You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by mailing lists <li...@gmail.com> on 2006/09/08 23:35:36 UTC
[users@httpd] Can someone explain me why Apache 2.2.3 requires libpq.so (postgres) ?
Can someone explain me why Apache 2.2.3 requires libpq.so (postgres) ?
[root@s1 RPMS]# rpm -Uhv httpd-2.2.3-1.i686.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libpq.so.3 is needed by httpd-2.2.3-1.i686
Suggested resolutions:
/home/buildcentos/CENTOS/en/4.0/i386/CentOS/RPMS/postgresql-libs-7.4.13-2.RHEL4.1.i386.rpm
I looked at the spec files I cant find anything about postgres but
like you see here, when I try to install it, it says it needs
libpq.so.3
Seems very weird to me :P
Thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
[users@httpd] Re: Can someone explain me why Apache 2.2.3 requires libpq.so (postgres) ?
Posted by mailing lists <li...@gmail.com>.
Very weird, I found if you have postgresql-libs installed when you
compile apr or apr-utils, httpd will automatically depend on libpg.
I solved this by removing postgresql-libs recompiled apr and
apr-utils. Installed them and recompiled httpd. No error now!
On 9/8/06, mailing lists <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone explain me why Apache 2.2.3 requires libpq.so (postgres) ?
>
> [root@s1 RPMS]# rpm -Uhv httpd-2.2.3-1.i686.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libpq.so.3 is needed by httpd-2.2.3-1.i686
> Suggested resolutions:
> /home/buildcentos/CENTOS/en/4.0/i386/CentOS/RPMS/postgresql-libs-7.4.13-2.RHEL4.1.i386.rpm
>
>
> I looked at the spec files I cant find anything about postgres but
> like you see here, when I try to install it, it says it needs
> libpq.so.3
>
> Seems very weird to me :P
>
> Thank you.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: [users@httpd] Can someone explain me why Apache 2.2.3 requires libpq.so (postgres) ?
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.
On Friday 08 September 2006 22:35, mailing lists wrote:
> Can someone explain me why Apache 2.2.3 requires libpq.so (postgres) ?
It doesn't. PostgreSQL support is optional.
> [root@s1 RPMS]# rpm -Uhv httpd-2.2.3-1.i686.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libpq.so.3 is needed by httpd-2.2.3-1.i686
So that particular package requires it. That's the packager's decision.
When you install a package, you accept whatever decisions the packager
has made on your behalf. I think this packager's decision to include
postgresql support makes sense, given that the apr-util build (which
is the relevant bit) doesn't (yet) support loading the pgsql driver
dynamically.
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.prenhallprofessional.com/title/0132409674
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org