You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/09 02:00:39 UTC
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need. Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
-David
On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cool, thanks!
>
> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks
>> David for TCK report)
>>
>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with
>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases.
>>>
>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding the
>>> community.
>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we are
>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>>>
>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>>>
>>> JLouis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Hehe,
>>>>
>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to be
>>>> realistic.
>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better
>> and
>>>> more
>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move
>>> but
>>>> we
>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we just
>>>> need
>>>>> to
>>>>>> ask).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) so
>> we
>>>>> need
>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able to
>> do
>>>> so.
>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
>>> release
>>>>> IMO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java
>> EE
>>> 7.
>>>>> The
>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the
>>> end
>>>> of
>>>>>>> September.
>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>> another
>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> any comment?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
>> we
>>>>> have
>>>>>>> ATM,
>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Cool, will revert it when I pull everything over. Looks fairly simple.
-David
On Nov 7, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He has mail, no time to work but enough to say us. At least youd need to
> rever openjpa 2335 and check openjpa and tck are still passing
> Le 8 nov. 2013 07:43, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Note, wait-and-talk-to-mark is essentially option C as Mark isn't back
>> from JAX till next week.
>>
>> So far option B seems the dominant choice. I'll get started with that and
>> try and get some binaries up for tire-kicking then go to bed.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait
>> openjpa
>>> (or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
>>>
>>> I just dont want a blind release
>>> Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
>>>> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided
>> super
>>>> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
>>>> maintenance
>>>>> as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
>>>>> features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Latest option is not acceptable for me
>>>>>
>>>>> To summarize:
>>>>> A = 0
>>>>> B = +1
>>>>> C = -1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
>>>> they
>>>>>> won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
>>>>>> B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
>>>> done
>>>>>> this with other things before on rare occasion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Of course there is a 3rd option:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
>>>>>> that they'll need a release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
>>>> out
>>>>>> to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get
>> that
>>>>>> frequent release thing down.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So which option would have your vote?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
>>>>>> sucks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies
>>>> we
>>>>>> have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
>>>>>> people can beat on.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
>>>>>> 2.2.2?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
>>>> Mark
>>>>>> had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
>>>> need.
>>>>>> Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
>>>>>> (thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> David for TCK report)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production
>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>>>>>>>>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
>>>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
>>>>> regarding
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause
>>>> we
>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hehe,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer
>>>> to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> realistic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
>>>>> better
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
>>>>>> move
>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
>>>> (we
>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself
>>>> ;)
>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
>>>> able
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement
>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>> EE
>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
>>>>> validation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> September.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any comment?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
>>>> hack
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATM,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
He has mail, no time to work but enough to say us. At least youd need to
rever openjpa 2335 and check openjpa and tck are still passing
Le 8 nov. 2013 07:43, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Note, wait-and-talk-to-mark is essentially option C as Mark isn't back
> from JAX till next week.
>
> So far option B seems the dominant choice. I'll get started with that and
> try and get some binaries up for tire-kicking then go to bed.
>
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait
> openjpa
> > (or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
> >
> > I just dont want a blind release
> > Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
> >> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided
> super
> >> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
> >>
> >> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
> >>>
> >>> I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
> >> maintenance
> >>> as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
> >>> features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
> >>>
> >>> Latest option is not acceptable for me
> >>>
> >>> To summarize:
> >>> A = 0
> >>> B = +1
> >>> C = -1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> JLouis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
> >> they
> >>>> won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
> >>>>
> >>>> We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
> >>>>
> >>>> A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
> >>>> B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
> >> done
> >>>> this with other things before on rare occasion
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course there is a 3rd option:
> >>>>
> >>>> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
> >>>> that they'll need a release.
> >>>>
> >>>> I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
> >> out
> >>>> to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get
> that
> >>>> frequent release thing down.
> >>>>
> >>>> So which option would have your vote?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -David
> >>>>
> >>>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
> >>>> sucks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies
> >> we
> >>>> have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
> >>>> people can beat on.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
> >>>> 2.2.2?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
> >> Mark
> >>>> had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
> >> need.
> >>>> Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> >> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cool, thanks!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
> >>>> (thanks
> >>>>>>>>> David for TCK report)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production
> >>> with
> >>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
> >>>>>>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
> >>> releases.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
> >>> regarding
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> community.
> >>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause
> >> we
> >>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hehe,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer
> >> to
> >>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>> realistic.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> >> jeanouii@gmail.com
> >>>>
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> écrit
> >>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
> >>> better
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
> >>>> move
> >>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
> >> (we
> >>>> just
> >>>>>>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ask).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself
> >> ;)
> >>>> so
> >>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
> >> able
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> do
> >>>>>>>>>>> so.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
> >> just
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> IMO.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement
> >>> Java
> >>>>>>>>> EE
> >>>>>>>>>> 7.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
> >>> validation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> end
> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> September.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
> >>>>>>>>> another
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> any comment?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
> >> hack
> >>>>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATM,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> >>>>>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>> necessary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Louis
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Note, wait-and-talk-to-mark is essentially option C as Mark isn't back from JAX till next week.
So far option B seems the dominant choice. I'll get started with that and try and get some binaries up for tire-kicking then go to bed.
