making a sandbox release

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

Although I think we're set up to do individual sandbox project releases, for the
first one, I'm thinking of doing it like we use to - as a collection of add-ons.

I'm thinking we should do this soon.  I can serve as release manager for this,
but am more than happy if someone else wants to.

What additional (if any) new sandbox projects are ready to be added to the set
of released sandbox projects for this go-around?

-Marshall

Re: making a sandbox release

[Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>]

On 1/17/2011 11:11 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
>
> 2011/1/17 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>
>
>> Although I think we're set up to do individual sandbox project releases,
>> for the
>> first one, I'm thinking of doing it like we use to - as a collection of
>> add-ons.
>>
> I'm +1 for releasing sandbox as a whole for this first TLP one, then go
> separately with each project.
>
>
>> I'm thinking we should do this soon.  I can serve as release manager for
>> this,
>> but am more than happy if someone else wants to.
>>
> I can do it (better if I can count on your guidance)
>
>

I'm glad to help :-).  Each time the website docs for releasing get improved as
a good side effect, too :-)
>> What additional (if any) new sandbox projects are ready to be added to the
>> set
>> of released sandbox projects for this go-around?
>>
> It'd be good to have the parent-pom 2 release on repos before so that we can
> remove some unnecessary POM lines from sandbox projects; I may be wrong but
> it seems to me we voted for the parent-pom 2 release but we didn't actually
> deploy it, did I miss anything?

parent-pom-2 is on maven central, ready for use, since 11 January.
> In the meantime I'd align the sandbox-osgi-runtime with the new components
> (SolrCAS and RDFCasConsumer) so that it can be included too.
>

OK.  -Marshall
> Cheers,
> Tommaso
>
>
>
>
>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>>

Re: making a sandbox release

[Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>]

Hi Marshall,

2011/1/17 Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>

> Although I think we're set up to do individual sandbox project releases,
> for the
> first one, I'm thinking of doing it like we use to - as a collection of
> add-ons.
>

I'm +1 for releasing sandbox as a whole for this first TLP one, then go
separately with each project.


>
> I'm thinking we should do this soon.  I can serve as release manager for
> this,
> but am more than happy if someone else wants to.
>

I can do it (better if I can count on your guidance)


>
> What additional (if any) new sandbox projects are ready to be added to the
> set
> of released sandbox projects for this go-around?
>

It'd be good to have the parent-pom 2 release on repos before so that we can
remove some unnecessary POM lines from sandbox projects; I may be wrong but
it seems to me we voted for the parent-pom 2 release but we didn't actually
deploy it, did I miss anything?

In the meantime I'd align the sandbox-osgi-runtime with the new components
(SolrCAS and RDFCasConsumer) so that it can be included too.

Cheers,
Tommaso





>
> -Marshall
>
>
>