You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to taglibs-user@tomcat.apache.org by Steve Bang <SB...@alphablox.com> on 2002/04/11 01:32:54 UTC
JSTL taglib directive prefix and
In the JSTL specs, examples show prefixes such as c_rt, yet the <short-name>
in the TLD says "c-rt" should be the prefix. This would apply to all of the
other rt tags too. Which is correct? Shouldn't the <short-name> match the
prefix? That seems to be implied by the short-name description in the JSP
1.2 specs:
"a simple default short name that could be used by a JSP page
authoring tool to create names with a mnemonic value; for
example, the it may be used as the preferred prefix value in taglib
directives."
Steve
Steve Bang
Sr. Staff Information Developer
AlphaBlox (http://www.alphablox.com)
(650) 526-1782
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: JSTL taglib directive prefix and
Posted by Shawn Bayern <ba...@essentially.net>.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Steve Bang wrote:
> In the JSTL specs, examples show prefixes such as c_rt, yet the <short-name>
> in the TLD says "c-rt" should be the prefix. This would apply to all of the
> other rt tags too. Which is correct? Shouldn't the <short-name> match the
> prefix? That seems to be implied by the short-name description in the JSP
> 1.2 specs:
>
> "a simple default short name that could be used by a JSP page
> authoring tool to create names with a mnemonic value; for
> example, the it may be used as the preferred prefix value in taglib
> directives."
Yes, good catch -- although <short-name> isn't meant to be canonical, just
suggestive. The spec's use of underscores is correct, and the TLDs were
wrong; I've changed them. Thanks, Steve.
--
Shawn Bayern
Author, "JSP Standard Tag Library" http://www.jstlbook.com
(coming this summer from Manning Publications)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>