You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Amit Jain <am...@apache.org> on 2015/07/31 11:01:56 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.18/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.18/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b.
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/
The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is:
$ sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.18
ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
My vote is +1
Thanks
Amit
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2015-07-31 14:42, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Julian Reschke
> <ju...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
>>> Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.595 sec
>>> <<< FAILURE!
>>>
>>> copyOnWriteAndLocks(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest)
>>> Time elapsed: 0.182 sec <<< ERROR!
>>> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakLucene0003: Failed
>>> to index the node /test
>
> Thats a known issue on Windows OAK-3072. Not a blocker for this release
>
> Chetan Mehrotra
Indeed. And I even disabled the test two weeks ago in trunk and 1.2, but
not in 1.0.
In general I'm a bit unhappy about the unit tests being broken almost
all the time, at least on Windows. (trunk currently fails due to recent
changes from Stefan Egli - is it again just Windows related???)
Best regards, Julian
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
Posted by Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Julian Reschke
<ju...@greenbytes.de> wrote:
>> Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.595 sec
>> <<< FAILURE!
>>
>> copyOnWriteAndLocks(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest)
>> Time elapsed: 0.182 sec <<< ERROR!
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakLucene0003: Failed
>> to index the node /test
Thats a known issue on Windows OAK-3072. Not a blocker for this release
Chetan Mehrotra
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@greenbytes.de>.
On 2015-07-31 11:01, Amit Jain wrote:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.18/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
> ...
Apart from the well-known test failures in ClockTest, I also see
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.MultiSessionQueryTest
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.343 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryFulltextTest
> Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.163 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryJcrTest
> Tests run: 218, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 74.315 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.ResultSizeTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.726 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.SpellcheckTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.515 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.SuggestTest
> Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.552 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.TextExtractionQueryTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.002 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.AggregateTest
> Tests run: 17, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.IndexCopierTest
> Tests run: 21, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3, Time elapsed: 0.223 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.IndexDefinitionTest
> Tests run: 34, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.13 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.IndexPlannerTest
> Tests run: 22, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.183 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAggregationTest
> Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.872 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest
> Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.595 sec <<< FAILURE!
> copyOnWriteAndLocks(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest) Time elapsed: 0.182 sec <<< ERROR!
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakLucene0003: Failed to index the node /test
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditor.addOrUpdate(LuceneIndexEditor.java:301)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditor.leave(LuceneIndexEditor.java:193)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.CompositeEditor.leave(CompositeEditor.java:74)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.VisibleEditor.leave(VisibleEditor.java:63)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorDiff.childNodeAdded(EditorDiff.java:130)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.memory.ModifiedNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(ModifiedNodeState.java:393)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorDiff.process(EditorDiff.java:52)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorHook.processCommit(EditorHook.java:54)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.copyOnWriteAndLocks(LuceneIndexEditorTest.java:376)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
> at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:46)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
> at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Cannot overwrite: C:\tmp\junit243559197843716112\2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae\1\_1.fdt
> at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.ensureCanWrite(FSDirectory.java:293)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.createOutput(FSDirectory.java:282)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.IndexCopier$CopyOnWriteDirectory$COWLocalFileReference.createOutput(IndexCopier.java:952)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.IndexCopier$CopyOnWriteDirectory.createOutput(IndexCopier.java:689)
> at org.apache.lucene.store.TrackingDirectoryWrapper.createOutput(TrackingDirectoryWrapper.java:44)
> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40StoredFieldsWriter.<init>(Lucene40StoredFieldsWriter.java:95)
> at org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene40.Lucene40StoredFieldsFormat.fieldsWriter(Lucene40StoredFieldsFormat.java:97)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsProcessor.initFieldsWriter(StoredFieldsProcessor.java:88)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.StoredFieldsProcessor.finishDocument(StoredFieldsProcessor.java:120)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.TwoStoredFieldsConsumers.finishDocument(TwoStoredFieldsConsumers.java:65)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.DocFieldProcessor.finishDocument(DocFieldProcessor.java:267)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriterPerThread.updateDocument(DocumentsWriterPerThread.java:271)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.DocumentsWriter.updateDocument(DocumentsWriter.java:455)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1534)
> at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexWriter.updateDocument(IndexWriter.java:1507)
> at org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditor.addOrUpdate(LuceneIndexEditor.java:297)
> ... 40 more
>
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexExclusionQueryTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.184 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexLookupTest
> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProviderServiceTest
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.108 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexQueryTest
> Tests run: 19, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 6.436 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexTest
> Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.892 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LucenePropertyIndexTest
> Tests run: 47, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 12.024 sec
> Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.OakDirectoryTest
> Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.047 sec
I'll assume that's not new?
Best regards, Julian
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
Posted by Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1
Chetan Mehrotra
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Alex Parvulescu
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Amit Jain <am...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18 release is available at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.18/
>>
>> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>>
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.18/
>>
>> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
>> ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b.
>>
>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>
>> The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is:
>>
>> $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.18
>> ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18.
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>> My vote is +1
>>
>> Thanks
>> Amit
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
Posted by Alex Parvulescu <al...@gmail.com>.
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Amit Jain <am...@apache.org> wrote:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.18/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.18/
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b.
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/
>
> The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is:
>
> $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.18
> ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> My vote is +1
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
Tommaso
2015-07-31 11:01 GMT+02:00 Amit Jain <am...@apache.org>:
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18 release is available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.18/
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.18/
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b.
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/
>
> The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is:
>
> $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.18
> ef8e68edfef9b0c1470fe9de4d10d127f741633b
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.18
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> My vote is +1
>
> Thanks
> Amit
>