Re: More readable LOG Macros.

[Dinesh Premalal <xy...@gmail.com>]

Kaushalye Kapuruge <ka...@wso2.com> writes:
> +1. But when it comes to submodule prefix, could this be a problem?
> Say I need to use prefix
> [rampart][oxs] for OMXMLSecurity and
> [rampart][util] for Utility module etc.
> Would that be a big issue if we give the freedom of passing the prefix?

Is this a standard that we are using [Module][Submodule] prefix ? For
me [Module] prefix and file name and number is detailed enough :) Is
there any advantage over logging submodule prefix? 

For Axis2/C logs, we didn't use any prefix so far. I think it is better to
continue that for the future as well. 

thanks,
Dinesh
-- 
http://nethu.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org

Re: More readable LOG Macros.

[Kaushalye Kapuruge <ka...@wso2.com>]

Dinesh Premalal wrote:
> Kaushalye Kapuruge <ka...@wso2.com> writes:
>   
>> +1. But when it comes to submodule prefix, could this be a problem?
>> Say I need to use prefix
>> [rampart][oxs] for OMXMLSecurity and
>> [rampart][util] for Utility module etc.
>> Would that be a big issue if we give the freedom of passing the prefix?
>>     
>
> Is this a standard that we are using [Module][Submodule] prefix ?
No there is no such standard but we used to do it in Rampart.
>  For
> me [Module] prefix and file name and number is detailed enough :) Is
> there any advantage over logging submodule prefix? 
> For Axis2/C logs, we didn't use any prefix so far. I think it is better to
> continue that for the future as well. 
>   
Fine with me. :-) File name + line number would do.
Cheers,
Kaushalye
> thanks,
> Dinesh
>   


-- 
http://blog.kaushalye.org/
http://wso2.org/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-c-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-c-dev-help@ws.apache.org