-David
On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait openjpa
> (or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
>
> I just dont want a blind release
> Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
>> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided super
>> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
>>
>> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
>>>
>>> I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
>> maintenance
>>> as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
>>> features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
>>>
>>> Latest option is not acceptable for me
>>>
>>> To summarize:
>>> A = 0
>>> B = +1
>>> C = -1
>>>
>>>
>>> JLouis
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
>> they
>>>> won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
>>>>
>>>> We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
>>>>
>>>> A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
>>>> B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
>> done
>>>> this with other things before on rare occasion
>>>>
>>>> Of course there is a 3rd option:
>>>>
>>>> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
>>>> that they'll need a release.
>>>>
>>>> I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
>> out
>>>> to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that
>>>> frequent release thing down.
>>>>
>>>> So which option would have your vote?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
>>>> sucks.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies
>> we
>>>> have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
>>>> people can beat on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
>>>> 2.2.2?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
>> Mark
>>>> had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
>> need.
>>>> Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -David
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
>>>> (thanks
>>>>>>>>> David for TCK report)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production
>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>>>>>>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
>>> releases.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
>>> regarding
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> community.
>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause
>> we
>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hehe,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer
>> to
>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> realistic.
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> écrit
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
>>> better
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
>>>> move
>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
>> (we
>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ask).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself
>> ;)
>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
>> able
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
>> just
>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>> IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement
>>> Java
>>>>>>>>> EE
>>>>>>>>>> 7.
>>>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
>>> validation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by
>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> September.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any comment?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
>> hack
>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ATM,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>>>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Good luck Mark! Thks if not obvious!
Le 11 nov. 2013 20:50, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> FYI (unrelated but still).
> Currently running the 'real' openjpa-2.3.0 release tasks
>
>
> Wish me luck...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 20:31
> > Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> >
> > Hello:
> >
> > Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 "plus" preview binaries are successful,
> > both
> > in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or
> OpenEJB
> > packages).
> >
> > Now our pressure is people asking "when TomEE 1.6.0" will officially
> > be
> > accessible from the TomEE download page.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker
> > <al...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Jean-Louis:
> >>
> >> I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for
> our
> >> QA & development teams to test ASAP and report any issue.
> >>
> >> I'll keep you updated
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> > <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback
> please,
> >>> whatever it is (work or not).
> >>> All information are available on the other thread.
> >>>
> >>> JLouis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/11/8 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>> > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different
> > build due
> >>> > to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded
> > version if it's
> >>> > being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were
> > 5mb
> >>> bigger
> >>> > due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that
> > make
> >>> the
> >>> > shaded OpenJPA jar.
> >>> >
> >>> > Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue
> > to
> >>> fail,
> >>> > so determination is required.
> >>> >
> >>> > Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get
> >>> non-bloated
> >>> > zips up.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > -David
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins
> > <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg
> > <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only
> > hits you
> >>> seldom.
> >>> > >> See OPENJPA-2335
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
> >>> > >> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis
> > changes. But
> >>> there
> >>> > might have been a good reason for those changes.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks.
> > After that I
> >>> will
> >>> > be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till
> >>> Sunday.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release
> > of OWB and
> >>> > OpenJPA immediately after that.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of
> > TomEE and
> >>> get
> >>> > some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process
> > that
> >>> really
> >>> > only starts once we have a build to try.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -David
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Louis
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
FYI (unrelated but still).
Currently running the 'real' openjpa-2.3.0 release tasks
Wish me luck...
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 11 November 2013, 20:31
> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>
> Hello:
>
> Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 "plus" preview binaries are successful,
> both
> in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB
> packages).
>
> Now our pressure is people asking "when TomEE 1.6.0" will officially
> be
> accessible from the TomEE download page.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker
> <al...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Jean-Louis:
>>
>> I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our
>> QA & development teams to test ASAP and report any issue.
>>
>> I'll keep you updated
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please,
>>> whatever it is (work or not).
>>> All information are available on the other thread.
>>>
>>> JLouis
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/11/8 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different
> build due
>>> > to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded
> version if it's
>>> > being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were
> 5mb
>>> bigger
>>> > due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that
> make
>>> the
>>> > shaded OpenJPA jar.
>>> >
>>> > Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue
> to
>>> fail,
>>> > so determination is required.
>>> >
>>> > Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get
>>> non-bloated
>>> > zips up.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -David
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins
> <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg
> <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only
> hits you
>>> seldom.
>>> > >> See OPENJPA-2335
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
>>> > >> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis
> changes. But
>>> there
>>> > might have been a good reason for those changes.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks.
> After that I
>>> will
>>> > be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till
>>> Sunday.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release
> of OWB and
>>> > OpenJPA immediately after that.
>>> > >
>>> > > I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
>>> > >
>>> > > Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of
> TomEE and
>>> get
>>> > some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
>>> > >
>>> > > Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process
> that
>>> really
>>> > only starts once we have a build to try.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > -David
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex. New binaires available for vote this week based on all latest
binaries and on Mark'work. Thank again Mark.
If nothing wrong happens we can expect the Vite being closed the upcoming
weekend and get binaries promoted just after.
Jlouis
Le 11 nov. 2013 20:32, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hello:
>
> Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 "plus" preview binaries are successful, both
> in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB
> packages).
>
> Now our pressure is people asking "when TomEE 1.6.0" will officially be
> accessible from the TomEE download page.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker <alex.m3tal@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Jean-Louis:
> >
> > I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our
> > QA & development teams to test ASAP and report any issue.
