You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openmeetings.apache.org by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com> on 2012/07/19 13:45:13 UTC
Openmeetings release approval by Incubator PMC Was: Incubation state
transitions and stuck projects (Was: February report review)
[cc-ed to dev@ and changed the subject]
Hello Jukka,
You wrote:
> IP clearance -> No release: Openmeetings
The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@
list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC
approval? Can we proceed with wider distribution?
[1] http://markmail.org/message/azenwwlcfhnxmysf
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> My suggestion is to ask the podlings now in category 2 to report again
>> in May on their progress on the identified blockers. If there's been
>> no measurable progress by then, we'll dig deeper to see what we can
>> do. Podlings reporting in other months can be picked up for a similar
>> oversight cycle over the coming months. By July we should then have a
>> pretty accurate record of progress throughout the entire Incubator,
>> including a clear list of podlings that are stuck and need help.
>
> Following up on this, here's a quick graph I put together when
> preparing for this month's board report: http://twitpic.com/a7o368
>
> The graph shows how podlings have moved from one (subjective)
> categorization to another (or to graduation/retirement) between their
> two scheduled reports in the February-July time frame (I'm only
> counting projects that were already past their first three months at
> the Incubator). The edge width is proportional to the number of
> podlings that made that particular "state change". The Graphviz source
> of the graph is included at the end of this message.
>
> The overall picture looks pretty good. We have strong movement towards
> graduation, and so far no regressions from the "ready to graduate"
> state back to low activity or diversity.
>
> Here's the list of projects that stayed at the same category from one
> report to the next:
>
> IP clearance: Amber
> No release: Any23, Bloodhound, Cordova, JSPWiki
> Low activity: Ambari, AWF, EasyAnt, Kitty, Nuvem, PhotArk, Kato
> Low diversity: Airavata, Bigtop, Chukwa, Tashi
> Ready to graduate: Flume, Lucene.NET, NPanday
>
> The IP clearance issue in Amber seems to be finally resolved ( LEGAL-134).
>
> The release issues are being resolved, as Any23 has just passed a
> release vote and I've seen good progress towards an Apache release in
> both Cordova and JSPWiki. I don't know the release status in
> Bloodhound.
>
> The low activity projects remain a problem though there are a few
> projects who've managed to escape that trap. For the rest we need to
> find solutions. Kato was already retired, and AWF and Kitty getting
> there. EasyAnt might go the subproject route, and PhotArk has been
> showing increased activity lately. I don't know what's going on in
> Ambari or Nuvem.
>
> The low diversity "state" is a bit vague catchall category for
> projects that don't yet feel ready to graduate. I'm not too concerned
> if some projects take a bit longer there as long as they don't regress
> to low activity. Once a project has hit the "low diversity" category,
> chances are quite high that it'll end up graduating.
>
> The podlings that were "ready to graduate" for more than three months
> are a bit mixed story. Flume already graduated and Lucene.NET is just
> about to, but NPanday looks to be in trouble as activity there seems
> to have plummeted since May for some reason.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
> ----
>
> /*
> IP clearance -> IP clearance: Amber
> IP clearance -> No release: Openmeetings
> No release -> No release: Any23, Bloodhound, Cordova, JSPWiki
> No release -> Low diversity: Mesos
> No release -> Ready to graduate: Clerezza, DirectMemory,
> OpenOffice, Stanbol
> Low activity -> Low activity: Ambari, AWF, EasyAnt, Kitty,
> Nuvem, PhotArk, Kato
> Low activity -> Retire: Kalumet, Zeta Components
> Low activity -> No release: Celix, VXQuery
> Low activity -> Low diversity: SIS
> Low activity -> Ready to graduate: Wink
> Low diversity -> Low activity: Droids, ODF Toolkit
> Low diversity -> Low diversity: Airavata, Bigtop, Chukwa, Tashi
> Low diversity -> No release: S4, Wave
> Low diversity -> Ready to graduate: Etch, HCatalog, Isis, Kafka,
> Oozie, VCL, Wookie
> Low diversity -> Graduate: Hama, MRUnit
> Ready to graduate -> Ready to graduate: Flume, Lucene.NET, NPanday
> Ready to graduate -> Graduate: Accumulo, Jena, ManifoldCF,
> OpenNLP, RAT, Rave, Sqoop
> */
>
> digraph Incubator {
> /* { rank = same; "IP clearance"; "no release"; "low activity"; "low
> diversity" } */
> { rank = same; "graduated"; "retired" }
> "IP clearance" -> "IP clearance" [penwidth=1];
> "IP clearance" -> "no release" [penwidth=1];
> "no release" -> "no release" [penwidth=4];
> "no release" -> "low diversity" [penwidth=1];
> "no release" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=4];
> "low activity" -> "low activity" [penwidth=7];
> "low activity" -> "retired" [penwidth=3];
> "low activity" -> "no release" [penwidth=2];
> "low activity" -> "low diversity" [penwidth=1];
> "low activity" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=1];
> "low diversity" -> "low diversity" [penwidth=4];
> "low diversity" -> "low activity" [penwidth=2];
> "low diversity" -> "no release" [penwidth=2];
> "low diversity" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=7];
> "low diversity" -> "graduated" [penwidth=2];
> "ready to graduate" -> "ready to graduate" [penwidth=3];
> "ready to graduate" -> "graduated" [penwidth=7];
> }
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
Re: Openmeetings release approval by Incubator PMC Was: Incubation
state transitions and stuck projects (Was: February report review)
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alexei Fedotov
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@
> list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC
> approval? Can we proceed with wider distribution?
See http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
for the Incubator policy on releases. You're almost done, just an
extra approval vote on general@ is still needed (and since you already
have two mentor +1s, you only need one more IPMC member to vote for
the release).
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: Openmeetings release approval by Incubator PMC Was: Incubation
state transitions and stuck projects (Was: February report review)
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Alexei Fedotov
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The release vote have successfully passed and forwarded to general@
> list [1]. What should be our next step? Have we got Incubator PMC
> approval? Can we proceed with wider distribution?
See http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
for the Incubator policy on releases. You're almost done, just an
extra approval vote on general@ is still needed (and since you already
have two mentor +1s, you only need one more IPMC member to vote for
the release).
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org