You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by Minho Kim <mi...@apache.org> on 2015/06/15 16:54:49 UTC

Regarding the article of Hama

Hi all,

You heard that Hama-0.7.0 had been released.
I accordingly have written article about Hama.
The article explains a graph package of Hama as well as an overview of it,
with results of the benchmark.
The following is a link of the article.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q5Of6MbSRe_TM1G_WIODzMb9Owc-_TXg332rbiJjB_4/edit?usp=sharing

Let me know any idea after read it. Of cource tell me if there are wrong.

Thanks all.


--
Best regards,
Minho Kim

Re: Regarding the article of Hama

Posted by Behroz Sikander <be...@gmail.com>.

+1. Good to here that Hama is efficient than Giraph.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Minho Kim <mi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> You heard that Hama-0.7.0 had been released.
> I accordingly have written article about Hama.
> The article explains a graph package of Hama as well as an overview of it,
> with results of the benchmark.
> The following is a link of the article.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q5Of6MbSRe_TM1G_WIODzMb9Owc-_TXg332rbiJjB_4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Let me know any idea after read it. Of cource tell me if there are wrong.
>
> Thanks all.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Minho Kim
>