> >
> > I'll keep you updated
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hey guys,
> >>
> >> Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please,
> >> whatever it is (work or not).
> >> All information are available on the other thread.
> >>
> >> JLouis
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/8 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build
> due
> >> > to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if
> it's
> >> > being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb
> >> bigger
> >> > due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make
> >> the
> >> > shaded OpenJPA jar.
> >> >
> >> > Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to
> >> fail,
> >> > so determination is required.
> >> >
> >> > Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get
> >> non-bloated
> >> > zips up.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > -David
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you
> >> seldom.
> >> > >> See OPENJPA-2335
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
> >> > >> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But
> >> there
> >> > might have been a good reason for those changes.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I
> >> will
> >> > be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till
> >> Sunday.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB
> and
> >> > OpenJPA immediately after that.
> >> > >
> >> > > I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
> >> > >
> >> > > Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and
> >> get
> >> > some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
> >> > >
> >> > > Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that
> >> really
> >> > only starts once we have a build to try.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -David
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello:
Our tests with the TomEE 1.6.0 "plus" preview binaries are successful, both
in our manual and automated tests (we do not use any other TomEE or OpenEJB
packages).
Now our pressure is people asking "when TomEE 1.6.0" will officially be
accessible from the TomEE download page.
Thanks,
Alex.
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Jean-Louis:
>
> I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our
> QA & development teams to test ASAP and report any issue.
>
> I'll keep you updated
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please,
>> whatever it is (work or not).
>> All information are available on the other thread.
>>
>> JLouis
>>
>>
>> 2013/11/8 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due
>> > to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's
>> > being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb
>> bigger
>> > due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make
>> the
>> > shaded OpenJPA jar.
>> >
>> > Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to
>> fail,
>> > so determination is required.
>> >
>> > Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get
>> non-bloated
>> > zips up.
>> >
>> >
>> > -David
>> >
>> >
>> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you
>> seldom.
>> > >> See OPENJPA-2335
>> > >>
>> > >> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
>> > >> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But
>> there
>> > might have been a good reason for those changes.
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I
>> will
>> > be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till
>> Sunday.
>> > >>
>> > >> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and
>> > OpenJPA immediately after that.
>> > >
>> > > I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
>> > >
>> > > Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and
>> get
>> > some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
>> > >
>> > > Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that
>> really
>> > only starts once we have a build to try.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -David
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Jean-Louis:
I noticed it and I already pushed the information in my compagny for our QA
& development teams to test ASAP and report any issue.
I'll keep you updated
Thanks,
Alex
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please,
> whatever it is (work or not).
> All information are available on the other thread.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/8 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due
> > to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's
> > being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb
> bigger
> > due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make
> the
> > shaded OpenJPA jar.
> >
> > Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to
> fail,
> > so determination is required.
> >
> > Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get
> non-bloated
> > zips up.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you
> seldom.
> > >> See OPENJPA-2335
> > >>
> > >> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
> > >> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But
> there
> > might have been a good reason for those changes.
> > >>
> > >> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I
> will
> > be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till
> Sunday.
> > >>
> > >> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and
> > OpenJPA immediately after that.
> > >
> > > I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
> > >
> > > Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get
> > some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
> > >
> > > Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really
> > only starts once we have a build to try.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hey guys,
Preview binaries are up. Give it a try please and give feedback please,
whatever it is (work or not).
All information are available on the other thread.
JLouis
2013/11/8 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due
> to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's
> being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb bigger
> due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make the
> shaded OpenJPA jar.
>
> Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to fail,
> so determination is required.
>
> Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get non-bloated
> zips up.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >
> >> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom.
> >> See OPENJPA-2335
> >>
> >> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
> >> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there
> might have been a good reason for those changes.
> >>
> >> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will
> be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday.
> >>
> >> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and
> OpenJPA immediately after that.
> >
> > I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
> >
> > Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get
> some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
> >
> > Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really
> only starts once we have a build to try.
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
>
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Ended up having to split the OpenJPA source out to a different build due to shade plugin limitations -- you don't get the shaded version if it's being created in your same build. Our TomEE zips and tars were 5mb bigger due to having both he shaded OpenJPA and the individual jars that make the shaded OpenJPA jar.
Cleaned that up and finally got it into nexus -- deploys continue to fail, so determination is required.
Going to try and get some sleep. Jean-Louis staying on to get non-bloated zips up.
-David
On Nov 8, 2013, at 3:15 AM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom.
>> See OPENJPA-2335
>>
>> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
>> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have been a good reason for those changes.
>>
>> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday.
>>
>> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and OpenJPA immediately after that.
>
> I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
>
> Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
>
> Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really only starts once we have a build to try.
>
>
> -David
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom.
> See OPENJPA-2335
>
> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have been a good reason for those changes.
>
> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday.
>
> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and OpenJPA immediately after that.
I just finished reverting OPENJPA-2335 in the 1.6.0 branch.
Just need an OWB build than can put up a preview build of TomEE and get some sleep. Fine if it's not the final build.
Need to get a jump on TCK and the rest of the TomEE process that really only starts once we have a build to try.
-David
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Txs Ales.
Again, this was not intended as personally addressed to you.
I've seen you asked great questions and give feedback and we really appreciate that!
So you already started contributing in some form - and maybe it might become more in the futhre by helping us with docs, etc.
txs for your understanding,
LieGrue,
strub
>________________________________
> From: Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@tomee.apache.org; Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 12:12
>Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>
>
>Mark:
>Thanks, we'll consider that.
