You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by "Chesnay Schepler (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/03/16 13:57:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-16619) Misleading SlotManagerImpl logging for slot reports of unknown task manager

Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-16619:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Misleading SlotManagerImpl logging for slot reports of unknown task manager
                 Key: FLINK-16619
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16619
             Project: Flink
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Runtime / Coordination
    Affects Versions: 1.10.0
            Reporter: Chesnay Schepler


If the SlotManager receives a slot report from an unknown task manager it logs 2 messages:
{code}
public boolean reportSlotStatus(InstanceID instanceId, SlotReport slotReport) {
	[...]
	LOG.debug("Received slot report from instance {}: {}.", instanceId, slotReport);

	TaskManagerRegistration taskManagerRegistration = taskManagerRegistrations.get(instanceId);

	if (null != taskManagerRegistration) {
		[...]
	} else {
		LOG.debug("Received slot report for unknown task manager with instance id {}. Ignoring this report.", instanceId);
		[...]
	}
}
{code}

This leads to misleading output since it appears like the slot manager received 2 separate slot reports, with the first being for a known instance, the latter for an unknown one. This cost some time as I couldn't figure out why the "latter" report was suddenly being rejected.

I propose moving the first debug message into the non-null branch.

[~trohrmann] WDYT?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)