +1
>> -Bryan
>>
>> On May 7, 2008, at 5:03 PM, stack wrote:
>>
>>> The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
>>>
>>> Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back any
>>> issues encountered (or the fact that it just worked for you). Check
>>> the documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc.
>>>
>>> This candidate has had some critical fixes added since candidate-0.
>>> Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the debugging
>>> including Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>
>
Re: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
+1. I downloaded it, ran it, checked out docs.
Release has 3 +1 votes and no detractors.
I'll put up the release later this evening.
St.Ack
Bryan Duxbury wrote:
> I downloaded the release and ran the unit tests successfully. +1
> -Bryan
>
> On May 7, 2008, at 5:03 PM, stack wrote:
>
>> The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
>>
>> Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back any
>> issues encountered (or the fact that it just worked for you). Check
>> the documentation, that unit tests all complete on your platform, etc.
>>
>> This candidate has had some critical fixes added since candidate-0.
>> Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the debugging
>> including Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
>>
>> St.Ack
>
Re: [ANN] hbase-0.1.2 release candidate 1 (releases are zero-based)
Posted by Bryan Duxbury <br...@rapleaf.com>.
I downloaded the release and ran the unit tests successfully. +1
-Bryan
On May 7, 2008, at 5:03 PM, stack wrote:
> The second 0.1.2 release candidate is available for download:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.1.2-candidate-1/
>
> Please take this release candidate for a spin. Report back any
> issues encountered (or the fact that it just worked for you).
> Check the documentation, that unit tests all complete on your
> platform, etc.
>
> This candidate has had some critical fixes added since
> candidate-0. Thanks to all who reported and then helped with the
> debugging including Erik Holstad and Daniel Leffel.
>
> St.Ack