>Alex
>
>
>
>On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom.
>> See OPENJPA-2335
>>
>> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
>> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there
>> might have been a good reason for those changes.
>>
>> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be
>> able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday.
>>
>> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and
>> OpenJPA immediately after that.
>>
>> So Alex, if you need a TomEE release, why don't you just set the version
>> to some internal number and rolle your private intermediate release
>> yourself?
>> This is really not more than mvn clean source:jar deploy -DskipTests=true
>>
>> We should have the TomEE release final somewhen this week.
>>
>> David now runs a company with commercial support even, so if you need help
>> with an internal release then I bet he can help you.
>>
>> This is OpenSource, but we are no free candy gift shop.
>> We all take a lot of heart but also time and money into TomEE and other
>> ASF projects. But not because we are bored! We really use that stuff in our
>> own projects.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are very happy to get feedback. We are also very happy if tomee users
>> are happy. We also understand that some users have time constraints. But we
>> would be even happier if people don't see all the work we do as granted for
>> free.
>>
>>
>> don't take it personal, just needed to be said ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >________________________________
>> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>> >Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 6:58
>> >Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>> >
>> >
>> >Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait openjpa
>> >(or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
>> >
>> >I just dont want a blind release
>> >
>> >Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
>> >> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided
>> super
>> >> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Alex
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
>> >> maintenance
>> >> > as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
>> >> > features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
>> >> >
>> >> > Latest option is not acceptable for me
>> >> >
>> >> > To summarize:
>> >> > A = 0
>> >> > B = +1
>> >> > C = -1
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > JLouis
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >> > > So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
>> >> they
>> >> > > won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
>> >> > > B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
>> >> done
>> >> > > this with other things before on rare occasion
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Of course there is a 3rd option:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead
>> time
>> >> > > that they'll need a release.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
>> >> out
>> >> > > to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get
>> that
>> >> > > frequent release thing down.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > So which option would have your vote?
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > -David
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty
>> much
>> >> > > sucks.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> ________________________________
>> >> > > >> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>> >> > > >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
>> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot
>> dependencies
>> >> we
>> >> > > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least
>> something
>> >> > > people can beat on.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with
>> using
>> >> > > 2.2.2?
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> -David
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <
>> david.blevins@gmail.com>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
>> >> Mark
>> >> > > had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
>> >> need.
>> >> > > Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> -David
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> >> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>>> Cool, thanks!
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>> JLouis
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
>> >> > > (thanks
>> >> > > >>>>> David for TCK report)
>> >> > > >>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> >> > > >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> >> > > >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> >> > > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> >> > > >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> >> > > >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in
>> production
>> >> > with
>> >> > > >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>> >> > > >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
>> >> > releases.
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
>> >> > regarding
>> >> > > the
>> >> > > >>>>>> community.
>> >> > > >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months
>> cause
>> >> we
>> >> > > are
>> >> > > >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>> JLouis
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>> Hehe,
>> >> > > >>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i
>> prefer
>> >> to
>> >> > > be
>> >> > > >>>>>>> realistic.
>> >> > > >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>> >> jeanouii@gmail.com
>> >> > >
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > >>>>>> écrit
>> >> > > >>>>>>> :
>> >> > > >>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
>> >> > better
>> >> > > >>>>> and
>> >> > > >>>>>>> more
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys
>> doesn't
>> >> > > move
>> >> > > >>>>>> but
>> >> > > >>>>>>> we
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
>> >> (we
>> >> > > just
>> >> > > >>>>>>> need
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> to
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> ask).
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs
>> themself
>> >> ;)
>> >> > > so
>> >> > > >>>>> we
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> need
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
>> >> able
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > >>>>> do
>> >> > > >>>>>>> so.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
>> >> just
>> >> > > >>>>>> release
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> IMO.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to
>> implement
>> >> > Java
>> >> > > >>>>> EE
>> >> > > >>>>>> 7.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> The
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
>> >> > validation.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have
>> it by
>> >> > the
>> >> > > >>>>>> end
>> >> > > >>>>>>> of
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> September.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can
>> release
>> >> > > >>>>> another
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency
>> updates.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> any comment?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
>> >> hack
>> >> > > >>>>> we
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> have
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> ATM,
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <
>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>> a
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and
>> it's
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> necessary
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> in
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> my
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> --
>> >> > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> > > >>>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>> --
>> >> > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> > > >>>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>>
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>>
>> >> > > >>>> --
>> >> > > >>>> Jean-Louis
>> >> > > >>>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Jean-Louis
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
Mark:
Thanks, we'll consider that.
Alex
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom.
> See OPENJPA-2335
>
> I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
> It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there
> might have been a good reason for those changes.
>
> I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be
> able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday.
>
> I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and
> OpenJPA immediately after that.
>
> So Alex, if you need a TomEE release, why don't you just set the version
> to some internal number and rolle your private intermediate release
> yourself?
> This is really not more than mvn clean source:jar deploy -DskipTests=true
>
> We should have the TomEE release final somewhen this week.
>
> David now runs a company with commercial support even, so if you need help
> with an internal release then I bet he can help you.
>
> This is OpenSource, but we are no free candy gift shop.
> We all take a lot of heart but also time and money into TomEE and other
> ASF projects. But not because we are bored! We really use that stuff in our
> own projects.
>
>
>
> We are very happy to get feedback. We are also very happy if tomee users
> are happy. We also understand that some users have time constraints. But we
> would be even happier if people don't see all the work we do as granted for
> free.
>
>
> don't take it personal, just needed to be said ;)
>
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> >________________________________
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> >Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 6:58
> >Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> >
> >
> >Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait openjpa
> >(or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
> >
> >I just dont want a blind release
> >
> >Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
> >> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided
> super
> >> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
> >>
> >> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
> >> >
> >> > I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
> >> maintenance
> >> > as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
> >> > features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
> >> >
> >> > Latest option is not acceptable for me
> >> >
> >> > To summarize:
> >> > A = 0
> >> > B = +1
> >> > C = -1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > JLouis
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
> >> they
> >> > > won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
> >> > >
> >> > > We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
> >> > >
> >> > > A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
> >> > > B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
> >> done
> >> > > this with other things before on rare occasion
> >> > >
> >> > > Of course there is a 3rd option:
> >> > >
> >> > > C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead
> time
> >> > > that they'll need a release.
> >> > >
> >> > > I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
> >> out
> >> > > to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get
> that
> >> > > frequent release thing down.
> >> > >
> >> > > So which option would have your vote?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -David
> >> > >
> >> > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty
> much
> >> > > sucks.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> ________________________________
> >> > > >> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> >> > > >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot
> dependencies
> >> we
> >> > > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least
> something
> >> > > people can beat on.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with
> using
> >> > > 2.2.2?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -David
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <
> david.blevins@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
> >> Mark
> >> > > had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
> >> need.
> >> > > Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> -David
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> >> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Cool, thanks!
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> JLouis
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
> >> > > (thanks
> >> > > >>>>> David for TCK report)
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >> > > >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >> > > >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >> > > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >> > > >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >> > > >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in
> production
> >> > with
> >> > > >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
> >> > > >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
> >> > releases.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
> >> > regarding
> >> > > the
> >> > > >>>>>> community.
> >> > > >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months
> cause
> >> we
> >> > > are
> >> > > >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> JLouis
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> Hehe,
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i
> prefer
> >> to
> >> > > be
> >> > > >>>>>>> realistic.
> >> > > >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> >> jeanouii@gmail.com
> >> > >
> >> > > a
> >> > > >>>>>> écrit
> >> > > >>>>>>> :
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
> >> > better
> >> > > >>>>> and
> >> > > >>>>>>> more
> >> > > >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys
> doesn't
> >> > > move
> >> > > >>>>>> but
> >> > > >>>>>>> we
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
> >> (we
> >> > > just
> >> > > >>>>>>> need
> >> > > >>>>>>>> to
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> ask).
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs
> themself
> >> ;)
> >> > > so
> >> > > >>>>> we
> >> > > >>>>>>>> need
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
> >> able
> >> > > to
> >> > > >>>>> do
> >> > > >>>>>>> so.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
> >> just
> >> > > >>>>>> release
> >> > > >>>>>>>> IMO.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to
> implement
> >> > Java
> >> > > >>>>> EE
> >> > > >>>>>> 7.
> >> > > >>>>>>>> The
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
> >> > validation.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have
> it by
> >> > the
> >> > > >>>>>> end
> >> > > >>>>>>> of
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> September.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can
> release
> >> > > >>>>> another
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency
> updates.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> any comment?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
> >> hack
> >> > > >>>>> we
> >> > > >>>>>>>> have
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> ATM,
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <
> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> >> > > >>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>> a
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and
> it's
> >> > > >>>>>>>> necessary
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> in
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>> my
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>> --
> >> > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >> > > >>>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>> --
> >> > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >> > > >>>>>>
> >> > > >>>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> --
> >> > > >>>> Jean-Louis
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Louis
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
The issue with openjpa-2.3.0 is a regression which only hits you seldom.
See OPENJPA-2335
I found it when I tried to use @OrderColumn.
It would be easy to fix this by rolling back Pinakis changes. But there might have been a good reason for those changes.
I'm on a conf today and have to deliver 2 more talks. After that I will be able to work on that stuff again and hope I get this fixed till Sunday.
I suggest Romain and I fix OpenJPA and we start a release of OWB and OpenJPA immediately after that.
So Alex, if you need a TomEE release, why don't you just set the version to some internal number and rolle your private intermediate release yourself?
This is really not more than mvn clean source:jar deploy -DskipTests=true
We should have the TomEE release final somewhen this week.
David now runs a company with commercial support even, so if you need help with an internal release then I bet he can help you.
This is OpenSource, but we are no free candy gift shop.
We all take a lot of heart but also time and money into TomEE and other ASF projects. But not because we are bored! We really use that stuff in our own projects.
We are very happy to get feedback. We are also very happy if tomee users are happy. We also understand that some users have time constraints. But we would be even happier if people don't see all the work we do as granted for free.
don't take it personal, just needed to be said ;)
LieGrue,
strub
>________________________________
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, 8 November 2013, 6:58
>Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>
>
>Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait openjpa
>(or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
>
>I just dont want a blind release
>
>Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
>> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided super
>> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
>>
>> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
>>
>> Thanks
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
>> >
>> > I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
>> maintenance
>> > as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
>> > features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
>> >
>> > Latest option is not acceptable for me
>> >
>> > To summarize:
>> > A = 0
>> > B = +1
>> > C = -1
>> >
>> >
>> > JLouis
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
>> they
>> > > won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
>> > >
>> > > We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
>> > >
>> > > A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
>> > > B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
>> done
>> > > this with other things before on rare occasion
>> > >
>> > > Of course there is a 3rd option:
>> > >
>> > > C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
>> > > that they'll need a release.
>> > >
>> > > I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
>> out
>> > > to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that
>> > > frequent release thing down.
>> > >
>> > > So which option would have your vote?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -David
>> > >
>> > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
>> > > sucks.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >> ________________________________
>> > > >> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>> > > >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
>> > > >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies
>> we
>> > > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
>> > > people can beat on.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
>> > > 2.2.2?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -David
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
>> Mark
>> > > had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
>> need.
>> > > Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> -David
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> Cool, thanks!
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> JLouis
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
>> > > (thanks
>> > > >>>>> David for TCK report)
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> > > >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> > > >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> > > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> > > >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> > > >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production
>> > with
>> > > >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>> > > >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
>> > releases.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
>> > regarding
>> > > the
>> > > >>>>>> community.
>> > > >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause
>> we
>> > > are
>> > > >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> JLouis
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> Hehe,
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer
>> to
>> > > be
>> > > >>>>>>> realistic.
>> > > >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>> jeanouii@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > a
>> > > >>>>>> écrit
>> > > >>>>>>> :
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
>> > better
>> > > >>>>> and
>> > > >>>>>>> more
>> > > >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
>> > > move
>> > > >>>>>> but
>> > > >>>>>>> we
>> > > >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
>> (we
>> > > just
>> > > >>>>>>> need
>> > > >>>>>>>> to
>> > > >>>>>>>>> ask).
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself
>> ;)
>> > > so
>> > > >>>>> we
>> > > >>>>>>>> need
>> > > >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
>> able
>> > > to
>> > > >>>>> do
>> > > >>>>>>> so.
>> > > >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
>> just
>> > > >>>>>> release
>> > > >>>>>>>> IMO.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> > > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> > > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> > > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> > > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement
>> > Java
>> > > >>>>> EE
>> > > >>>>>> 7.
>> > > >>>>>>>> The
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
>> > validation.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by
>> > the
>> > > >>>>>> end
>> > > >>>>>>> of
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> September.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>> > > >>>>> another
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> any comment?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
>> hack
>> > > >>>>> we
>> > > >>>>>>>> have
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> ATM,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>> > > >>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>> > > >>>>>>>>> a
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>> > > >>>>>>>> necessary
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> in
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> my
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>> --
>> > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis
>> > > >>>>>>
>> > > >>>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> --
>> > > >>>> Jean-Louis
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jean-Louis
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Ping Mark to know what is the openjpa regression. If blocking wait openjpa
(or do the fix), if not B (or with the fix in our fork)...
I just dont want a blind release
Le 7 nov. 2013 22:38, "Alex The Rocker" <al...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
> OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided super
> fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
>
> Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
>
> Thanks
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
> >
> > I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release
> maintenance
> > as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
> > features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
> >
> > Latest option is not acceptable for me
> >
> > To summarize:
> > A = 0
> > B = +1
> > C = -1
> >
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> >
> > 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or
> they
> > > won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
> > >
> > > We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
> > >
> > > A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
> > > B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've
> done
> > > this with other things before on rare occasion
> > >
> > > Of course there is a 3rd option:
> > >
> > > C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
> > > that they'll need a release.
> > >
> > > I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys
> out
> > > to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that
> > > frequent release thing down.
> > >
> > > So which option would have your vote?
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
> > > sucks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> ________________________________
> > > >> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > > >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> > > >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
> > > >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies
> we
> > > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
> > > people can beat on.
> > > >>
> > > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
> > > 2.2.2?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -David
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne.
> Mark
> > > had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we
> need.
> > > Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -David
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Cool, thanks!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> JLouis
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
> > > (thanks
> > > >>>>> David for TCK report)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production
> > with
> > > >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
> > > >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
> > releases.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
> > regarding
> > > the
> > > >>>>>> community.
> > > >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause
> we
> > > are
> > > >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> JLouis
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Hehe,
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer
> to
> > > be
> > > >>>>>>> realistic.
> > > >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> jeanouii@gmail.com
> > >
> > > a
> > > >>>>>> écrit
> > > >>>>>>> :
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
> > better
> > > >>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>> more
> > > >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> JLouis
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
> > > move
> > > >>>>>> but
> > > >>>>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO
> (we
> > > just
> > > >>>>>>> need
> > > >>>>>>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>>> ask).
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself
> ;)
> > > so
> > > >>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>>> need
> > > >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not
> able
> > > to
> > > >>>>> do
> > > >>>>>>> so.
> > > >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's
> just
> > > >>>>>> release
> > > >>>>>>>> IMO.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement
> > Java
> > > >>>>> EE
> > > >>>>>> 7.
> > > >>>>>>>> The
> > > >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
> > validation.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by
> > the
> > > >>>>>> end
> > > >>>>>>> of
> > > >>>>>>>>>> September.
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
> > > >>>>> another
> > > >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> any comment?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly
> hack
> > > >>>>> we
> > > >>>>>>>> have
> > > >>>>>>>>>> ATM,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> > > >>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>> a
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
> > > >>>>>>>> necessary
> > > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> my
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Jean-Louis
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis
> >
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 for option B, and I like the idea of a 1.6.1 maintenance release with
OpenJPA final in it, that's a perfect one if option B can be provided super
fast (this week at least as a release candidate)
Otherwise it'll amount to option C for us :(
Thanks
Alex
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
>
> I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release maintenance
> as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
> features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
>
> Latest option is not acceptable for me
>
> To summarize:
> A = 0
> B = +1
> C = -1
>
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or they
> > won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
> >
> > We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
> >
> > A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
> > B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've done
> > this with other things before on rare occasion
> >
> > Of course there is a 3rd option:
> >
> > C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
> > that they'll need a release.
> >
> > I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys out
> > to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that
> > frequent release thing down.
> >
> > So which option would have your vote?
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> >
> > > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
> > sucks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
> > >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we
> > have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
> > people can beat on.
> > >>
> > >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
> > 2.2.2?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -David
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark
> > had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need.
> > Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -David
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Cool, thanks!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> JLouis
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
> > (thanks
> > >>>>> David for TCK report)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production
> with
> > >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
> > >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real
> releases.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated
> regarding
> > the
> > >>>>>> community.
> > >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we
> > are
> > >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> JLouis
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hehe,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to
> > be
> > >>>>>>> realistic.
> > >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeanouii@gmail.com
> >
> > a
> > >>>>>> écrit
> > >>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do
> better
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>> more
> > >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> JLouis
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
> > move
> > >>>>>> but
> > >>>>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we
> > just
> > >>>>>>> need
> > >>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>> ask).
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;)
> > so
> > >>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>> need
> > >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able
> > to
> > >>>>> do
> > >>>>>>> so.
> > >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
> > >>>>>> release
> > >>>>>>>> IMO.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement
> Java
> > >>>>> EE
> > >>>>>> 7.
> > >>>>>>>> The
> > >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean
> validation.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by
> the
> > >>>>>> end
> > >>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>> September.
> > >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
> > >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
> > >>>>> another
> > >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> any comment?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
> > >>>>> we
> > >>>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>>>> ATM,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> > >>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
> > >>>>>>>> necessary
> > >>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Jean-Louis
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Need to check whereas the option A is possible.
I'm for B, but I would add the following: release 1.6.1 release maintenance
as soon as OpenJPA gets released. Release maintenance only, no new
features. Only big bugfixes and dep updates.
Latest option is not acceptable for me
To summarize:
A = 0
B = +1
C = -1
JLouis
2013/11/7 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or they
> won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
>
> We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
>
> A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
> B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've done
> this with other things before on rare occasion
>
> Of course there is a 3rd option:
>
> C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time
> that they'll need a release.
>
> I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys out
> to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that
> frequent release thing down.
>
> So which option would have your vote?
>
>
> -David
>
> On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much
> sucks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
> >> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
> >> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
> >>
> >>
> >> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we
> have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
> people can beat on.
> >>
> >> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using
> 2.2.2?
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark
> had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need.
> Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -David
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Cool, thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
> >>>>
> >>>> JLouis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now
> (thanks
> >>>>> David for TCK report)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with
> >>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
> >>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding
> the
> >>>>>> community.
> >>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we
> are
> >>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hehe,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to
> be
> >>>>>>> realistic.
> >>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com>
> a
> >>>>>> écrit
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>> more
> >>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't
> move
> >>>>>> but
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we
> just
> >>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> ask).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;)
> so
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> need
> >>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able
> to
> >>>>> do
> >>>>>>> so.
> >>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
> >>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>> IMO.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java
> >>>>> EE
> >>>>>> 7.
> >>>>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the
> >>>>>> end
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>> September.
> >>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
> >>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
> >>>>> another
> >>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> any comment?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>> ATM,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> >>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
> >>>>>>>> necessary
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Jean-Louis
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
So we need to start getting builds for Alex, Tim, Judah and crew or they won't be able to move forward with TomEE.
We just have the OpenJPA issue to deal with. We have two options:
A. Release with OpenJPA 2.2.2
B. Release with OpenJPA 2.3.0 "pre" build of our creation -- we've done this with other things before on rare occasion
Of course there is a 3rd option:
C. Forget those guys, they should give us more than 4 months lead time that they'll need a release.
I personally don't feel good about option #3. Would hang those guys out to dry and send a very bad message to other users. We need to get that frequent release thing down.
So which option would have your vote?
-David
On Nov 3, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much sucks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ________________________________
>> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>> Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
>> Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>>
>>
>> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something people can beat on.
>>
>> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using 2.2.2?
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need. Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>>>
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>>>>
>>>> JLouis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks
>>>>> David for TCK report)
>>>>>
>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with
>>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding the
>>>>>> community.
>>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we are
>>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hehe,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to be
>>>>>>> realistic.
>>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a
>>>>>> écrit
>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better
>>>>> and
>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move
>>>>>> but
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we just
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> ask).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) so
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able to
>>>>> do
>>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> IMO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java
>>>>> EE
>>>>>> 7.
>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the
>>>>>> end
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> September.
>>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> any comment?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> ATM,
>>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>>>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
openjpa-2.2.2 uses a hardcoded asm-3.2 dependency. That pretty much sucks.
>________________________________
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>To: dev@tomee.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:25
>Subject: Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
>
>
>Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something people can beat on.
>
>In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using 2.2.2?
>
>
>-David
>
>
>On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need. Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Cool, thanks!
>>>
>>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>>>
>>> JLouis
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks
>>>> David for TCK report)
>>>>
>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with
>>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding the
>>>>> community.
>>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we are
>>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>>>>>
>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hehe,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to be
>>>>>> realistic.
>>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a
>>>>> écrit
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better
>>>> and
>>>>>> more
>>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move
>>>>> but
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we just
>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> ask).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) so
>>>> we
>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able to
>>>> do
>>>>>> so.
>>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> IMO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java
>>>> EE
>>>>> 7.
>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the
>>>>> end
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> September.
>>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>>>> another
>>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> any comment?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
>>>> we
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> ATM,
>>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi David,
It doesnt support asm4 + several bugfixes (on auditor, criteria api,
dictionnary...) needed by several people.
Le 4 nov. 2013 03:25, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we
> have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something
> people can beat on.
>
> In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using 2.2.2?
>
>
> -David
>
> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark had
> volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need.
> Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
> >
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Cool, thanks!
> >>
> >> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
> >>
> >> JLouis
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks
> >>> David for TCK report)
> >>>
> >>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with
> >>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
> >>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases.
> >>>>
> >>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding
> the
> >>>> community.
> >>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we are
> >>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
> >>>>
> >>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
> >>>>
> >>>> JLouis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hehe,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to be
> >>>>> realistic.
> >>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a
> >>>> écrit
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better
> >>> and
> >>>>> more
> >>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move
> >>>> but
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we just
> >>>>> need
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> ask).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) so
> >>> we
> >>>>>> need
> >>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able to
> >>> do
> >>>>> so.
> >>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
> >>>> release
> >>>>>> IMO.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java
> >>> EE
> >>>> 7.
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the
> >>>> end
> >>>>> of
> >>>>>>>> September.
> >>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
> >>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
> >>> another
> >>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> any comment?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JLouis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
> >>> we
> >>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>> ATM,
> >>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> >>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> >>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> >>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> >>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
> >>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
> >>>>>> necessary
> >>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
> >
>
>
Re: Time to release TomEE 1.6.0
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
Branched in hopes we can kick out some of the snapshot dependencies we have and get a release candidate up mid week -- or at least something people can beat on.
In terms of OpenJPA specifically, what is the exact issue with using 2.2.2?
-David
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:00 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I pinged a few people on the OpenJPA release prior to JavaOne. Mark had volunteered some personal time for doing the OpenJPA release we need. Mark, that still something you're up for doing?
>
>
> -David
>
> On Sep 5, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks!
>>
>> Will send a mail to dev@openwebbeans.
>>
>> JLouis
>>
>>
>> 2013/9/5 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> FYI: TCK and build are back to green so only the dep issue now (thanks
>>> David for TCK report)
>>>
>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> I know that almost everybody is currently working in production with
>>>> SNAPSHOTS (kinda releases for OpenEJB).
>>>> But sometimes, it's also good to take time to product real releases.
>>>>
>>>> But, fully agree with you. Right now it a bit complicated regarding the
>>>> community.
>>>> Hopefully, that should be better in coming weeks, months cause we are
>>>> seeing more and more contributors on the mailing lists.
>>>>
>>>> So they should join the committers' list of the project.
>>>>
>>>> JLouis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Hehe,
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope so too but *today* it seems too complicated so i prefer to be
>>>>> realistic.
>>>>> Le 4 sept. 2013 15:48, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Without moving from one side to the opposite, we can IMO do better
>>> and
>>>>> more
>>>>>> frequent releases, at least with bugfixes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arquillian update/fix is done for weeks, OpenJPA guys doesn't move
>>>> but
>>>>> we
>>>>>>> can fork even if that's a bit sad, OWB is not an issue IMO (we just
>>>>> need
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> ask).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However our TCKs report is broken (report, not TCKs themself ;) so
>>> we
>>>>>> need
>>>>>>> it to be fixed before any release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> About maintenance releases: I think it is clear we are not able to
>>> do
>>>>> so.
>>>>>>> So when somebody able to release is ready to do it, let's just
>>>> release
>>>>>> IMO.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/9/4 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @tiklu TomEE depends on other implementations to implement Java
>>> EE
>>>> 7.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>> work has already started with openwebbeans and bean validation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well regarding our 1.6.0 release, I would like to have it by the
>>>> end
>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> September.
>>>>>>>> Any updates on Arquillian, OpenWebBeans and OpenJPA?
>>>>>>>> Are they absolutely necessary?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If API changes, ok if just a bugfix, mais be we can release
>>> another
>>>>>>>> maintenance release next month with new dependency updates.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> any comment?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> JLouis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/7/18 tiklu ganguly <ti...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and when are you guys planning support for JavaEE 7?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> PS we need arquillian 1.1.1.Final too to remove an ugly hack
>>> we
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> ATM,
>>>>>>>>>> normally should be here at the end of the week
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>>>>>>>>>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>>>>>>>>>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>>>>>>>>>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/7/16 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We are still waiting for owb 1.2.1 and openjpa 2.3 :(
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 16 juil. 2013 15:26, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <
>>>>>> jeanouii@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> was wondering if we could release TomEE 1.6.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any other releases we have to wait for?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody has important things in progress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's been a very long time since latest release and it's
>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion to get it out soon now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>